US Defense Against Terrorists: Drones Essay

Even during testing, drones only hit within the expected region, 50% of the time, and in reality this percentage could be lowered by uncontrollable forces, such as weather (Chris Cole, 2014). Drones may have better accuracy and lower civilian kill rate than some other weapons, but that does not justify why drones are safe and should be used limitlessly. With people falsely persuaded that drones are “risk free”, the military is less likely to send lethal force, resulting in the United States dragging a longer and less aggressive warfare (Chris Cole, 2014)

Drones are a better alternative to traditional methods of war because they kill less civilians, are legal under international law, and also that they do not create more terrorists than they kill. These facts will prove that older methods of war such as mortars, and bombs pale in comparison to the drone and the effect they have and will continue to have in the war on terror.

Drones are not harmless robots, they can be used to drop bombs and even deliver drugs. In May, a man was arrested for trying to fly his drone over the White House fence and another man was arrested last week for flying one into the U.S. open (CNN). Drones could start to be used as suicide bombers, they have the camera all that is needed is a timed explosive. The dangers that drones pose

Drones are an effective counter insurgency tool deployed extensively throughout the world, especially by clandestine intelligence organizations often with the help of the country’s respective Air Force. Not only do they serve as an effective weapon, they minimize human

Granted, the US military benefits from the use of drones to strike or conduct surveillance. For starters, drone strikes are cheaper than engaging in ground or aerial combat. Maintaining a single drone proves much cheaper than maintaining the number of troops required to complete the same task. Many more costs come along with the use of an army, such as the feeding and hydrating of troops, a very cost effective task. Drones, however, require a few technicians and a driver, a cheaper replacement. Another benefit includes the amount of damage drones conflict. Drones possess the ability to do just as much damage as a ground attack. They have, since 2009, killed over 2500 combatants, and dozens of high-class commanders of terrorist organization (Shane par. 13). The use of drones allows the US to eliminate many terrorist organizations, as shown by these numbers. These deaths have allowed America to live safer. Drones help to slowly defeat these terrorist organizations. Lastly, drones save more American lives. Using drones puts no American lives at risk since the placement of the drone driver lies far away from target and far from harm’s way. Compared to aerial or ground attacks, drone strikes save many more American lives since no Americans receive any threat. Though drones prove beneficial in a few

First the cost of drones are very minimal. Second drones are unmanned witch allows for there to be no immediate risk for US personnel. Third because drones have the ability to conduct surveillance missions following targets before striking, they eliminate collateral damage. On the contrary the explanations in the papers and other forms of written literature exempt in explaining why drone strikes have raised so much since the inauguration of president Obama in 2008. It is not that drones are not new technology; it is that we have just seen a rising increase in their use, this is a fact not brought up by modern explanations for why drone use is increasing. Therefor saying, traditional explanations for the increase in drone strikes fail to present a detailed disintegration of the nature of drone strikes targets as they have increased over

Drones are becoming our military’s primary weapon in the fight against terrorism. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, otherwise known as drones, are remotely controlled from a long distance. They are usually equipped with a camera and also be armed. Drones are proven to be cost effective, and kill fewer innocent civilians than other military options.

Drone operators can pilot drones over a certain target thousands of miles away. “Drones have several advantages over manned aircraft. Drones can aloft for several days. They can be equipped with video cameras and listening devices that can closely monitor what is happening on the ground.” (source A) Here, the advantages of using drones rather than manned aircraft are stated. Also using drones will lower the rate of pilots killed from backfire during war, this can also be a huge reason why drones will continue to be used in warfare, until a new tecky way of firing during war is made. Another reason why drones are useful during war is because of their preciseness. “ A drone strike can kill a person in one room of a house and spare the lives of people in other rooms. Their precision means there’s less of a chance of innocent civilians being killed. However, there have been cases of drone attacks killing civilians along with the intended target.” (source A) So yes, the precision of drones can be precise, but would we want to continue taking the chance of the drone also killing innocent

Drone technology was created for a reason, and in society, we are choosing to move forth with its benefits. Firstly, many see drone warfare as positive because it takes soldiers off the battlefield and keeps them safe at home. Drones are being programmed autonomously to act in dangerous situations, thus saving the lives of our soldiers. However, their military jobs are eliminated in the

It's simple really, drones can do what humans do all drones are, are machines that survey and kill “Drones do not capture hard drives, organizational charts, strategic plans, or secret correspondence, and their tactical effectiveness is entirely dependent on the caliber of human intelligence on the ground” (Foreign Affairs). By using drones the US loses the possibility of gaining important and valuable information, “...Washington’s overreliance on drones is that it destroys valuable evidence that could make U.S. counterterrorism smarter and more effective… The United States kills a suspected terrorist, it loses the chance to find out what he was planning, how, and with whom -- or whether he was even a terrorist, to begin with” (Foreign

Some estimates put the civilian to terrorist kill ratio as high as 50:1! Malala Yousafzai, the Pakistani girl who survived an al-Qaida attack for her pro-education activism, says of drone strikes: “It is true that when there’s a drone attack the terrorists are killed…But 500 and 5,000 more people rise against it and more terrorism occurs.”(www.Timenews.com) Drones need to be banned from the United States. Drones also have a big influence on the piolets themselves having them kill hundreds of people from half way around the world. There should be no drone warfare

If we used drones for warfare we would be constantly killing innocent people trying to catch a group of terrorists. Eventually after constantly killing so many families trying to reach to one group the people in that country will become furious at the United States for killing their families and they’ll gain anger and hatred and join the terrorists just so that they can get us back for taking their families. Also, the drones can and will strike anyone who fits a specific terrorist profile or engages the same behavior as them. When the drones strikes anyone that fits a specific terrorist profile that just shows that they could possibly be killing innocent people because in source K it says “ Top-Secret intelligence reports

Our U.S. Military troops have a difficult time capturing the enemies so it is obvious that they decided to use drones. Drones have made their work a lot easier because they are more precise in shots. In source B, the image shows the question, “Ok. Show of hands. Who’s for drones?”. All the soldiers are raising their hands because they know it will make their job easier which is understandable because they take a lot of responsibility in keeping us safe. The accuracy and advanced technology in drones has increased rapidly and promoted advances to military. The ease that drones advertise has improved the military’s ability to stop terrorists from causing harm to the United States which is the main priority but in the process they are killing crimeless people, so is using drones really worth

Drones have made terrorist attacks fast and easy to deal with and will do the same in wars. Every war has pain and suffering and builds a want in people to end it rather they’re winning or losing. Although those feelings are negative without them we would be desensitized,

Drones have recently hit the news time and time again within the last decade, and frequently lead to a debate. The majority of those heated conversations often involve the United States of America. Those passionate discussions have ignited a spark in a series of countless debates dealing with drones and the future they possess with the United States of America. Some may not know, but drones are also known as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles or UAV’s for short. A UAV is exactly what it sounds like. First you have aerial vehicle; which is unmanned, but is piloted by a person who is controlling the vehicle from the ground. Drones may seem like a recent technology but it in fact, that depends on your definition of recent. In formal terms, “recent” is often referred to as of late occurrence, meaning within a few years. A drone however is not a recent technology. The earliest recorded use of drones spans back as far as the American Civil War. These drones were self-propelled balloons with explosives on board ("Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)." 762). The United States has been working with drones ever since the civil war. Drones now days are used for reconnaissance and marking targets. Although, as of late they have become a surgical strike weapon via the hellfire missile; and is one of the most sought after defensive weapons a nation can have. Drones are very effective in keeping America safe because of their minimal risk, continuous usage and low cost, and response to a rapid crisis.