Uncertainty Reduction Theory Essay

Firstly, Uncertainty reduction theory was written by Charles Berger, his theory focus on the way human predict and interact to others. His theory focused on two types of uncertainty and eight Atoms for uncertainty. According to Charles Uncertainty reduction theory is an increased knowledge of what kind of person another is, which provides an improved forecast of how a future interaction will turn out. In another word mean that communication is the key to form health relationship. As human we communicate to generally understand one another and to also reduction our uncertainty. I can apply uncertainty reduction theory to my love life, my first day at a new school, making new friends and meeting new people, new location, and I can also apply uncertainty reduction theory to my first job interview, and many other situation to my life.

The Uncertainty Reduction Theory states that before and during initial interactions between two people, one's first instinct is to reduce uncertainty about the other through various methods. For example, when you see someone you think you would like to know, you try and figure out what they are like through various methods so you can control the conversation and steer it into a path that the other person finds interesting.

Does having too much certainty make you strive for the impossible? Is the effect of doubting yourself more harmful than helpful? Certainty motivates people, yet doubt makes sure you know your limits. When striving for success, your certainty needs to be a stronger feeling than doubt.

Firstly, Uncertainty reduction theory was written by Charles Berger, his theory focus on the way human predict and interact to others. His theory focused on two types of uncertainty and eight Atoms for uncertainty. According to Charles Uncertainty reduction theory is an increased knowledge of what kind of person another is, which provides an improved forecast of how a future interaction will turn out. In another word mean that communication is the key to form health relationship. As human we communicate to generally understanding one another and also reduction our uncertainty. I can apply uncertainty reduction theory to every aspect of my life; I can also apply uncertainty reduction theory to my love life, my first day at a new school, making new friends and meeting new people, new location, and I can also

Problems with reliability must be resolved in order to have confidence in findings Validity * The degree to which your experimental results can be applied to external population 2 Terms that connect directly to things in lecture: * Looking Glass Self * Take others’ perceptions of you to formulate your own self concept Generalized Other (p 78) *

“Uncertainty reduction is a primary motivating factors for communication” (Berger & Calabrese, 1975). Berger (1975) argues that there are three conditions that increase the need to reduce uncertainty about the new acquaintance: (1) Anticipation of future interaction, (2) incentive value, and (3) Deviance. Berger introduced series of axiom that help explain the relationship of uncertainty and eight key variables of relationship development: verbal communication, nonverbal warmth, information seeking, self-disclosure, reciprocity, similarity, liking, and shared networks (Griffin, 2012). This report will be using the Hitch (2005) movie to explain how the theory relates to the movie.

In the article, “In Praise of Vagueness,” researchers investigated the effect of vague information versus precise information on performance in the domains of mental acuity, physical performance, and weight loss. Though past research has found that people prefer precise information to vague when making decisions because it gives them a sense of security, it has also found that vague information causes people to have higher expectations about outcomes: when people have less precise information about what they’re doing, they assume the best case scenario rather than the worst. Researchers expected that this tendency to assume the best would allow people not only to interpret reality more positively, but to actually perform

The Uncertainty Reduction Theory states that relationship development is a process of reducing uncertainty about one another. When developing relationships, people desire to reduce the uncertainty about the other person by attaining information about them (Bradac, 1982). Reducing the amounts of uncertainty is an important component in a relationship. There are three main reasons why people feel uncertain: anticipation of future interaction, incentive value, and deviance.

Certainity and doubt both play a role in one’s life decision making. Certainty focuses on absolution, allowing one to focus on their path and accomplish what they desire. Doubt, however, focuses changing one’s mindset, allowing anyone or themselves to change their mindset and stray away from their goal. Certainty can lead one to success while doubt can stray one away from their goal because certainty allows one to focus on their goal while doubt allows other people, or themselves, to stray one away from their goal.

Chuck Berger’s interview with Denise Solomon falls in line with the uncertainty reduction theory on its validity by means of alluding that uncertainty in the encounter phase has a high likelihood worth about 70%. The motivation for an individual to develop actual communication

However, the statistical definition of “confidence” is much different than the conversational definition. In statistics, confidence does not judge how “correct” a

Developing an absolute sense of certainty can be good, but it can also be bad. There have been some instances where people who had absolute certainty met their downfall. Having some doubt is good. If you have doubt on a an assignment, you can go back and revise it. In a way it’s like a stop sign. Doubt allows you to stop and analyze before going. Although being absolutely certain is good, it can make you over look mistakes, get your hopes up, and speculation occurs.

Communication with others includes giving or accepting a message by means of a medium and envisioning the reaction of the other. At the point when two individuals know each other, every individual is more sure of the answer. Otherwise, a condition of anxious reckoning is run of the

Throughout everyday of a person’s life they receive messages in variety of different ways. They can hear it from another person, see it on the television, or even read them in a newspaper. Every time a message is received a person has to use their own judgment to decide what they are going to do with it. To try and figure out what people do with messages and how they use their judgment researchers in the field of communication have designed studies to try and come up with evidence that support their hypothesis. All of the components previously mentioned make up what is called the Social Judgment Theory and researchers have been designing experiment with different variables for years to try and get a better understand of what this theory is

This presented experiment is based on Illusion of explanatory Depth, which states that peoples understanding about the functioning of everyday objects is often shallow and unclear but still they tend to overestimate their knowledge about its functioning and other given technicalities. Lawson’s 2006, originated this study, and these findings were further replicated to study this phenomenon. In this experiment subjects were asked to rate themselves upon their understanding of working of a bicycle, where mechanisms were explored through pre-task confidence, post-task confidence and overconfidence. Since people tend to give socially desirable responses while answering such kind of questions a BIDR scale was implemented in order to study the level of social desirability of the participant. It is expected that subjects tend to overestimate their ratings prior to the task, however after they come across the technicalities of the working of the bicycle during the experiment; they tend to reduce their ratings when asked about the technical aspects towards the end of the experiment.