U.s. Subprime Mortgage Crisis

The mortgage crisis of 2007 marked catastrophe for millions of homeowners who suffered from foreclosure and short sales. Most of the problems involving the foreclosing of families’ homes could boil down to risky borrowing and lending. Lenders were pushed to ensure families would be eligible for a loan, when in previous years the same families would have been deemed too high-risk to obtain any kind of loan. With the increase in high-risk families obtaining loans, there was a huge increase in home buyers and subsequently a rapid increase in home prices. As a result, prices peaked and then began falling just as fast as they rose. Soon after families began to default on their mortgages forcing them either into foreclosure or short sales. Who was to blame for the risky lending and borrowing that caused the mortgage meltdown? Many might blame the company Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but in reality the entire system of buying and selling and free market failed home owners and the housing economy.

The financial collapse of 2008 devastated many families and caused many people to lose their jobs and homes. It became the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s. The financial collapse began in 2007 when sky-high home prices in the United States finally turned decisively downward, spread quickly, first to the entire U.S. financial sector and then to financial markets overseas (Encyclopedia Britannica 1). The Securitization Food Chain is what sent the mortgage business into a downward spiral causing thousands to foreclose on their home and many even needing to file bankruptcy. When giving out high mortgage loans to middle or lower class families they are being set up to have future financial issues when their payment rate increases. The Securitization Food Chain had a major influence on the Financial Crisis.

The recent mortgage crisis in the US was unprecedented. It led to a massive clampdown of financial institutions, occasioning one of the worst financial melt-downs the US has ever faced (Jaffe, 2008). Quite naturally, it would be necessary to examine the cause of the crisis in order to draft prophylactic measures that would prevent the same financial disaster in the future. This paper will discuss the events that led to the mortgage crisis.

In the lead up to the current recession, when the real estate market began to fall, there were so many investors shorting stocks and securitized mortgage packages that were already falling, that the market simply fell further. There were no buyers at the bottom, and the professional investors made millions off of the losses of others. Beyond this, there was no real federal regulation for securitized mortgages, since there was no real way to gauge the mathematical risk of any given package. This allowed the investors to take advantage of the system and to short loans on real people’s homes. Once these securities were worthless, many of the homebuyer’s defaulted on their mortgages and were left penniless. No matter from which angle this crisis is looked at, the blame rests squarely with the managers who began the entire cycle, the ones who pursued the securitization of mortgages. Their incompetence not only led to the losses of Americans who have never invested in the stock market, but to losses for their shareholders.

The financial crisis emerged because of an excessive deregulation of business operation of financial institutions and of abusing the securitization mechanism in the absence of clearly defined rules to regulate this area in the American mortgage market (Krstić, Jemović, & Radojičić, 2013). Deregulation gives larger banks the opportunity to loosen underwriting lender guidelines and generate increase opportunity for homeownership (Kroszner & Strahan, 2013). After deregulation, banks utilized many versions of mortgage loans. Mortgage loans such as subprime and Alternative-A paper loans became available for borrowers challenged to find mortgage lenders before deregulation (Elbarouki, 2016; Palmer, 2015). The housing market has been severely affected by fluctuating interest rates and the requirement of large down payment (Follain, & Giertz, 2013). The subprime lending crisis has taken a toll on the nation’s economy since 2007. Individuals who lacked sufficient credit ratings or down payments resorted to subprime mortgages to finance their homes Defaults on subprime and other mortgages precipitated the foreclosure crisis, which contributed to the recent recession and national financial crisis (Odetunde, 2015). Subprime mortgages were appropriate for borrowers with substandard credit and Alternate-A paper loans were

The beginning of the crisis: From the early to the mid-2000’s, high-risk mortgages became available from lenders who funded mortgages by repackaging them into pools that were sold to investors. New financial products were used to apportion these risks, with private-label mortgage-backed securities providing most of the funding of subprime mortgages. The less

