Tybalt Blame

Tybalt could also be held accountable for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet. Tybalt's nasty, hot-headed persona caused a lot of strife as he always started brawls and quarrelled with the Montagues. When Tybalt gets in a fight with Mercutio, despite the Prince's orders to

In The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet written by William Shakespeare the characters Lord Capulet, Friar Laurence, and Tybalt are the ones to blame for the tragic ending. The first reasons are, Lord Capulet does not support Juliet. Friar Laurence married Romeo and Juliet in secret. Tybalt killed Mercutio; Romeo killed Tybalt so the feud got worse. In Act 3, scene 1, line 88 Mercutio says, “I am hurt.” Romeo tried to break up the fight between Mercutio and Tybalt. Mercutio got stabbed by Tybalt in the chest.

Finally, Tybalt is to blame for the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet. He was the man that killed Mercutio. Mercutio was one of Romeo’s best friends and watching him die to his cousin-in-law made him so angry. If he wouldn’t have killed Mercutio, then Romeo and Juliet would’ve never died. Next, he didn’t accept Romeo’s friendship act. Right before Mercutio was killed, Romeo asked if Tybalt could just be friends. He tried to

In the story of Romeo and Juliet Tybalt is to blame for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet because he always wanted to fight the Montague, he killed Mercutio in a fight, lastly he got Romeo banished from Verona. Therefore you should believe it was tybalt, who is responsible for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet.

Tybalt is responsible for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet because he doesn't like Romeo and is always trying to start a fight with him. Tybalt states “ Romeo, the love i bear thee can afford no better term than this: thou art a villian.... Boy this shall not excuse the injuries that thou hast done to me; therefore turn and draw “ ( 145 ). In act 3 when Tybalt is trying to pick a fight again Romeo responds with patience and love but when Mercutio steps in everything starts heading downhill. Romeo tries to stop the fight which consequently leads to Mercutio's death. Romeo, full of rage kills Tybalt in return and this is what leads to his banishment. As a result of Tybalt's foolishness he is dead and Romeo has to now suffer the banishment. The banishment is the final straw for Romeo so when he hears Juliet is dead he already isn't thinking straight and doesn't have Friar to turn to this

This example only gives the audience a teasing taste for what is about to happen as a result of Tybalt’s short temper. Fast forwarding to act three, Tybalt’s impulsive behavior is far more drastic and impactful to the play this time around. At the town square of Verona, Tybalt and his compatriots run into Mercutio and Romeo. Still infuriated by Romeo’s presence at his family’s ball, Tybalt decides to vent his anger by challenging Romeo to battle him. When Romeo backs away, Mercutio steps in and fights with Tybalt. After a while of fighting, the distressed Romeo steps in to break it up, but, “Tybalt, reaching under Romeo’s arm, stabs Mercutio and flees” (3.1.82). Mercutio announces that, “I am hurt” (3.1.83), and eventually dies. After witnessing his friend be slaughtered, Romeo seeks revenge on Tybalt, and subsequently slays the murderer of his best friend. As a result of Romeo’s actions, the inamorato is banished to Mantua. When putting the pieces together, the audience watching the play can see how Tybalt, and not Romeo, is responsible for the banishment. Romeo was simply seeking to avenge the life of his friend, while Tybalt’s actions were a direct result of violent thinking. Tybalt’s choice to fight and kill one of the play’s main characters highlights the high degree of his vicious personality. Tybalt’s actions end up dooming the peaceful partnership of Romeo and Juliet and thus the outcome of the play takes a turn for the

In The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet, Tybalt was the enforcer of the story and always tried to stir up more chaos in the feud between the Montagues and Capulets. An example of this can be found in Act 1, when the Capulet’s party is going on, when Tybalt senses Romeo, he ends up getting very defensive and angry, “This, by his voice, should be a Montague, / Fetch me my rapier, boy. . . Now, by the stock and honor of my kin, / To strike him dead I hold it not a sin” (5.52-57). Tybalt’s quick and unthoughtful actions make him a hot-headed character who is very easy to dislike. With Tybalt’s previous actions, the story leaned toward the idea that he was going to cause a damaging and lethal event to happen, which he indeed did. After spotting Romeo at the Capulet party, Tybalt felt disrespected and was livid, due to this, he challenged Romeo to a duel. When they both meet up on the street, Romeo attempts to make peace with Tybalt and to end all disagreements between the two. However, Tybalt is there to cause drama and he declines, stating that Romeo’s request “shall not excuse the injuries / that thou hast done to me” (3.1.61-62). Tybalt’s rejection of Romeo’s request led to his own death as well as Mercutio’s. Another consequence of these actions was Romeo’s banishment from Verona, which ended up

