Ukrainian Politics Don 't Do Nothing Help Ukraine Out Of Problems?

Vladimir Putin, who is the president of Russia, the man that is held responsible for tearing Ukraine apart into a battlefield. The eastern region of Ukraine withheld a city (Crimea), which became the headlines of all western and global war for its significant role in the Ukrainian-Russian Conflict. This was due to the city that was being fought over by the two countries. As Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin was bashed by the world for being the new modern Hitler; which Hilary Clinton had compared Putin’s strategical methods on this crisis to. She compared it to the similar Nazi’s of 1930; which she had said in her speech at the University of California. Although, no one can really understand why Vladimir Putin was the most hated man of his time. Later it became evident that it was because of the propaganda that was created by the western media and news. We must really think the fundamentals as to why Putin really entered Crimea, and who really is behind the new regime that has settled in Ukraine as well as which part of the world is standing behind Ukraine.

George Soros, the multi-billionaire hedge fund manager and founder and chairman of the Open Society Foundations, sees a way to solve the crisis in the Ukraine. Soros, who fled his native Hungary with his family in 1947 because of the Soviet aggression and communist takeover of his country, can relate to what is happening to the Ukrainian people in their resistance to the Russian aggression in their country. Soros makes a couple of proposals that he feels will benefit Ukraine in his that was featured in The New York Review of Books titled “Ukraine & Europe: What Should Be Done?” This article can be found at www.nybooks.com/articles/2015/10/08/ukraine-europe-what-should-be-done/.

Ukraine, once a totalitarian state in the USSR, is now being ravaged by civil war. This war has been fought between Ukrainian Nationalist and Pro-Russian supporters in the Donbass region. This rising unrest can be traced back to the Russian ties that run deep in its Government. This Russian influence is being used by President Putin to incite Rebellion in the eyes of Ukrainians, and it all starts with Ukrainian politics of party groups Svoboda and The Party of Regions

The US’s global influence and power place a broad range of intervention tools at its disposal. Even though tensions between Russia and Ukraine are lower than they were a couple of years ago, the impact of the US is visible. First, in the form of economic and political sanctions against Russia (Daiss, 2016). These penalties have proved costly to Russia and in some way have deterred further Russian aggression.

Summary: As of 25JUL17, the U.S. has said it is actively reviewing whether to send defensive weapons to help Ukrainian forces against Russian-backed rebels. Russia warned that anything that heightened tensions could jeopardize a solution to the conflict. This comes following a recent increase in violence over the last week where five Ukrainian soldiers were killed, and another eight were wounded in

First of all, the foreign policy is better in the U.S.A. The Ukraine is in the middle of War in Donbass which has been going on for 2 years now. The war is based on anti-government protests against Russia. The U.S. is not at war at the time so I wouldn’t want to leave a place that is not in war and go to some place that is in war. Another piece of evidence to support the claim is Russia is trying to take over the Ukraine and that is causing various problems for the country. If Russia was to succeed, I would not want to live in a country that is controlled by Vladimir Putin ( Russia’s President) because I believe he isn’t a good leader.

In 2009, Russia again stopped supplying gas to Ukraine, this time because of “unpaid bills and price disputes,” although this was resolved when the two countries signed a ten year gas transit deal. In 2010, Yanukovych, the winner of the first 2004 election, became president. That same year, the parliament also agreed to an extension of Russia’s lease of its Black Sea fleet base in

The two countries, Russia and Ukraine, had different reactions towards the armed violence and impeachment of the Ukrainian president. Although the majority of the Ukrainians opposed Viktor’s decision to procrastinate the signing the EU-Ukraine integration agreement, all the ex-presidents accused for its interference with the affairs of Crimean. The former presidents of Ukraine, including Leonid Kravchuk and Leonid Kuchma described the present crisis as Russia’s political interventions designed to interfere with the internal affairs of Ukraine and its relationship with the European Union (Hanschke 1). The people of Crimea have not been seeking for secession from Ukraine, but their interest is to have extended autonomy and rights to govern the Crimean affairs with minimum involvement of the government of Ukraine. Russia, on the other hand, have dismissed the accusation and stated that it is pursuing the interest of the people of Crimea to join the Federation of Russia. Russia holds that the people of Crimea have the power to decide the future of their territory and Russia will be ready to respect their decision. Study shows that about 90

