Txtng Is Killing Language John Mcwhorter

The first chapter introduced the reader to the art of rhetoric. He describes how rhetoric works through real life examples. He demonstrates ways that rhetoric persuades us like, argument from strength, and seduction. He tells the reader that the sole purpose of arguing is to persuade the audience. He showed that the chief purpose of arguing is to also achieve consensus, a shared faith in a choice.

All around our society we witness persuasion. Whether it is a certified dentist selling a toothpaste brand in between our favorite shows on TV, or a church group coming to the door and asking for donations. We see little children begging their parents for a toy, promising they will behave, and the parents give in because they just want peace, quiet, and some time to relax. We have heard of college graduates expressing their qualification for the job, and stating facts about the type of service they are applying for. We look right past it, but in our everyday lives we experience, or even use, the three modes of persuasion. These methods to persuade people were made by a greek philosopher, Aristotle. The first mode is known

Gerard A. Hauser covers a plethora of details on how to create a well-made persuasive argument in his book, an Introduction to Rhetorical Theory; however, he covered three specific essentials that are necessary for persuasion: the components logos, pathos and ethos; purposive discourse and rhetorical competence; identification. I will argue for each constituent, respectively, to prove that persuasion cannot thrive without the aforementioned essentials.

Persuasion can be different for everyone. You can persuade someone into doing something that they didn’t necessarily think they were going to do before by telling them how it will be beneficial to them. Persuasion goes a long way because believing in something and then hearing it from someone else’s perspective can make you think twice about your original decision. If someone else has a better point and can make it clear enough for you to understand, you might easily believe them over your original opinion. Persuasion is a very convincing type of language and is used in so many different situations.

Rhetoric is a course in which students are taught the values of persuasion. And yet, behind this course is the utmost power to corrupt the world, changing it into a world of our own policies. This power, even though seldom discussed, has lead to many intriguing discoveries. One such discovery is how people are able to shape the world they live in simply by choosing the right words. Therefore those who would want the world to be a better place must protect this power. If in the wrong hands this power could cause serious damage. Several authors have striven to protect rhetoric and its power. Few agree on the matter of defining rhetoric, but they know that they must protect rhetoric from dark souls. A single definition of rhetoric must maintain a simplistic nature while incorporating every aspect of rhetoric. However, I argue that rhetoric is a means of persuading audiences of a situation and a particular reality through language and personal appeal. In order to prove this definition I will discuss how rhetoric creates a situation, the shaping of a different reality, the audience, the use of language, and the personal appeal. Finally, I will demonstrate the absolute need for rhetoric.

The video discuss point of view of John McWhorter on texting. Most of people believe that texting is a language decline, constituted by the lack of ability to write. On the other hand, the speaker has tried to expose positives point of texting language, explaining how hard it is to write the way we talk. Besides that, John comments that language exists millions of years before writing, and for writing you need apply many grammatical artifacts such as punctuation, that it is not pronounced during speech. Then, he affirmed that “texting is exactly fingered speech”. In my point of view, texting language comes on to destroyed formal language. Although the language goes through frequent transformations for the adequacy of each period, this type

Among the language and writing, arise the texting. In the video, John affirms that texting it’s not writing, instead of this, texting is the act of write in same way that we talk. In my opinion, the main reflection that we have to do is how the technology affect

To persuade someone can be defined as convincing one to have the same outlook on something as oneself. People go about persuading one in several different ways. Persuasion can be as casual as an everyday conversation to as formal as a speech in front of millions of people. When the author states their purpose of persuasion, this is called their call to action. The call to action is usually the author’s final and last comment on their speech.

Psychology Today suggested “persuasion is an art—If you push too hard, you will risk being aggressive. If you nudge too lightly, you may turn into a pest.” Likewise, Dr. Robert Cialdini and Steve Martin, the authors of Secrets from the Science of Persuasion, have revealed the six universal short guides bolstering humans to the way they are as they request form one another. Many articles and journals were written upon persuasion versus manipulation; however, small pencentage of bloggers and journalist avoided the topic of persuasion as a tool for deceptions. Persuasion is rather a positive method to request the need of ethicically, but the act of convincing have been other used for many inappropriate reasons. In other words, persuation is

The power of a word is humongous. Writing is a weapon in the hands of human beings, and we all need to know how to use this weapon to make the world a better place. Persuasive writing is a form of writing the main purpose of which is to persuade readers that the writer’s opinion is correct. But how can you convince anybody through writing? What are the components of the persuasive writing? How is persuasive writing different from verbal persuasion? These are the questions that individuals need to understand in order to succeed in persuasive writing.

Now ti is time to see what the video says. In the middle of the video it says that it does not effect grammar by texting. They got this by a college because they tested kids and it did not effect the geammar. The College ujniversity was called a common indrusty college in the uk. THey say that they did not find no evidence that textinng can lead to bad grammar. THey also said that it can ruinin grammar but not usually. From the video information, THe video says that texting does not lead to bad rgammar. Now lets get to see what both of the

Texting is not killing our language. If texting is doing anything at all, it is creating another language. Texting is just like when spanish, english, french, etc. were developed. However, many people believe that texting is killing languages. Although, over time, things evolve and get updated for its new potential. For example communication. At first, it started out as just writing letters, then into the telegraph, then phones, then cell phones, and lastly smart phones. However, in 2015 emoji was entered into the English Oxford Dictionary, as a word. The definition they gave emoji is, “A standardized ideogrammatic icon, as of a face or a heart, used especially in electronic messages or on webpages.” In it’s own way, emoji’s are also a new

Persuasion is trying to influence someone’s actions, opinions, or decisions. If you are able to explain what is in it for your audience, explain the what, why and how, while being believable and sincere, you should have

John McWhorter says in his speech, Is Texting Killing the English Language, "civilization, then, is fine-people banging on their smartphones are fluently using a coat separate from the one they use an actual writing and there is no evidence that texting is ruining composition skills. Texting is a new form of communication and can be basically described as a different language. We have had different forms of our language. For example, writing speaking sign language are all different forms of a particular language. Texting is now added on it with those because of its new way we have had different forms of our language. For example, writing speaking sign language are all different forms of a particular language. Texting is now added on with those because it can be described as finger language.texting does not use proper grammar and is bad if texting does not use proper grammar and is bad if you were to use it for writing or speaking, however, this is because it's it's own form of language. John McWhorter "The argument that texting is poor writing is analogous, then, to one that the "Rolling Stones" is bad music because it is in use "violas." Texting is developing its own kind of grammar and conventions." In this quote, he is stating how there are different forms two different things. For example English music, hip-hop and country are two different styles of music and both get different points across. But at the end of the day they are still in English. I believe texting has become a new form of speaking and will revolutionize the

Persuasion is said to be the use of signs (messages) to influence its’ receivers. http://www.cios.org/encyclopedia/persuasion/Aintroduction_1whatis.htm. It means that if the persuader wants to obtain the target, he createcreates messages which discourse is influential. By persuasion one is able to change other peoples’ attitudes, behaviors, beliefs and so on. (Bettinghaus and Cody quoted by Perloff, 2003). Idiosyncratic characteristic of persuasion is that the process seems to have an atmosphere of free will. People meet persuasion in everyday life, one could say in any time. If the company want to sell some product – they use persuasion to convince the audience that they need this particular one. Behind commercial world, people use persuasion to obtain some goals or to improve their relationships with other people. But again it is all about convincing the other side that their choice will be good for them and not to extort, otherwise it is not persuasion anymore.