Unconventional Warfare Research Paper

There is no doubt that guerrilla warfare played a significant part in the American victory over

I believe terrorism comes from hate as well; I also believe it is something that is taught as a justified act. This kind of hatred in most cases comes from many generations and is passed down the line. It is similar to racism because it stem from hatred as well. When individuals or groups of people can do violent harmful things against innocent people to me it is defined as hate. When you think about the different attacks against the United States you can clearly see the level of hatred they have for the American people. They are willing and ready to sacrifice their own lives in the name of terrorism. (111 words)

Suicide bombers, rebel groups, minefield clearers, and soldiers are words used to describe these children in a terrible situation. In places like Afghanistan, Iran, and Guantanamo Bay children as young as 5 years old are apprehended from their families, and are taken to army camps to fight against the U.S-backed government. These children are so innocent, but many think that they need to be arrested for what they are doing. Instead of playing on a playground with their families they are brainwashed, drugged, forced to kill, and poisoned with alcoholic beverages.

The combination of regular military forces, unconventional forces such as terrorist or insurgent groups, and criminal elements working together towards a common goal is what makes up a hybrid threat. In today’s current political and economic arenas very few of the United States’ enemies could mount an effective conventional military campaign against us. This has caused many of our enemies to turn towards using hybrid threats and tactics in order to further their attacks. The United States must in turn use hybrid tactics in order to defeat its enemies.

In this essay, I will support the JP 3-24’s current definition of insurgency. It defines an insurgency as “The organized use of subversion and violence by a group or movement that seeks to overthrow or force change of a governing authority.” In CW4 Sicard’s COIN class we discussed that insurgencies mobilizes people and other resources to form an alternative to the state or government. As my historical example to defend this definition of insurgency, I will use the American Revolutionary War. The American Revolutionary War was essentially waged by insurgents, which were present in all the American colonies, which were still controlled by the British at the time. We were legally subjects of the British crown, but we wanted to break free

Conventional warfare follows the single battle concept, where two or more well defined forces using weapons that target the opposing force. The contiguous battle-space is well defined with a deep, close and rear area allowing the force commander to array forces that can be visually displayed in a linear graphic. This does not hold true in an unconventional warfare, where the rear area may also be the close and deep fight and forces may target the civilian population either through direct, indirect or propaganda attacks. The will of the people play an important part in unconventional warfare and their support to either force is equally important. The Marine Air-Ground Task Force (MAGTF), the Marine Corps force in readiness is capable

Trench warfare is perhaps the defining fighting style of WWI, especially along the Western Front. In this type of warfare, soldiers would fight from within elaborate trench systems. This style emerged as the result of advancements in firepower that were not matched by advancements in mobility. Thousands of miles of trenches were dug throughout Europe and opposing sides constantly bombarded the other with artillery fire. For soldiers, life in the trenches was difficult and unhealthy; the muddy and unsanitary conditions and polluted water contributed to the spread of diseases, like dysentery and trench foot.

What happen in the Operation Desert Storm? You will learn all about this war in this paper.This paper will discuss Operation Desert Storm; the important events and how journalist described the war.

Trenches are a type of combat in which opposing troops fight from trenches facing each other. Trench warfare had been around for 100s of years before, but became huge during the Great War; the great is showing the large scale of conflict throughout the war. It was a war right after the turn of the century, between the new technologies, landscape of the land, and strategies used by each side trenches became an essential. This war did a lot more damage than anyone could have imagined. World War 1 was fought like no other war.

Trench warfare was a largely used tactic for fighting in WWI, 1914. Trenches are long, deep, narrow holes made in a complex, “zigzag” pattern, resembling that of a deep, elongated bunker (McCrackin). With trench warfare being so widely used, their growth allowed them to reach hundreds to thousands of miles all throughout Northern Europe. They were essentially a shield made from dirt walls reinforced with anything from sandbags to steel. They were usually protected by barbed wire and landmines.

In this article various pints were made on the concepts that the evolution of society and technology can affect the acts of crime, terror and warfare. Asymmetrical warfare has become a larger course taken that brings Transnational Criminal Organizations as well as Terror groups and PMCs on the level of Nation-States. The research question can be surmised as what is the distinction between crime, terrorism and warfare in the new changing dynamic and environment? The thesis is, the changes in society along with the additional evolution of technology, there is a conflict between traditional forms of conflict and criminal organizations as well as terror groups. These changes can make smallest threat a similar threat as a military from a Nation-State.

Irregular warfare has become the centre of much military and academic study in recent years, due mostly to the ongoing NATO operations in Afghanistan. However irregular warfare is by no means a recent revelation in the evolution of warfare and strategy, numerous examples exist throughout history in which irregular warfare tactics and strategy have been adopted and later analysed by academics and military professionals. This author will focus on the key issues that governments face in creating effective strategies for irregular warfare with a particular emphasis on counter-insurgency (COIN) and terrorism. Resources such as time, space, legitimacy and support present themselves as key issues in dealing with insurgency and terrorism and are

Army Special Forces soldiers were trained to organize and develop indigenous troops as guerrillas to harass, raid, and sabotage larger enemy forces over time to degrade and ultimately destroy their ability to fight. The Army considered guerilla warfare to be part of unconventional warfare … (p. 1).

Giulio Douhet, in his seminal treatise on air power titled The Command of the Air, argued, “A man who wants to make a good instrument must first have a precise understanding of what the instrument is to be used for; and he who intends to build a good instrument of war must first ask himself what the next war will be like.” The United States (US) military establishment has been asking itself this exact question for hundreds of years, in an attempt to be better postured for the future. From the Civil War, through the American Indian Wars, and up until World War II (WWII) the American military’s way of war consisted of fighting traditional, or conventional, wars focused on total annihilation of an enemy. Since that time, there has been a gradual shift from the traditional framework towards one that can properly address non-traditional, or irregular wars. While the US maintains a capability to conduct conventional warfare, the preponderance of operations where the US military has been engaged since WWII have been irregular wars. Therefore, this question articulated by Douhet, as to understanding the character of the next war in order to properly plan, train, and equip, is certainly germane to the current discussion of regular war versus irregular war. In today’s fiscally constrained environment, the questions remains, which will dominate the future and therefore, garner further funding and priority. Based on the current threats and the US role as a superpower, the US

“The hearts and mind (HAM) theory is identified as winning the hearts and minds of the population which is a technique based on the implementation of the counter-insurgency (COIN) strategy of persuading the population to support the government and reject the insurgents.” The counter-insurgency (COIN) strategy as outlined by President Obama and General Petraeus’s most closely embrace is the heart and minds (HAM) theory. President Obama speech identified the United States strategic approach with Afghanistan in three elements. The three core elements addressed by President Obama during his speech on the strategy in Afghanistan are identified as: 1) utilize the military effort to create conditions for transition, 2) a civilian surge that