Twob Or Not 2b Analysis

In the article “2b or not 2b”, David Crystal begins with discussing how others such as John Humphry argued that texters are “vandals who are doing to our language what Genghis Khan did to his neighbors 800 years ago. They are destroying it” (335). This is also the common belief of most people. People often argue about the bad points of technology over our language. However, Crystal believes that texting can improve children’s ability to read and write rather than hinder their literacy as many people claim. He also argues that not all texting are done in abbreviated words. Complex messages and institutional messages are often texted in standard form of

In Michaela Cullington’s essay titled, “Does Texting Affect Writing?” the author tests the ongoing question of how today’s youth handles the effects of texting in the education system. Using successful evidence from both sides of the argument as well as participating in her own experiment, Cullington is able to fully demonstrate how texting does not interfere with today’s students and their abilities to write formally in the classroom.

Texting has fast become the preferred form of communication for young adults; however, students need to be dissuaded from texting during class because of the result in loss of valuable class time, lack of effective communication skills, and consistent use of improper English leading to a negative impact on students’ learning.

In the article “2b or Not 2b” by David Crystal, he explains why he thinks texting will not destroy language. He infers that texting adds a new facet to communication. Crystal starts by establishing an opposing argument in the introduction when he mentions John Humphrys’ “I h8 txt msgs: How texting is wrecking our language” (335). One can deduce from the title of the article—and Humphrys’ description of texters as “vandals who are doing to our language what Genghis Khan did to his neighbors 800 years ago.” (335)—that Humphrys does not support texting. Crystal goes on to mention John Sutherland, another man who describes texting as “bleak, bald, sad shorthand. Drab shrinktalk … Linguistically it’s all pig’s ear … it masks dyslexia, poor spelling and mental laziness. Texting is penmanship for illiterates.”

In the article, “OMG! Texting in Class = U Fail :( Empirical Evidence That Text Messaging During Class Disrupts Comprehension”, Amanda C. Gingerich and Tara T. Lineweaver use two experiments to prove that texting during class hinders overall comprehension and confidence over the material. In the article, published by Society for the Teaching of Psychology, Gingerich and Lineweaver imply that their hypothesis is for texting in class to lower comprehension of the lecture material.

After reading Texting and Writing, by Michaela Cullington, I do not agree with many of her viewpoints. Cullington argues that texting does not affect a students writing. Textspeak, the abbreviation and shortening of words like used when writing a text message, does affect the way a student writes because they use the abbreviations, and their writings tend to lack punctuation. When a writer uses excessive abbreviations on a regular basis they can get stuck in the writer’s head causing them to use them in all of their writings. Cullington did make good points of her own opinion on texting and writing in her piece, but I disagree with her and believe that texting and

One of the most significant ideas that the author mentions is that, a study was made and they found that, “college students who texted while doing homework had lower grades, and students who texted during class took less detailed notes and had poorer recall.” I think this is significant because, it is so true. How is a student going to take notes when they are texting while the teacher is talking or when they are doing homework they are texting? Therefore, they will miss a lot of important details that may be on a

She interviews seven students and two teachers from different high schools and colleges with a list of question about the impact of texting on writing. She also put her effort on analyzing student writing samples for instances of textspeak. In addition, her research suggests that there's no response about texting has a bad influence on formal writing from both students and teachers. Thus, students are able to "recognize the difference between texting friends and writing formally and know what is appropriate in each situation" as well as textspeak is not bleeding into academic or professional writing. I agree with her on this point. Still, there are many younger generations in Middle school who starts texting in short and addicted to it. As short-texting is new to those young teenagers, they are pretty excited to communicate by texting with friends without awareness. And if middle school is where students can practice in construct sentences and organize ideas, will texting impacts them on formal writing and will it cause

Katie Hafner’s article, “Texting May Be Taking a Toll,” displays that the rising number of texts sent by adolescents day in and day out is starting to take a big toll on them, their lifestyle, and the people around them. To start off, in the first part of the article Hafner expresses that the point of the first section is that with a growing number of young people utilizing texting and using it nonstop texting is causing serious issues such as anxiety, failing grades, distraction in school, sleep issues and many others. The author exclaims in the section that, “The phenomenon is beginning to worry physicians and psychologists, who say it is leading to anxiety distraction in school, falling grades, repetitive stress injury and sleep deprivation.”

The article “2b or not 2b” by David Crystal is about the era of texting and how it affects teens and children today. It has become common to dismiss that the texting is a bad influence on children who text due to the bad language people write in their text. According to the article, John Sutherland of University College London texting is "bleak, bald, sad shorthand”(crystal 1). This is due to teens who cut the conversation and forget grammar to text to one another. They would put numbers to words or cut letters out to shorten a word. Although, people say that texting is bad and make people stupid people said the same thing about printing. People back then said that it’s evil and put things in people’s mind. This is no different to the opinions

Though the power of text messaging has many benefits to it, the misuse of this technology can cause serious problems for society. With the ability to communicate instantaneously on a mobile device, society focuses more and more on their

Personally I never heard a arguments against texting until Texting: Why All the Fuss! Which state that most students are using texting language when writing papers. Alternatively, I could relate because sometimes I found myself using texting language when writing my papers. As a matter of fact, I don't think it is destroying the english language. Lastly, I know students who use text language inappropriately as critics for the new

The phenomenon of texting has been constantly increasing over the years, a study in 2008 showed that teenagers sent, on average, almost 40 texts a day, a more recent study discovered the average has nearly double within 4 years. With new technology rising and the amount of people using phones to text increasing, many studies have concluded that the effect of texting and the use of “techspeak” teenagers are using could have a negative effect on their literacy and performance during school. An article from the NY times has stated that texting is leading to a rise in teenage anxiety, failing grades, repetitive stress injury and sleep deprivation.

Did you know the human race became illiterate the moment they started communicating by causing bad spellers, poor word structure and critical thinking and comprehension level? Illiteracy is the lack of ability to read and write. In 3200 BC the Egyptian Hieroglyphics was the longest communication towards one another. As time went on writing became shorter than earlier years, causing the hieroglyphics to be less effective. The human race is constantly evolving around new ways to communicate faster and shorter. Although texting is causing illiteracy in society it is conveniently to society. Social Media such as texting is the next evolutionary step to making the human race more illiterate.

Texting is one of the main causes of students being digital distracted in the classroom. “if you use a digital device during class for non-class purposes… texting: 2013: 86%; 2015: 87%.” (Reed) Out of all the things students could do on their devices texting is the main one. Students could be paying attention in class, then they hear the buzz on their phone and the first instinct is to check it because you want to know what it is. When someone texts you, you are not just going to ignore the text. You will text back. It just does not affect you