In March, Russia annexed Crimea by a referendum with an unrealistic 97% in favor, claiming that they were protecting ethnic Russians. This Russian move was criticized by the international community since Russia was violating its promise. In foreign policy, countries priorities are in order from security, economy, autonomy, environment, identity and then prestige. Russia knew by annexing Crimea, it would ensure the safety of Crimea’s ethnic Russians. However, Russia needs Crimea for potential long term economic gains and better security in the Black Sea. Russia is also being suspected of supplying weapons to separatist held territories through dubious aid trucks. Again, Russia is supplying so called aid in the name of protecting ethnic Russians, though it is clear he has other economic and security reasons in

Ukraine’s chief of State is president Petro Oleksiyovych Poroshenko. Its head of government is prime minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk. Ukraine’s constitution was adopted in 1996. The way Ukraine is different from America is that Ukraine has a 5 year election term while the United States only have a 4 year term. From a reliable resource online, All resources are cited in the bottom of the essay, it’s told that the president is elected by a majority vote through a two-round system. It also stated that the prime minister is appointed by the president with the approval of the parliament. Anyone in the supreme council is

The controversial Russian military intervention in Ukraine in 2014 depicts lawless arrogant image of Putin. Putin was responsible for invading Ukraine by deploying more than ten thousands armies in eastern Ukraine for more than a year. The civil war broke in Ukraine. The article, “The World May See An Even Darker Side Of Putin” depicted devastated consequences of war:

The conflict between the Ukraine and Russia is the Ukraine's most long-standing and deadly crisis; since its post-Soviet independence began as a protest against the government dropping plans to forge closer trade ties with the European Union. The conflict between Russia and the Ukraine stems from more than twenty years of weak governance, the government’s inability to promote a coherent executive branch policy, an economy dominated by oligarchs and rife with corruption, heavy reliance on Russia, and distinct differences between Ukraine's population from both Eastern and Western regions in terms of linguistics, religion and ethnicity (Lucas 2009).

Due to Russia and Ukraine sharing a border and historical ties of unity, their economies have also become conjoined, creating a reliance on each other. According to Hromadske International, “Russia and Ukraine’s territorial proximity and integrated Soviet-era economy means that both countries’ economies are largely intertwined” (Dunnet Web). In regards, Ukraine, along with other countries in the EU, relies heavily on gas from Russia. Recently, Russia wanted Ukraine to pay off its gas debts—about 5.3 billion—and cut off Ukraine’s supply until a debt was paid. Ukraine had been struggling to afford the gas prices as a steep rise occurred after Yanukovych signed a reduced deal on gas with Russia. When Russia cut off Ukraine’s supply, EU nations were greatly affected as well. The Russian gas lines run through Ukraine into EU nations, meaning the cutoff of Ukraine’s supply meant no gas for EU nations as well. This caused support and assistance for Ukraine from the EU. Although tensions have been high between

Washington has guaranteed at least $1 billion to help this struggling economy. NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) and the Ukraine have had a meaningful partnership since the early 1990’s.

For about 2 decades now Ukraine has been an independent state. This is the longest period of Ukrainian independence in centuries. Generally speaking it is a resource rich country with many sources of minerals and agricultural products but even more importantly its a strategically located country and to understand the geopolitical value of Ukraine we have to take a look at the history. In fact one can learn to understand geopolitics just by reading Ukrainiean history. This was a country which at time was part of the Ottoman, Polish and Austrain Empires so Ukraine has been on the borders of empires in fact the name itself is derived from a word meaning borderlands. And as most frontier regions it carries a value especialy for the Russian federation. Now economically speaking most of Russia 's pipelines run through Ukraine and given the fact that Russias economy is largely driven by it 's natural gas exports it is vital for moscow to control those routes so it can better influence the price rates. Furthermore the Ukranian oligarchy has closed business links to the Russian oligarchy. European regulations would not only undermine the positions of not only Ukraines elite but also russias elite. Ideologically speaking Ukraine sits at the very core of the Russian identity it was the medieval state of Kevanrus which united the lands of modern Russia Belonruse and Ukraine. For Russians losing Ukraine would be ideologically equal to the german loss of Eastern Prussia but more important