Ukraine Crisis Essay

The two countries, Russia and Ukraine, had different reactions towards the armed violence and impeachment of the Ukrainian president. Although the majority of the Ukrainians opposed Viktor’s decision to procrastinate the signing the EU-Ukraine integration agreement, all the ex-presidents accused for its interference with the affairs of Crimean. The former presidents of Ukraine, including Leonid Kravchuk and Leonid Kuchma described the present crisis as Russia’s political interventions designed to interfere with the internal affairs of Ukraine and its relationship with the European Union (Hanschke 1). The people of Crimea have not been seeking for secession from Ukraine, but their interest is to have extended autonomy and rights to govern the Crimean affairs with minimum involvement of the government of Ukraine. Russia, on the other hand, have dismissed the accusation and stated that it is pursuing the interest of the people of Crimea to join the Federation of Russia. Russia holds that the people of Crimea have the power to decide the future of their territory and Russia will be ready to respect their decision. Study shows that about 90

In March, Russia annexed Crimea by a referendum with an unrealistic 97% in favor, claiming that they were protecting ethnic Russians. This Russian move was criticized by the international community since Russia was violating its promise. In foreign policy, countries priorities are in order from security, economy, autonomy, environment, identity and then prestige. Russia knew by annexing Crimea, it would ensure the safety of Crimea’s ethnic Russians. However, Russia needs Crimea for potential long term economic gains and better security in the Black Sea. Russia is also being suspected of supplying weapons to separatist held territories through dubious aid trucks. Again, Russia is supplying so called aid in the name of protecting ethnic Russians, though it is clear he has other economic and security reasons in

    I am aware that on February 27, armed men from Russia seized your government buildings and Russian military men put Russian flags everywhere on barricades while disrupting innocent people’s homes. Crimeans protested these acts and shouted, “Ukraine is not Russia”, even though you are no longer part of Ukraine. Russia is trying to take over Ukraine by gaining

This also connects to the promotion of peace and disarmament. To make peace the mutual respect and collaboration between people is very important, and in this situation the respect of the Crimean’s rights is not present. Peace is the fruit of justice, and in this Crimea, justice has not yet been served and this must be

The controversial Russian military intervention in Ukraine in 2014 depicts lawless arrogant image of Putin. Putin was responsible for invading Ukraine by deploying more than ten thousands armies in eastern Ukraine for more than a year. The civil war broke in Ukraine. The article, “The World May See An Even Darker Side Of Putin” depicted devastated consequences of war:

Throughout the years, it has been observed that conflicts are not being objectively covered by the media worldwide and the 2013 Ukrainian Revolution could not be an exception. For that reason, several articles and essays have been published from various writers during the years, identifying a different scope on the matter each.

The easiest solution, when discussing the Eastern Ukrainian conflict, would be to say the country is split between two sides. This split is normally presented right down the middle with a western and central, pro-European side and an Eastern and Southern, pro-Russian side. However, that is not necessarily the most rational conclusion to make. Ukraine is a country that has had its share of invaders and has often been forced to make choices for the greater good of the ethnic populations. The country’s borders have been rewritten throughout wars, rises and falls of empires, and when claiming independence. Countries have tried to absorb Ukraine and transform the populations, in order, to make them more dependent on the Mother country. Russia

According to an issue of the Wall Street Journal dated 27/March-2014, Russia is still massing troops near the Russian/Ukraine border; the question is “Will Russia/Putin’s uses this buildup as a staging platform for another attack on Ukraine?” These actions by Russia are occurring despite President Putnuns assurances that he has no intentions of violating Ukraine territorial integrity. In addition Putin’s actions runs contra to a an agreement called “The Budapest Memorandum” of 1994, where Russia along with the US pledge to uphold that same integrity- Crimea would seem to make that Russian so much hot air.

NATO and Russian military exercises have erupted in Europe since January when Russia started forcing Ukraine to follow its role in world affairs. The United States, Europe and NATO have stated Russia is protecting rebels many among terrorist organizations who hold all types of Russian weaponry specifically the Russian made Kalashnikov or AK-forty sevens. Ninety five percent of Islamic terrorists in the middle east use the AK forty seven. German and American officials have stated Russia is interfering in Ukraine’s affairs. Russian officials say Ukraine stopping payment to rebels could turn into a mess.

Russia has found itself naked after the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. Russia has always relied on ukraine as a natural gas highway and major agricultural producer. Russia has been living with its own puppet in Kiev. But with Yankovich ousted from office, Russia has no other choice but to take Ukraine back. Ukraine on the other hand has always felt the need to grow on its own, not to mention Ukraine has already been hurt many a time by Russia’s aggressive and heartless actions. The main purpose of this conflict is the

After the fall of the Soviet Union in 1989, international attention shifted from Russia to new powers and threats in East Asia and the Middle East. Al-Qaeda, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and the rise of China dominated the Western World 's agenda, while Eastern Europe was relegated to an occasional mention. Thus, policymakers were thoroughly unprepared when Ukraine was thrust into the spotlight in March. Fortunately, analysts can always draw on the traditional tools of international relations to help explain these events. Although no single critical theory can describe all parts of an event, in combination, these perspectives paint a clear picture of the conflict. In the case of Ukraine, Mearsheimer 's realism provides a strong

To be able to fully understand the purpose and the actions of the Novorossiya terrorist groups, one must first understand what caused the Ukrainian Conflict to erupt and the many developments that happened thereafter.

The year 2014 has been a year filled with violence and complications within the Ukraine, and the entire world has been able to

Throughout the Ukraine, thousands of civilians are living in fear from the dangers that lurk inside their country. Ever since the Ukraine and Russia entered into a tension building war that had everyone on edge in 2014, the Ukrainian citizens have been stripped of many human rights. As of 2015, there have been allegedly more than 10,000 people killed, 20,000 people wounded, and 1.4 internally displaced. Ukraine’s insecure borders, have been altered multiple times by the Russian government. There have been multiple reports of torture throughout the country, for the people are being illegally detained and hurt because of the insecure borders

Russia’s action in Crimea was a response to the threat of NATO’s further expansion along Russia’s western border. Russia seized Crimea to prevent a new government from joining NATO and that Kiev might evict Russia’s Black Sea Fleet from its long-standing base in Sevastopol. Russia wanted to recapture Crimea for the former territories of the Soviet Union. The government never accepted the loss of Crimea so they were determined to restore it in part by expanding Russia’s borders. The government improvised broader designs and presented the response to the unforeseen of Crimea, and this was an impulsive decision on Russia’s part rather than the careful move of a strategist with geopolitical ambitions.