Typology Test Validity

According to the Jung Typology Test, my four letter personality type is ISFJ. I was not surprised with my results at all and found them to be very accurate and represent me as a person. As an introvert, “I often prefer doing things alone or with one or two people (CITE). As a student, being an introvert is a disadvantage for me because I do not work well with large study groups and instead rather lock myself in a room and study alone. With sensing, “I learn best when I see how to use what I’m learning” (CITE) and only complete things using what I know from experience. By only using my experience when completing assignments or school work hinders my experience as a student by limiting my ability to learn new material. Through feeling, I tend

Reliability and validity studies to date indicate significant reliability when used with English-speaking populations or those with a reasonable command of English, and that the MBTI does indicate respondents’ Jungian type preferences in the cultures in which it is being used.  Research issues include the investigation of whole type multicultural as well as individual preferences, and the dynamics of interaction of individuals and their culture (Butcher & Rouse, 1996).

Within the Jung Typology Test (JTT) it states that my type of personality is introverted, sensing, feeling and judging. The results indicated I am an introvert over extrovert, the score showed 56%. There was a marginal or no preference to sensing over intuition at 1% for this result. Moderate preference to feeling over thinking at 25%, and a strong preference to judging over perceiving at 78%. So this is saying that I am an introverted sensing with extroverted feeling.

After taking the “Jung Typology Test”, I was given four letters that would describe my personality type. According to the website, my personality type is ISFP, which translates into Introvert (3%), Sensing (12%), Feeling (31%), and Perceiving (22%). I plan to discuss my Introverted personality trait using the COGNITIVE perspective; I will discuss my sensing personality trait using the PSYCHODYNAMIC perspective; I will talk about my feeling personality trait using the BIOLOGICAL/NEUROSCIENCE perspective, and I will discuss my perceiving using the BIOLOGICAL/NEUROSCIENCE perspective. To have the personality type ISFP, this means that I am what most call an “adventurer.” “ISFPs live in a colorful, sensual world, inspired by connections with people and ideas.

After taking the Jung typology test, I was astonished how the results described my disposition down to the minute details. My personality type is introvert, intuitive, feeling, and judging, INFJ for short. INFJs love people, but tend to only share their feelings with a selective few. Perceived as dreamers and doers, this unique combination of vision along with practicality enables INFJs to accomplish great humanitarian feats. Often they are deeply concerned for the people surrounding them, but when situations begin to get to emotionally tolling, this personality type tend to seclude into themselves pushing everyone away. Additionally, they often take on a disproportionate amount of responsibility. My persona matches the test results exactly.

After taking the Jung Typology Test, I was scored with the personality type of ESFJ. The E stands for Extravert, S stands for Sensing, F stands for feeling, and J stands for judging. I have a “slight preference of Sensing over Introversion (6%),” a “marginal or no preference of Sensing over Intuition (1%),” a “moderate preference of Feeling over Thinking (38%),” and a “moderate preference of Judging over Perceiving (25%).” One of the components to my personality type, ESFJ, is extraverted feeling. Within the results, there is a description that gives an in-depth explanation of the quality.

The Jung Typology Test revealed my personality type to be an INTJ personality. This reaffirms other assessments taken previously. I found the INTJ assessments provided as support material for this assignment to be highly accurate. My personality is a major part of how I relate to people, whether it be my family, friends, or co-workers. My introversion, once thought of as a weakness, has been embraced recently.

So together, over the next several years, the mother daughter team, using much of Jung’s work as a foundation, tinkered and toyed, until they fit Jung’s theories into a practical questionnaire that could be utilized in such a way as to determine a person’s individual psychological “type”. Over the years that questionnaire has been continually updated, modified, and refined. Today, it is largely considered the most trusted personality assessment available.

The Humanmetrics Jung Typology Test resulted in an Introvert Intuitive Feeling Judging (INFJ) profile. Those who exhibit the INFJ profile are described as people with a strong humanitarian view of the world who possess a tendency towards idealism. In addition, the INFJs have few friends, however, those friendships are intimate. At times the INFJ will withdraw as it is necessary for them to recharge as they are susceptible to

I enjoyed this typology test very much. It gave me an even more wide perspective into myself that I did not take into account character wise.

The Humanmetrics Jung Typology Test provided me with unexpected results. The test showed me that I am more of an extravert over introvert, I have a “slight preference of sensing over intuition”, I have “no preference of thinking over feeling”, and I have “slight preference of judging over perceiving.” These results surprised me slightly while also telling me things I already expected.

I took the Jung Typology Test on a bus ride home from chaperoning our senior trip to Washington, D.C. Assuming my entries weren't inadvertently affected by any bumps in the road, I would say that the results seemed to more accurately describe me than those from the Five Factor Personality Model test. Of the sixteen possible personality types, my classification was INTJ: moderate preference for introversion (41%) over extraversion, moderate preference for intuition (31%) over sensing, moderate preference for thinking (50%) over feeling, and a distinct preference for judging (59%) over perceiving.

This assignment assured some parts of my personality that I already knew. But, it also taught me new things about me. The Jung Typology test gave as a result that my type of person is ISTJ; 47% introvert, 1% sensing, 34% thinking and 9% judging. I actually agree with these results because it accurately reflects my type of personality. I am a quiet person that does not often socialize since I feel very comfortable when I’m surrounded by my family and close friends. In addition, my personality tends to be very rational and neutral and most of my decisions are normally ruled by what is logical and not based on emotions. Therefore, a lot of people see me as a cold person. The last component which is judging also resembles a lot on me since I believe that we as humans don’t know what the other people have to go through in their daily lives.

For the “What Is Your Jungian Typology?” assessment, I received the type ISFJ. I received a 62% rating of having a distinct preference of Introversion over extroversion, a 19%

My reaction to the “Jung Typology Test” is that it was fairly accurate. I took the Myers-Briggs test last semester for one of my classes and I got the same results. I thought that the test was very simple. However, I thought that some of the questions on the test were a little tricky to answer because I went both ways on it. Some of them were similar to each other with little variations, so it was hard to answer. Overall, I believe that the findings were true to my personality because I can relate to all the letters very well. They truly describe the type of person I am.