U.s. Obama 's Campaign

Television has been influential in United States presidential elections since the 1960’s. But just what is this influence, and how has it affected who is elected? Has it made elections fairer and more accessible, or has it moved candidates from pursuing issues to pursuing image? The media only impacts the American Society, especially for the presidential election as it increases the talks in politics and gives the president a higher role to follow. The television race captures more popularity than what a citizen is actually voting for.

November 4, 2008 marked a monumental moment in United States history. American presidential elections were revolutionized because of the 2008 presidential election between democratic candidate Barack Obama and republican candidate John McCain. After eight years, President George W. Bush., Americans were waiting for, what would be the key word of this election - change. The U.S. had the opportunity to witness history with either the first African-American president or first female vice president. It was a full year of pricey campaigning, nationally broadcasted debates, and party strategies, media controversies involving candidates and their families. It also was a year where America realized how the Internet can affect an election. In June

Effective election campaigns have always relied on the candidates’ ability to raise money. Even in the days before television, radio and the internet, it still took money to get the word out to the people in a far-flung land. However, today’s candidates are faced with raising larger and larger amounts of money with each new election that comes along.

The media has always played an important role in the President’s relationship with the public, but just what kind of affect does it really have on the executive office? The first televised presidential debate in 1960 between John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon marked the beginning of a new era – the inaugural shift of the media’s role in politics. Since that time, the media has continued to transform the way the president is perceived by the public through print, broadcast, and more recently, social media. All of said outlets have played vital roles in not only a president’s campaign, but also in their presidency and likability throughout their time in office. While the White House is still the source of most presidential news, the media are the shapers of the story and can frame it pretty much any way they want. There used to be limits on certain issues or realms of the presidency that were to remain untouched, however, first amendment freedoms take precedence over almost any restriction the government could try to place on the media. The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between the media and the president throughout recent years, looking briefly into the past to establish the scale of the dramatic change, and to study their reciprocal connection of how each utilizes the other.

Presidential candidates have power over how they’re shown in TV, whereas before TV they didn’t have much choice but to show up and campaign to just be the best leader they can persuade others that they’ll be. Source A explains the immediate contact the media can give, it can penetrate people’s mind and get viewers like never before, but just because that’s available doesn’t mean it’s the best option on how to portray our presidential elections. If anything, maybe television made the viewers feel closer a few decades ago, but now it’s nearly a barrier we can’t get past, so instead the television‘s impact on showing presidential elections has given the elections a negative impact. No one wants to watch short answered arguments where quality of imagine does better than the impact of your real words and actions. All the TV has done is go for someone’s image, quick answers, and the unfocused aspect of what truly matters, if your president is who will make your world a better place or

In modern campaign races, candidates must find new and unique ways to connect with United States citizens. In the United States, the campaign of 2016 started off and continues to show a shift in issues citizens currently find important. The campaign has been unique for who ran and continue to run for the title of nominee. There are some veterans such as Hillary Rodham Clinton and some new to the race such as Ben Carson. The Republican Nomination for 2016 more than the Democrat’s has brought a large spectrum of different candidates with distinctive rhetoric and stances on issues to the public eye. An individual that stood out greatly against the grain was Donald John Trump. Trump’s work with The Apprentice did help to get his face known in the public, but may not the reason he attained a large support on the campaign trail. Other factors such as personality traits and social media contribute additionally to how well Trump campaigned. Trump contain some traits such as an appeal to voters through his rhetoric, an association with the Republican party, and utilization of social media. Trump’s effective usage of these two methods allowed him to become the Republican Nominee.

Barrack Obama’s tenure as President of the United States is coming to a close and voters should understand how to gather reliable information on new candidates, such as Jeb Bush. Even though paying attention to all four major types of media platforms; digital, legacy, a candidates’ own media, and social media, creates a sound informative opinion on Republican Presidential hopeful Jeb Bush, digital media provides voters with the most holistic view. The benefits of digital media, throughout the week of September 15th through the 22nd, created an opportunity to construct a different point of view on Bush and what he stands for.

