Underrepresented Students Benefit From A Multicultural Education

Affirmative Action has become one of the most controversial issues regarding college admissions. It is an issue that exposes profiling to its highest extent. Race, gender and income now become vital factors in education opportunities. Affirmative Action is the procedure that is used as a criteria in admissions that will increase the points a college applicant receives on their application evaluation based on the previous factors. Whether race should be considered in the admission of a college applicant, is without a doubt a must in all states. Affirmative Action definitely will improve the opportunities of a minority student applying at a university but it will not be the deciding factor. When

Affirmative Action. For many Texas high school students, these two words haunt them. Their future, or at least their future at the University of Texas, depends on these words. For Abigail Noel Fisher, a 2008 graduate from Sugar Land, Texas, affirmative action and its race bias policies allegedly ruined her chances of getting into this prestigious state university. Fisher argues that race should not be a factor in college admissions processes, Fisher argues for equality. Equality in respect to race is in our constitution; it surrounds us everyday. In theory, race should be irrelevant in this day and age. Humanity has established that one race is not superior to another, so why should race matter at all in the college admissions process? Why should the University of Texas, or any other university, have that “check your race” box on their applications? Abigail Fisher, and every other person applying to the university, deserves as much opportunity as every other student of any race. When it comes to college, intelligence and character should be key to admission- not the color of the applicant’s skin. The University of Texas’ current affirmative action policy is an unfair college admissions process that the Supreme Court should ban so that admissions are based on intellectual ability in high school, national testing scores, extracurricular activities, and community service; this should be changed so that every person,

After the Civil Rights Act passed in 1964, affirmative action practices were incorporated into the college admissions process, with the objective of ending institutional discrimination based on race, creed, color or national origin. In the decades since, several court cases have refined the way that colleges and universities can address racial inequality in college admissions. Although the Supreme Court has generally supported diversity as a governmental and public interest, what that actually means in terms of incorporating diversity into the admissions process continues to be debated on at the highest level of government, on college campuses and in the courts. Many selective

For many the subject of affirmative action is worth protesting over, however, there are a few who would love to see the existence of affirmitive action abolished. Affirmative action has always been a long debated topic with two different communites arguing very different view points. Although affirmitive action can cause friction among many different opionated people, on the other hand, the results of the practice has ensured the college educations for many of minorities in America. Should this practice be allowed during the college admissions process is the question that remains to be debated. The right to attend college is considered to be a privilege for students who are able to enroll within a university of their choice. Those who

& Martinez, 2003). The Supreme Court ruled that the University of California was wrong in the way they approached a special admissions program that was open only to minority applicants (Aguirre Jr. & Martinez, 2003). The ruling argued that the special admissions program violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (Aguirre Jr. & Martinez, 2003). Justice Lewis Powell, Jr. stated in his opinion on the Bakke case that quotas “would hinder rather than further attainment of genuine diversity” (Aguirre Jr. & Martinez, 2003, p. 141). Justice Powell, Jr. also wrote that race is only one part of many factors that an institution can consider in truly achieving a heterogeneous student population (Aguirre Jr. & Martinez, 2003). By siding with Bakke in this case, the Supreme Court essentially outlawed the use of racial quotas in admissions processes in higher education, yet universities took this as it is okay to use race as a selective factor as long as there are no quotas (Aguirre Jr. & Martinez, 2003).

Affirmative Action is a program that needs to be ended, and at the very least needs to be drastically changed in order for it to truly help those who need it the most. Though Affirmative Action has many supporters, there are also those who oppose it just as strongly. Nowadays, every problem that arises in our country somehow gets tied back into race. College admission is something that should be based on merit, not on the issue of racial diversity. Though diversity in the classroom is essential to good discussion, diversity doesn’t just come through race. College “students meet classmates who have very different takes on the world than their own, who devote their energies to very different enterprises, and who exemplify different values

For nearly 50 years, the use of affirmative action for college admissions has been a controversial topic. Affirmative action is the policy of favoring the minority groups in an application pool in order to increase diversity in relation to education or employment.

As a testament to the next discussion point of opportunities, especially within the realm of college admission, I have experienced firsthand the opportunities presented by affirmative action. As a low-income, first-generation college student, Virginia Tech had offered me a full scholarship based solely on merit and financial need. As a “minority” according to Virginia Tech, I had an

In education, all affirmative action programs truly do is give the opportunity of higher education to those who would ordinarily not have the chance, but they do not crack open the books, do the work, or pass the tests. The real work is done by the students who are given the chance to grow and learn within the walls of some of the most prestigious universities in the United States. It is an opportunity some of them may not have had in different circumstances. The term “affirmative action” actually first appeared in the National Labor Relations Act, better known as the Wagner

Many would agree that Affirmative Action was meant to be a positive plan that helps compensate for the years of slavery and oppression. There are multiple ways that it accomplishes this, one of which gives certain students a “needed” boost in college admissions. Those who disagree with Affirmative Action would agree that it automatically assumes all blacks to be poor and all whites to be rich. Although Affirmative Action fails to notice it, believe it or not, there are rich black families out there whose children don’t need extra benefits and there are poor white families whose children could use those benefits instead.

Equality, which is the state of being equal, especially in status, rights, and opportunities, is now taking hold in our college admissions, but not enough. Just within the time people have used it, half a million more African-Americans have gotten into and earned degrees, colleges are now taking most of their focus to IQ, and there are now more African-American people with money in America.

Affirmative action is a way to make sure that colleges stay diverse to help create communities that are exposed to different colleges. It helps people who have a disadvantage create opportunities for themselves. It gives everyone an equal chance in all areas of their community. This is a way to make up for the oppression. This is to many help thee minorities that are admitted into universities or employed. The main focus was to make sure that everyone had an equal opportunities and help the level of discrimination go down. It has represented the minorities that aren’t being represented in any way shape or form. It’s way to help us reverse discrimination. According to the U.S. Department of Labor “Blacks and Latinos are more likely to

Imagine going through your school years working hard academically in hopes of going to a respectable college and broadening your horizons. Unfortunately, many students in America strive to reach this goal only to be rejected because the university had to meet a racial quota. Every year in America many students are turned down from colleges because the University was required to select a set amount of minorities before them thanks to something knows as affirmative action. On the other hand, you may be a minority who simply can’t earn the feeling of equality because of educational and employed handicaps. Affirmative action in our education system it an unjust practice that we can do without if we can learn to live in a color-blind society.

Even today, affirmative action remains a hotly debated topic. In early 2003, groups of college students held rallies and protests, in support of and opposing affirmative action, leading up to legal briefs concerning the University of Michigan’s admissions policy were due to the U.S. Supreme Court in the cases of Grutter v.

Affirmative action programs are initiatives geared towards improving the welfare of the marginalized groups in the society. Most of these policies often target education, health insurance, and employment. In the context of higher education, affirmative policies are programs that guarantee equal access to learning opportunities among the historically marginalized population sections, such as minorities and women (Goldin, 2014; Kantarjian, et al. 2014). Notably, there have been controversies surrounding the legality of affirmative action since critics claim that it violates the principles of reward based on merit (Kravitz, 2008). Nonetheless, the affirmative action ideology within the US is spot on as it addresses systemic inequalities in access to health care, the distribution of employment and education opportunities.