Tyranny In America

After the independence of the united states from the British kingdom, the founding fathers were so afraid to fall into the same trap of the absolute power in one hand (like the king), so they had to make sure that they create not only a system of divided powers but also a mechanism to prevent any branch from having an absolute authority.

Separating the power keeps one person from seizing control and becoming a tyrant. In order to make sure that the different parts of power don’t dominate, the Constitution applies checks and balances to insure all parts of power stay relatively equal. Proportional representation also gives all states a voice, and adds another blanket of security to the rights of the people. In present time, the government still relies on the Constitution to decide on many decisions. In over one hundred years, the United States has not had a tyrant, nor has the rights of the people been diminished. Therefore, it is shown that the United States plan of government may not be the best in all situations, but it absolutely guards against an abusive

In 1787, a meeting to create a stronger central government took place in Philadelphia. The subject of this meeting was to create a stronger central government because the current government had weakened under the Articles of Confederation.The goal of this meeting was to prevent any group or person from gaining too much power.The Constitution will be able to guard against tyranny by implicating tactics like Federalism, Separation of Powers,Checks and Balances, and Big States vs. Small States.

In Document B, James Madison states that if all the powers were to be together as one, no matter what type of government it is, that it would define tyranny. He then goes on to say that if the powers remain distanced from one another, then the country will be able to have liberty. This idea of keeping the government from coming together as one ruler is called the Separation of Powers. There are three different types of government that come together to form the national government. These are known as the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Branches. Because each branch has their own different set of things they can do as part of the government (like the Legislative Branch can pass new laws) they will not be able to come together. This Separation of Powers will stop any type of tyranny from being able to

In this classification of government things are run smoothly and everyone works to the best of their ability. The human race all throughout time at one point or another confronted the matter of how to prevent dictatorships. Numerous forms of tyranny exist such as oligarchies, despotism, and monarchies. Against such threats the U.S. uses the Constitution as its first line of defence. Federalism, Separation of Powers, Checks and Balances, and Balancing the Power between Small and Large States has defended America from clashes over superiority for over 229 years and hopefully will for years to

The United States would lose its name and stand divided if the Constitution did not bring the thirteen colonies into one body. Within this governing body, fears arise from the difficulty of controlling power in a central government, while still trying to keep unity between the states. Understanding that the United States was formed based on the people’s irritation with the corruption of the control of power in England, the Constitution reassured the people that their freedoms were going to be kept, but it required their trust. The founders of the United States Constitution established a just government through encompassing equal representation, with the people as the foundation, and protecting the injustices that could arise with the misuse of power.

With the concept of majority tyranny in mind, the founder’s, including Madison, divided the power of the government into three different branches. The need

The Framers of the US Constitution wanted to prevent the concentration of power into the hands of one individual, or even one group of individuals, within the national government. Thus, they reduced all governmental functions to essentially three:legislative, executive, and judicial. Because they believed that the very root of tyranny was to allow these three essential governmental functions to be exercised by one person or group.1 Consequently, they deliberately set out to devide the three functions into three separate and distinct institutions under the principle of separaton of powers, so as to gform a more perfect Union h.

By adopting the Articles of Confederation, the Americans believed they were keeping a strong national government from taking control over the nation as a king would, by exterminating a national executive branch. To the people, no national power was deemed just, not wanting to be bound to the “chains of tyranny”, as they viewed the loyalists. The national government had practically no power, without being able to receive money through taxes, the federal government had to beg for money from states or borrow from other countries. The men in charge believed a more centralized government would be needed to have a success country. The resolution to a balanced power between the state and federal government was checks and balances. Checks and balances divided the federal government into three different branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. The breaking up of the branches ensures that no branch can overcome one another, resulting in equal power. After the ratification of the constitution it somewhat resembled the British government but also differed immensely by the system of checks and

Living in one of the most distinguished republican societies in the world, Americans have the responsibility of understanding the government, and why and how the various principles within the constitution prohibit the government – or branches in the government – from becoming too powerful. One of the key tenets of republican government is the separation of powers; separating the various powers allow for the branches to act as checks and balances for each other. According to one of America’s founding fathers, James Madison, a government without separation of powers is the epitome of tyranny. Madison argues in his essay, “Federalist 47,” that although the separation of powers among the three branches of government are essential to liberty and

“Liberty requires the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct”(Source: Federalist Paper #47, 1788). Due to the significant events that occurred during the American Revolution, the new U.S. was in a need for a government. Although the Anti-Federalists worried that the constitution would not protect the people, nevertheless the constitution guarded against tyranny due to federalism, checks and balances, and The Bill of Rights.

Fears of a strong federal government encompass many Americans’ minds because of concern that a monarchy will, once again, control them like it once did under British rule. The Constitution, although a

America's republican form of representative government was premised upon the idea of three co-equal branches of government: Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. The three branches, in theory, operate independent of one another and serve as check upon one another. It is this structure of this government, the founders believed, that would retard any establishment of monarchial government that the American Revolution was fought upon. However the civil war, and more specifically the Reconstruction period following it tested these principles to the core. While it may be accurate to characterize governmental struggles that defined Reconstruction as ones that were inter-branch, a more detailed and nuanced survey reveals it was borne more so out

The Constitution placed a great deal of power back into the hands of a strong, central government much like that of a monarchy. “The extraordinarily powerful national government that emerged from Philadelphia possessed far more than the additional congressional powers that were required to solve the United States’ difficulties” (Wood 151). The U.S. government was extremely revolutionary though, in the way that it viewed and handled sovereignty. “Unlike the British in relation to their House of Commons, the American people never surrendered to any political institution…their full and final sovereign power” (Wood 160). Throughout the entire American struggle to establish a suitable government, the citizens maintained their ability to influence policy in a way that the British never could.

A common characteristic that contributes to the practices of democracy is the concept of checks and balances. James Madison, the fourth president quoted "the accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands...may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny." These checks and balances are primarily used to assure that the government or no branches or offices of the government hold to much power. The term “separation of powers” is somewhat inaccurate in terms of the powers are not actually be divided but they are ideally shared. The founding fathers of this country believed that unrestrained power is dangerous, and is a good thing the president and court check each other along with the state and federal governments. For example, the Congress is in charge of making the laws and other legislature authority but the president can veto that bill. In return, the president is also limited because the congress can then override the veto by 2/3 of the majority. The