Tybalt’s purpose in the play is to cause conflict by dragging on the long time, since dormant feud between the two households. This is shown at the Capulet’s party when he goes to start a quarrel with the Montagues and Lord Capulet’s family stops Tybalt from starting trouble and says this is a time for love not war. Tybalt sees Romeo and straight away thinks of him as a threat and thinks that Romeo is challenging him by just being at the party. He brings Romeo’s presence to the attention of Lord Capulet in order to cause conflict. This is an example of how Tybalt is a character that does not have the ability to just forget about the whole feud and find a way to settle it; he just seeks revenge on any member of the Montague family.

This proves that Tybalt is to blame because he killed Mercutio, that started from joking and then leading to Romeo defending Mercutio's death. If Tybalt would have never killed Mercutio, Romeo wouldn't have killed his new relative, Tybalt.

The first reason explained Tybalt’s short-tempered, ignorant behavior using the Capulet feast, and Mercutio’s death as examples to prove this statement. The second reason explained how Tybalt impacted the story when he killed Mercutio and when Romeo killed Tybalt; using Romeo’s banishment and Juliet’s early arranged marriage it was explained how Tybalt impacts the story after his death. Finally, the third reason discussed how the opposing argument, that Friar is actually at fault compared to Tybalt, is incorrect and that Tybalt is the character, without considering groups of characters or concepts, is most to blame for Romeo and Juliet’s death. It is argued that Romeo would have still killed Tybalt if Friar had not married Romeo and Juliet, examples used to prove this are Romeo explaining how Juliet has softened him and that the major items that cause the tragic ending still ultimately point to Tybalt being at fault. Because of Tybalt’s short-tempered attitude, influence of Mercutio’s death and his own, and still to blame even when compared to Friar Lawrence, proves that Tybalt caused the most impact on the deaths of Romeo and Juliet. The reader should now believe that when comparing and analyzing individual characters, Tybalt becomes most responsible for the tragic deaths of Romeo and

Firstly, Romeo's downfall was caused by Tybalt, and not his tragic flaw. Tybalt caused Romeo's downfall because he stabbed and killed Mercutio, which made Romeo stab him, which got him banished. After Benvolio explained what had happened to the Prince and the two families, the Prince says, “And for that offense/ Immediately we do exile him hence.” (3.1.193-197) This shows that Tybalt caused Romeo's downfall because Tybalt stabbing Mercutio, caused Romeo to avenge Mercutio's life by killing Tybalt, which in turn forced the Prince to exile him as punishment. Like a domino effect, Tybalt's killing caused Romeo's exile, which leads to Friar Lawrence's plan to sneak Juliet out of Verona, which caused Romeo to kill himself to forever lie with Juliet.

Another character that is to be blamed for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet is Tybalt, Juliet’s cousin. Looking at the events leading up their deaths, Tybalt has always been their progressing the problem, rather than attempting to make things better. Tybalt instantly wanted to get revenge on Romeo, after Romeo showed up uninvited to the Capulet’s party, despite Lord Capulet assuring him it was fine. The quote, “This, by his voice, should be a Montague.- Fetch me my rapier boy,... to strike him dead I hold it not a sin” from Act 1, Scene 5 shows that Tybalt was planning to battle Romeo. Tybalt came to fight Romeo, but Romeo, who had just secretly married Juliet, did not want to, as they were now family.

Romeo is the most to blame for the events that occur in Romeo and Juliet because he killed Tybalt, Paris, himself, and eventually Juliet. Tybalt hated Romeo from the start. “As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee”. Tybalt was angry with

But in this tragedy, who or what is to blame for the death of Romeo and Juliet? There are many things that could be to blame for their deaths but a lot of evidence pins the blame on one man. Tybalt Capulet, Juliet’s cousin, is the cause of a lot of grief in this play, and also plays a significant role in the downfall of Romeo and Juliet. The first point that comes to mind of how Tybalt caused this tragedy in the play is when he and Mercutio fight, and

In Shakespeare's “The tragedy of Romeo and Juliet” Tybalt is responsible for Tybalt's death due to the fact that all his actions are leading up to this one draining event. Tybalt was very angry all the time and had a vast temper, Tybalt was ignorant enough to ignore the prince knowing the consequences, Tybalt also came back to fight knowing what he had inflicted.