Ubertrust Case Summary

Currently there’s news which is creating a question in the public’s mind that is this the correct thing done by Uber, a rideshare app producing company, which passed a strange order that any passenger or driver should not be carrying any firearm into the vehicle while they are on drive and if in case they see any violation there would be serious action and they would not be allowed to access the Uber’s services anymore. Are you wondering is Uber safe for drivers and how to use it safely? If yes then this is the place where you can find the answer for this question:

As the 25th anniversary of the signing of the Americans with Disabilities Act approaches later this month, it is clear that many of the fears of the business community failed to materialize. In the first five years of the act, there was no wave of business failures tied to compliance; no wave of unqualified applicants whom businesses were forced to hire; no wave of workers suddenly claiming disability due to a bad back; and no wave of lawsuits that inundated businesses with the burden of undue legal costs. (ADA.gov, 1995). In fact, tax subsidies provided in the act helped many businesses afford to make necessary access accommodations as well as to provide other reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities, and the positive ramifications have been considerable. Up to 45 percent of the disabled population now hold jobs and are contributing to the economy, (Brault, 2012).

Sylvia Burwell Secretary of Health and Human Services Petitioners vs Hobby Lobby Stores and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corporation vs Secretary of Health and Human Services (U.S 2014)

Uber as a business have conducted and implemented many harmful tactics and policies. The primary issue that Uber has been deemed harmful are Uber taking and requiring all drivers to accept the percentage cuts. In addition, the higher percentage cuts will be deduct from each earned revenue the driver obtain while driver for Uber. This is a very harmful tactics

In this case City of St. Paul v. Uber, 450, N.W. 2d 623 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990) an officer who was with the Minnesota Police department of St. Paul, for eighteen years, had been working the early morning night patrol. While out on patrol he had witnessed a driver, in a pick-up truck at approximately 2:15a.m. in a particular part of town that was known to be where people would pick up prostitutes.

Jerry Hargrave, plaintiff, was convicted of the attempted murder of Shirley Mae Gill (the victim), in a trial by the court under Va. Code. 1950 § 18.2-51. The plaintiff and Ms. Gill, his common-law wife, had been drinking in the earlier part of the day in question. Sometime later, they disputed about the plaintiff moving out of the home they shared to begin a relationship with her sister. At which time victim refused to surrender the plaintiff’s property. Following, the plaintiff left the premises, returning shortly after with a rifle in hand standing 10 feet away from victim, and then shooting a bullet into a washing machine that was three feet way from the victim. The plaintiff was sentenced to a term of 4 years in the State penitentiary.

This will be a violation of the Title VII and discrimination. Lopez Inc., company has only employed Hispanics. Unless the company has a Bona Fide Qualification that can be proved to be in the companies best interest than it is illegal. You have two possible qualified candidates that have applied to two positions and been denied. Lopez Inc. will need to prove that the reason they were denied was that they were not qualified or to prove that there is a valid reason for only hiring Hispanics.

A) If tom finalized the loan agreement before the partnership is formed, he is negotiating the agreement on behalf of him personal. According to Georgia law, an agreement becomes enforceable when there is a meeting of parties’ minds “at the same time, upon the same subject matter, and in the same sense.” Cox Broadcasting v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n, 250 Ga. 391, 297 S.E.2d 733, 737 (1982). The letter of intent before the partnership formation was not applied under I.R.C §721 to be an exchange of property and Tom would have to recognize a gain in exchange of partnership interest. Also, if he negotiated the letter of intent to get a loan for the partnership because of his experience in the real estate business, he is rendering a

To further slim down our market we looked at specific demographics according to gender, income, and approximate age of individuals with disabilities. In 2012, there was a survey conducted on the age and gender of individuals in Canada who had disabilities (Statistics Canada, 2013). Out of those from 15 to 24, 2.2% had a psychological disability, 2.0% had a learning disability and 1.9% had a pain disability (Statistics Canada, 2013, para. 4). Among those aged 45 to 64, 12.7%

Missouri's governor, Eric Greitens, signed a bill “paving a road” for new transportation companies to easily operate statewide and supersede local fees and regulations. This doctrine will result in more jobs and will benefit the economy. Specifically, numerous Missourians will have a steady and good job as a Uber or Lyft driver since this will become an official job. With more jobs, Missouri will overcome unemployment, job loss, and destitution. These positive effects on Missouri will make other states consider passing this law. Uber and Lyft will now setup a statewide regulatory standards for the companies and their part-time, independent-operator drivers. Andy Hung, Missouri's Uber manager, is now creating more app-based services due to their

In the case scenario presented by Professor Wilikins (2018) ask, “A police officer hears a rumor that Dave is selling illegal drugs out of his house. One day while patrolling the neighborhood, the officer sees Dave walking down the street. The officer approaches Dave and tells him he is worried about him and asks permission to search his house. Dave asks the officer if he must allow him to search his house. The officer responds by telling Dave that if he doesn't, he will go attempt to get a search warrant. Based on this, Dave consents to allow the police officer to search his house, and the officer finds over one hundred baggies of drugs.” The first question is, “Did the officer violate any of Dave’s constructional rights? The according to the Legal Information Institute (2017) the Fourth Amendments says, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,

FCC v. AT&T Inc. 562 U.S. 397 (2011) United States Court for Appeal of the Third Circuit.

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — Kanawha County residents met Tuesday to learn more information about payments from a court settlement related to the 2014 Elk River chemical spill.

In proving there was indeed a breach of duty of care, the Defendant must not have provided services that are within the professional standard of that occupation to the Plaintiff. Strictly speaking, Bank of Stars must prove that Young & Brobeck, LLP. did not perform at a professional standard level of a reputable certified public accountant and as for the evidence, the accounting principles that are stated within the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles could be used to verify their wrongful actions. For instance, in the case of Curtis W. Bily, et al Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Peat Young & Company, Defendant, the defendant found a lot of obscure liabilities but the company did not report the disadvantages and made untruthful statements about their client’s financial

The federal Trade Commission was created on September 26, 1914 when President Woodrow Wilson signed the Federal Trade Commission Act into law. The FTC’s goal is to protect consumers, maintain competition, and advance performance. The FTC focuses on the promotion element of marketing or the advertising aspect. The federal law states that any advertisement must be truthful and when it applies be backed by scientific evidence. The FTC enforces this federal law and in a recent case where the FTC charged Fortune Hi- Tech Marketing with making deceptive claims. The Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing Company was misleading people about how much money they could earn by working for the company. The company agreed to settle the lawsuit and provided partial refunds.