Historical Background of the policy: The Obama campaign of 2010 was a driving force to establish a better quality of health insurance for all Americans who were uninsured. Before the act was passed nearly 102 million Americans were in health insurance policies with lifetime limits; it was estimated that as many as 20,000 people annually could be denied coverage for care due to those limits (The Affordable Care Act: the impact of health insurance reform on health care consumers: hearing of the committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pension, United States Senate, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, first section..January 27, 2011., 2013). Most beneficiaries who have reached their lifetime limits are seriously ill, which results to them having to use their benefits but instead of receiving it they have already ran out just when they needed the coverage the most. Another problem that corrupted the health care field was young adults going without health insurance from their jobs because of the fact employers were not offer plans, it being too costly, or individuals not being ineligible for their parent’s coverage due to their age. Cancellation among policy or were required to pay a higher expense for coverages that provided service for pregnant and nonpregnant women. Employers suffered dealing with offering employees’ high insurance coverage or not offering it at all. Also, individuals who suffered from preexisting conditions rather it was an elderly or a child they were either

When the 2016 presidential campaign began, no one expected that the big collection of current and former governors would slide to the back of the pack. Governors once had an inside track to the White House. Is that a thing of the past? It’s hard to say for sure yet -- but the current governor-candidates have all had trouble. The ones with the most experience in governing have had the hardest time exciting citizens, while those with the least experience have created the most buzz.

Levy (2016) states that “Struggling to make ends meet, Ben Carson’s 2016 Republican presidential campaign woes continued Thursday with the announcement of a “reorganization” that cost dozens of paid staffers their jobs.” This statement shows the impact that finances have on the US presidential campaigns. It follows that the fate of the presidential candidates’ fate relies on organization and by extension, their pockets.

As Democrats consider Hillary Clinton’s candidacy for the second time, women are wrestling with a difficult question: whether they have an obligation to get behind someone who is closer than anyone has ever been to becoming the first female president.

While other forms of media have gained more influence in recent years, television continues to be a key source of political information for the American public. According to a 2008 Pew Research survey, about 72 percent of Americans claim television as their "primary source for news about political campaigns" (Polsby 79). In response to this large pool of potential voters, prominent campaigns like those of presidential candidates often use television as their main vehicle for publicizing their political views and shaping their political image. As a result, generally, presidential candidates with more television exposure tend to be elected more often.

In 2008, Barack Obama entered the presidential race with campaign slogans such as “change we can believe in” and “yes we can,” which resonated strongly within the hearts of the general population. Facing deep economic recession, increasing unemployment, and our country’s liberties writhing away, the vast majority of American citizens were yearning for a leader to head us in a better direction. The amount of optimism the American people embraced with Obama’s presidential victory was immense. The promises throughout his campaign lifted the hopes of every citizen throughout the country. Change! It’s what everyone was needing. He symbolized as sign of hope with promises of creating equality, prioritizing diplomacy over war, challenging corporate greed, generating jobs for rising unemployed, and reforming healthcare to provide coverage for all citizens.

I believe that the US Presidential election should deserve all the media attention it is receiving because the USA is one of the strongest world economies and will have a massive influence on other country’s economies. The US politics are known to be very complex. Even though we’re inundated with the media coverage of this election, it can still be difficult to figure out what exactly is happening. In 2014 it was stated that more and more americans are using cell phones to follow political news with 28 percent of registered voters. In other words, people are following election news and development in which this can help them understand more of the US politics from looking at social media sites and blogs. As every economic situation in the world

The presidential election is in full swing. We are deep in the action with fireworks constantly going off. It is less than two months for the electorate to choose their new leader. This is the climax of the elections; we are approaching the highlight of politics. This is a very distinct presidential election for the country due to the individuals representing the two major parties. Hilary Clinton vs Donald Trump. What used to be friends now turns into a rivalry for the highest office in America. The importance of this run may affect the future severally in a positive or negative way and the electorate is here to choose what they deem most appropriate for the country. The media is the medium for these candidate’s messages to get across to their