The most commonly known sub-prime finance crisis came into illumination when a sudden rise in home foreclosures in 2006 twirled seemingly out of control in 2007, triggering a nationwide economic crisis that went worldwide within the year. The greatest responsibility is pointed at the lenders who created such problems. It was the lenders who, at the end of the day, lend finances to citizens with poor credit and a high risk of failure to pay. When the Feds inundated the markets with growing capital

June 13, 2007 is the day that Richard C. Cook claims in his article, “It’s Official: The Crash of the U.S. Economy Has Begun.” In the past couple of years, months, and weeks, the United States economy and stock market showed significant failures and inefficiencies to the world. Perhaps the greatest evidence signaling the recent economic meltdown is the subprime mortgage problems that started a little over a year ago. The burst of the U.S. housing market bubble was caused by a combination of risky lending and borrowing practices and higher interest rates coupled with dropping housing prices, making refinancing more difficult. To deepen the drama, Wall Street’s excessive debt and unsustainable

Low interest rates and the ease of borrowing money are two primary causes of the current recession. In 2007, 37% of the total home mortgage loans were considered a “liar loan” because the mortgage lender did not evaluate income or assests (Russo, Mitschow, & Schinski, 2015). The Federal Government sought to encourage home loaners to loan to risky homebuyers and they kept low interest rates for far too long. During this time mortgage brokers began selling home mortgage loans rather than a commercial banking system. They were not subject to the scrutinized federal regulations, and lent money to many individuals who were unable to afford the homes that they were buying. Many people overestimate their ability to pay debt, resulting in them buying expensive homes because they were approved regardless of their credit or income. The crisis occurred when homes values dropped due to the ability for individuals to buy expensive homes, which resulted in people owing more on their homes than the value of the house. It was nearly impossible for people to make a profit when selling their homes, so many homeowner’s felt that it would be best to default on their loans as they were losing money paying for a home with less value than the actual loan. The more foreclosures there was, the more home values diminished and causing more and more

Financial institutions did little stop subprime lending, the popularity of these types of loans kept growing, and lending companies took quantity of loans over quality which added to the so called “housing bubble” (Burry, 2010). Financial institutions didn’t

In 2008, one of the biggest financial recessions of our time occurred. The blame that should be placed on the unexpected crash of the housing market should come from the shady business strategies used by banks and investment agencies, which caused millions of everyday people to lose their jobs and homes. The role of subprime mortgages, CDO’s, and illicit ratings caused the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression. The culmination of these things led to the downfall of the economy and start of a recession.

In this reflective case study I will discuss the financial crisis that occurred in the U.S. in 2008 which precipitated one of the largest catastrophe within the housing market causing a collapse amongst the financial institutions. I will also discuss about how the banks were at fault for giving out loans to individuals who were not capable of affording to pay these loans back and all financial institutions that should have had regulations on the loans that were dispensed as well. Though, the collapse with the financial institutions was not only because of faulty loans that were given out but the overvaluation of securities which caused U.S. real estate prices to descend, the overvalue from some of the subprime mortgages, financial

First in regards to mortgage meltdown it is essential to understand the causes of the issue in order to understand the repercussions of it. One of the key causes of the mortgage meltdown were the lenient loan practices by banks. Banks often gave loans that were not sustainable for the recipients to repay and they gave the loans easily to many who applied and lacked the proper qualifications. The consequences of this action resulted

One of the first indications of the late 2000 financial crisis that led to downward spiral known as the “Recession” was the subprime mortgages; known as the “mortgage mess”. A few years earlier the substantial boom of the housing market led to the uprising of mortgage loans. Because interest rates were low, investors took advantage of the low rates to buy homes that they could in return ‘flip’ (reselling) and homeowners bought homes that they typically wouldn’t have been able to afford. High interest rates usually keep people from borrowing money because it limits the amount available to use for an investment. But the creation of the subprime mortgage

Among the important catalysts of the subprime mortgage crisis was demand and supply. The demand side description depicts the trend or fad as a return to the slacked lending principles that occurred before the financial crisis dilemma, concerning repressed demand for borrowers who defaulted throughout the worst years the crisis existed in. The supply side description is mainly the constricting