Understand The Common Process Of Appointing The Prime Minister

Decent Essays
The central focus of this essay is to understand the common process of appointing the Prime Minister, interpreting how Theresa May was selected and to comprehend as to whether or not this process was fair. Traditionally, the leader of the political party that can control a majority in the House of Commons, shall be appointed Prime Minister. ‘When a Prime Minister resigns, he or she advises the Queen’, however this is only a suggestion, she isn’t obliged. This is a rather inadequate factor as the Monarch has ‘Royal Prerogative’, a privilege of entitlement in appointing whoever she wishes to fulfil this role. As Harold Nicolson wrote in 1952 "When the head of a Government resigns, or is defeated in Parliament’, ‘the choice of his successor devolves upon the King alone’. Although the Queen can lawfully select anybody she wishes, this is overruled by constitutional conventions, a set of rules which guide her in this process. On June 23rd,2016 the results of the referendum called by David Cameron, changed the political landscape of England. David Cameron, former Prime Minister led the campaign to remain during the referendum, however he was unsuccessful and an incumbent Prime Minister. Thus he had to resign, ‘The Prime Minister resigned on Friday 24th June’. Theresa May…show more content…
The reason being is that she commanded a handsome amount of support in both rounds of her party’s vote. Her final contender Andrea Leadson left the race, leaving only Theresa May standing. The Conservative party was left without a leader and due to Theresa May being ‘a more cogent and experienced politician than the other candidates’, she was unequivocally the most suitable candidate for the role of the Prime Minister. This displays that this process was equal and at no point was it uncandid. Respectfully Westminster have remained democratic throughout the difficult circumstances relating to the resignation of David
Get Access