Understanding Ethical Behavior Paper

What is morality? Where does our sense of morality come from and why is it important for us to know? The cognitive scientist, psychologist, linguist, and scholar, Steven Pinker discusses this in his essay, “The Moral Instinct”. In this essay, Pinker claims that our morality sense is innate, it constantly changes, and it is universal among each culture. Pinker also explains that moral sense shapes our judgement as it is something that we value and seek in other people. The science of the moral sense is important since it shows how morality impacts our actions and it explains why we act in certain ways.

Moral intensity is the degree to which an issue demands the application of ethical principles. Decisions with high moral intensity have more significant ethical outcomes that affect more people, so the decision maker needs to more carefully apply ethical principles to make the best choice (Pg. 36). Therefore, Jack should have took into consideration the consequences of his actions good and bad and how many people would be affected by the decisions and consequences of his actions. Moral sensitivity which is also called ethical sensitivity is a characteristic of the person, namely his or her ability to detect a moral dilemma and estimate its relative importance. This awareness includes both cognitive logical thinking and emotional level awareness that something is or could become morally wrong (Pg. 36). The commentary in the documentary talked about the cognitive logical thinking and Jack’s emotional level of awareness in the film which cause him to commit several morally wrong crimes. When we don’t think logically and consider the consequences of our actions we normally set ourselves up for

The issue of ethical decision making has become more important in recent years for a variety of reasons. An understanding of ethical decision making in organizations is more significant to the development of organizational science. Managers engage in decision-making behavior affecting the lives and well-being of others. The individual responds to an ethical dilemma with cognitions determined by his or her cognitive moral development stage.

Most people would agree that we have moral obligations of attentiveness to some degree. However, problems arise when we consider how and where the boundaries of our obligations should be drawn. It would be well-intentioned to say that we should be concerned with every moral wrong being committed the world over, but that is simply infeasible. Jennie fully acknowledges this, saying that some degree of inattention is clearly necessary for human functioning. She suggests that the scope of our moral attentiveness be limited to violations of our morals which we are in some way implicated. Ultimately, she thinks we need to be aware of what our actions cause, and also what our actions unintentionally support. She further limits the boundaries of what we should reasonably be expected to attend to by saying that at the very least, we should attend to those violations which we are personally implicated in if we become aware that something is amiss and if we have some sort of power to affect it.

Be Ethically Conscious – Have an appreciation for the ethical dimensions and implications of one’s daily actions and decisions.

Rebecca Saxe’s Do the Right Thing: Cognitive Science’s Search for a Common Morality analyzes multiple research studies performed on the ethical ideas of morality. Saxe uses three current studies to validate her argument, including a Harvard internet study, research on the cognitive activity in the brains of an infant, and analysis of brain imaging using an fMRI. She uses logos and ethos in this essay to support her argument that scientific research will never fully explain the process that a human takes to make a sound, moral judgement, despite all of the innovative studies being performed. Saxe begins her argument by presenting a scenario that helps the reader to further understand the topic being discussed: moral dilemmas. The scenario includes

In this paper, I am going to explain what two moral theories I mainly use to make a moral decision. In this paper, I used the textbook to help me figure out what moral theories are and it helped me decide which moral theories to use that best fit me when I make moral decisions. The two moral theories that I chose to highlight in this paper are utilitarianism and cultural relativism because I believe that they are the two that best fit me when I make a moral decision. The definition of morals is “a person’s standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is or is not acceptable for them to do”. Morals are an important thing to have because it is good to know what is and isn’t

Explain how the criminal justice system (Cops, Courts, or Corrections) is establishing and maintaining ethical standards to address unethical behaviors. The criminal justice system is comprised of three major institutions which process a case from inception, through trial, to punishment. Though a number of rights derived from the Constitution protect the accused from abuses and overreaching from law enforcement officer. Much like the law enforcement stage of a case, there are dozens of restrictions on the court's ability to prosecute a case, including the right to confront one's accusers, the right against incriminating one's self.

This paper will compare the usefulness of character-based and consequence-based approaches in making moral decisions. In a character-based approach, the consideration of the moral agent is central in making decisions, and actions are made in order to reflect and strengthen good character. In a consequence-based approach, the consideration of the outcome is central in making moral decisions, and actions are judged based on the outcome. Usefulness will be defined in terms of three aspects: consistency, convenience and assurance, with assurance being defined as the confidence that the decision made is correct. Through the comparison of the two approaches, it becomes clear that a character-based approach is more useful in making a decision.

When an individual is proposed with a moral dilemma they will often seek the advice of others rather than acting solely upon their immediate cultural, familial, and cognitive predispositions; suggesting that judgments are also made about the moral judgments of others (Rest, Cooper, Coder, Masanz & Anderson, 1974).

Ethical behavior is significant to the development of persuasion, and important to the behavior of humans.It also influences persuasion by developing the progression of persuasion, and increasing those who are accountable for it. A person’s ethical behavior originates with morals and changes into what way an individual is required to connect to encourage effectively and dependably and finishes with who obligation it is to take responsibility in a persuasive interchange. The significance of our ethical behavior is realized within all our origins as human beings and stands as the groundwork of our different societies. We are directed by our ethical customs in the cultures which we create and live. “ The persuader’s determined actions means more under deontological ethics than under teleological ethics”( Magee,2014). According to David B. Resnik, J.D.,( 2011), ethics is defined as standards for behavior that differentiate between tolerable and intolerable conduct. Ethical morals of behavior that specify how an individual should conduct them self centered on ethical responsibilities and qualities.

Ethics has developed as people have reflected on the intentions and consequences of their acts. From this reflection on the nature of human behavior, theories of conscience have developed, giving direction to much ethical thinking. Each individual

In this paper, I am going to discuss the importance of ethical behavior and its significance in persuasion. I will also define two ethical theories and

From the reading, I understand that people think and act differently when faced with ethical issues. For one to make a rational decision, an extensive process of judgment is required (Bandura, Caprara, & Zsolnai, 2000). For an individual to be responsible, he or she should put into consideration the magnitude of the consequences of the actions, social

Consciousness: Awareness about the action takes place and also applies the moral principles on daily basis.