Midterm 1
The U.S. system is a Congressional/Presidential design (not parliamentary), with district-based voting (not party-list and proportional), with elections that are historically candidate-centered (as opposed to party centered), and a resulting Congress where power is often, but not always, concentrated in committees (not party leadership).
The comparison of the U.S. Congressional/Presidential system to parliamentarian system can be traced back to Woodrow Wilsons Congressional Government, where he viewed the British system as perfected party government system.
The United States Congressional/Presidential system has Congress as the central power and is referred to as a singular form of governance with its own particular characteristics, whereas the parliamentarian system is governed by Cabinet Ministry. There is a definitive contrast illustrated between these two systems. One of them being as the “administration by semi-independent executive agents who obey the dictation of a legislature to which they are not responsible” and another one as being the “administration be executive agents who are accredited leaders and accountable servants of a legislature” that are dominant in all things.
The essential difference between Congress and the parliamentarian system is that in parliamentarian system legislatures have constitutional responsibilities for forming the government structure. However, in such system, no government can function that is unable to win a confidence
The US federal legislature is bicameral, therefore it consists of the Senate and the House of Representatives, and in theory they should both be of equal power. However, in reality it is the Senate which is considered to hold the most power, although there are arguments to in favour of them having equal rights. In order to reach a balanced judgement I will consider both sides of the argument, beginning with the claim that the Senate is more powerful than the House of Representatives.
In this essay, I will be writing about how the power relationship between the United States Congress and the presidency has changed during the past two hundred years. I will be talking about how the executive branch is more powerful than the legislative branch and how the changing relationship between Congress and the president affected American democracy in a good way.
Parliamentary – a system of government in which both executive and legislative function reside in an
There are three types of political system in the world. They are the one party, two parties and multi-party. America has a two party system. The two party systems are still in existence because of historical circumstance, stability; the winner takes all principle and preservation of the two-monopoly system and due to the informal institutional supports. A two party system is a system that involves two major political parties and these two parties including a majority and a minority party that dominate within a government.
Both share similar concepts of a group who holds the legislative powers (for example: Councils and Congress).
Earl Kruschke states in his Encyclopedia of Third Parties (Encyclopedia of third parties), the American two-party system has its origins in the British tradition. The British electoral system is also based on the formula that the winner takes all votes. In both countries bipartisan "owe their dominance in part to the electoral system."
In my own eyes and experience, the American Political System, explained by Jones and Olson, matches today because I am living on it everyday, such as, newspaper, TV news, talking about politics with the people around me, learning and discussing politics issues in my classes, and much more. How the American political system works today is the good system for us because the government has different government institutions that balances the power in order to keep the nation running stable, protect the basic rights of the people, minimal possibility of authoritarianism, more open discussions about the issues that arise, more options before deciding which is the best for the community, nation, international relations and so
The United State presidential system is a system of government that features a president as the nation head of state and active chief executive authority. It is associated with the congressional system of government. In a presidential system, the central principle is that the legislative and executive branches of government should be separated.
While democracies can flourish in both presidential and parliamentary systems of government, parliamentary systems have a special advantage to the US system because of their multiparty nature. With the growth of party polarization in the United States, the two-party model is not able to properly support a presidential system. Thus, the United States could learn from multiparty parliamentary systems. While multiparty systems can create issues, especially because a group can wield a great deal of authority without a simple majority, parliamentary systems still lend themselves to stronger leadership. For instance, presidential systems can attract political outsiders with little experience in governance. Parliamentary systems foster leadership that tends, on average, to have more experience and thus stronger leadership.
In a presidential system an independent congress from the executive office allows for a wider range of policy to be addressed and passed than that of a parliamentary system. As Mainwaring and Shugart explain because congress is separate from the executive office they can act on legislation deemed necessary rather than worrying about the stability of the government. Thus the priority of congress is exactly what it should be, to purpose and pass legislation, this allows for more serious issued to be addressed because they are not afraid of offending the executive office. Whereas in a parliament their priority is constantly torn between pushing just the right amount of legislation to make progress, but not too much that it will break the coalitions with the Prime Minister’s cabinet and thus destroying the government. Ironically the priority of legislatures in a parliament is maintaining a stable government or obtaining the majority, not pushing legislature.
“Parliamentary: systems in which governments must enjoy the support of a legislative majority in order to exist are classified as parliamentary” (). From my own personal view I didn’t realise that there were so many differences between the Presidential system and the Parliamentarism system. If we take a look at our own country we see that it is a Presidential system that we abide to, which unfortunately has very little advantages to go with it compare to the United States where the only form of government that would seem to work there is Presidentialism. They have a trust worthy system there compare to what I believe in Ireland is largely dominated by our corrupt government. The president
Lastly, one of the main advantages to parliamentary system is that it’s faster and easier to pass legislation. This is mainly because the executive branch is dependent upon the direct or indirect support of the legislative branch and often included member of the legislature. This would lead to the executive possessing more votes in order to pass legislation. In a presidential system, the executive is often chosen independently from the legislature. If the executive and legislature in such a system includes members entirely or predominantly from different political parties, then a situation can occur where any of the members can win or have the advantage. However, the executive within a presidential system might not be able to properly implement his or her platform. Evidently, an executive in any system is chiefly voted into office on the basis of his or her party’s platform. It could be said then that the will of the people is more easily instituted within a parliamentary system. It is said that power is more mixed and divided in Parliamentary
The differences are can be shown when comparing the administration on judiciary branch. In United States of America the judiciary branches are administered by congress because:-
This issue determines the effectiveness of Parliamentary System and Presidential System as compares to each other. After World War I the demand of democracy started to spread like fire across the world and of course in European Countries as well. Many Colonial Systems & Monarch adopted Democracy and then arises the necessity of a proper Governmental System. It was in the hands of the state of choose in between Parliamentary, Semi – Presidential and Presidential forms of Government. In this period, the Constitutional Monarchies adapted the Presidential System while Absolute Monarchies preferred Presidential or Semi – Presidential form of Government. However, United Kingdom remained under Constitutional Monarchy, but adapted some
The American governing system is one of the best in the world especially with the system of checks and balances which ensure that no one body acts without the consent of the other. The notion of “Separation of Power” is well spelt out in the American Constitution with well-defined boundaries and or rather limitations and extent of actions of each body. The executive, the legislature and the congress are all very significant and play vital roles to sustain the long lasting governing system. The stability of the United States is based on this three governing bodies. It is easy for a country to fall when it has a one-body system of governance or two in a