Types Of Non Discriminatory Practices

In this assignment, I will be describing how anti-discriminatory practice is promoted in health and social care settings. I will discuss difficulties that may arise when implementing anti-discriminatory practice in health and social care settings and justify ways of overcoming difficulties that may arise when implementing anti-discriminatory practice in health and social care settings.

The Equality Act (2010) is designed to address unfair discrimination, harassment and victimisation and advance equality of opportunity and ensure good relations between people who share a protected characteristic and those who do not. These characteristics are age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion and belief, sex and sexual orientation.

In this articles the author is argued by listing points to show or to prove women are treated with injustice and that they are not treated equality to men,

The data protection act- the data protection act is legislation put in place to keep personal data confidential. It can promote anti-discriminatory practice as it can stop people finding out information about individuals that the individual wants to stay private. E.g. phone numbers and addresses. These would need to stay private so people don’t find out where you live or what is wrong with you.

This act applies for both men and women. It promotes that both men and women should be treated equally. For example in transport, education, jobs, equal pay etc. It promotes anti-discriminatory practice by making sure that men and women are treated equally, if this act didn’t exist, men and women may be deprived of certain choices. This act includes any discrimination against homosexual marriages or civil partnerships, any discrimination against pregnant women and maternity leave, also equal pay for

M1 Assess the effects on those using the service of three different discriminatory practices in health and social settings Discriminatory practice can be defined as making or showing an unfair or prejudicial distinction between different categories of people or their beliefs and practices, centred around race, age, gender, religion, sexual orientation and disability. Although there are many laws in place to protect individual rights against discrimination such as the Equality Act 2010, there are still cases of it occurring in many different situations including within the health and social care system.

D2: Based on this assignment, I am going to write a report in order to supplement my poster. In order to do this, I am going to discuss certain difficulties that may arise when individuals are trying to implement anti-discriminatory practice in health and social care settings. However, based on the discussion, in order to supplement it, I am going to justify ways of overcoming the difficulties that I would be discussing on my merit.

This is useful within the UK because lays down the law which every individual is entitled too. These rights give us freedom. They may affect many things such as the rights to live and the rights to die also the rights we use in everyday life. National initiatives promote anti-discriminatory practice so issues are prevented from happening.

There are eights that CMWC are working towards, which are protecting and promoting women, social and cultural rights, women’s work, the human right of immigrant women, Aboriginal women, and lesbians, supporting human rights of women around the world and encouraging women’s active citizenship. CMWC looks at 13 demands that is urgent for women and brings it forward to the government. October 17 is national women’s lobby and this allows CMWC to discuss all the demands with cabinet ministers and prime minister. CMWC is working to make sure the gender-based, patriarchal violence that has been embedded in our lives and eliminate it from our lives. Additionally, CMWC is finding different ways to end exploitation, appropriation, and commodification of women’s bodies in media and women’s work. CMWC is putting a stop the negotiation of women humanity and subjectivity and exploitation of women productive and reproductive work, which devalues and objectification women, which is seen as invisible and devalued has been

This paper will discuss and react to the constitutional laws that exist today and have progressed throughout the years regarding gender variants and their human rights in the workplace. The overview of acts and occupational differences will mainly be focused on Australia and the United States through comparing and contrasting their specific regulations and the average work gender variants choose based on the individual’s societal views. In reality, gender variants/people of the LBGTQIA committee are affected significantly by discrimination and segregation in the workplace and in which the efforts to promote greater gender diversity among all three countries will be painted throughout the work.

There are several ways to lower the rate of discrimination. The first step would be to recognize all discrimination laws in your location. The second step would be to develop an antidiscrimination policy. The third step would be to develop antidiscrimination training. The fourth step would be to watch yourself for discrimination. There are many other ways you can prevent yourself from discriminating others.

Despite recent events I remain firm that nonviolence is the key to unlock the shackles of discrimination that hold the black man back. Despite of recent events I remain firm to the idea that integration is the only remedy to heal the deep wounds of slavery that have been left untreated. And despite of recent events I remain firm to the idea that God is on our side and as he changed the heart of paul he can do so with the heart of america.

The Sex Discrimination Act 1984 was enacted for the purpose of giving effect to the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women and prohibiting discrimination on the grounds of sex, marital status or pregnancy in areas including education, accommodation and provision services (Strachan & French, 2007). Furthermore, the legislation promoted recognition and acceptance of the principle of equality of men and women within the community. Additionally, the removal of discriminatory barriers has designed and ‘encouraged’ a change in treatment of women in recruitment, retirement, dismissal and termination. As a result, social behaviour modifies through the setup of rules that ‘employers must not discriminate’ through the enforcement of law (Strachan & French, 2007).

As new claims of discrimination and immigration are on the rise so do the definitions of race, color, and national origin expand, how does one keep up? (Bennett-Alexander & Hartman, 2015). It seems that such terms were vague at some point, and with the years have become more fine tuned and detailed. Some may say that if a person has not experienced discrimination, then a person cannot understand the mentality of an individual who has been discriminated against. Although, one can also argue that every individual person has their own unique experiences in other ways that others may not understand.

equal citizen. This approach requires an expansion of the meaning of equality to include all choices people make in their lives. If we look at it in this way, equality means the right not to have one’s life split between career and family. It also means the right to control one’s own social roles. From an inequality perspective, the test in any case would be “whether the policy or practice in question integrally contributes to the maintenance of an underclass or a deprived position because of gender status.” If the law continues to contribute to the repression of women, the court must then deliberate if the law has a substantial impact on perpetuating the inequality of women. If so, the court must use the strict scrutiny analysis to see if the law is reasonable in having a compelling state interest. Therefore, the inequality test moves away from the current equal protection analysis in that is does not need to have a link between similarly situated classes of people. This difference is important because laws that govern reproductive biology rule ways in which women and men are not similarly situated. Moreover, this test demands a strict security analysis of cases that perpetuate the oppression of women, rather than the intermediate scrutiny analysis, which is, applied to all gender cases. Therefore, things that make men and women different like pregnancy or sexuality would automatically prompt strict scrutiny.