Types Of Government That Deuteronomistic Historians Should Write About The Israelite Nation
1164 Words5 Pages
This paper is about the types of government that Deuteronomistic Historians would write about the Israelite nation. To understand the theory we need to apprehend what is the Deuteronomistic History’s main belief. The strongest belief was that when Israel is faithful, it prospers, but when unfaithful, it is cursed with defeat, disaster, and exile from their land.
First, the earlier form of government was the confederation of the Israelite tribes. The Israelites believe that they could what they believe was right and worship just Yahweh. “11Then the Israelites did what was evil in the sight of the Elohim and worshiped the Baals; 12and they abandoned the Elohim, the Yahweh of their ancestors, who brought them out of the land of Egypt; they followed other gods, from among the gods of the peoples who were all around them, and bowed down to them; and they provoked the Elohim to anger. (Judges2:11- 12n)” When they acted in such a disobedience way, the following three things followed in a divine punishment, which led to repentance and finally deliverance . The Judge was involved in the process of deliverance.
There was no higher authority of the tribal level, then the judge. They were military leaders with a few exceptions of handling interpretation of covenantal law. The Deuternomistic Historians believed the judges were leaders of Israel; they could have been local or tribal leaders who emerged during times of crises . The Israelite confederation consists of a freely woven