Understanding Facial Expressions Of Emotion

Science released an article entitled “Facial Expressions—Including Fear—May Not Be as Universal as We Thought”, written by Michael Pierce on October 17, 2016. In this article Pierce discusses how 50 years ago it was assumed that facial expressions were universal. However, it has been found that in the present day, this may not be the case. Expressions such as happiness, anger, sadness, fear, disgust, or hunger, were all assumed to be expressed the same way as well as interpreted the same way. A study was conducted in the Trobriand Islands, were Trobrianders were shown as series of photos with facial expressions. They were asked to describe the emotions they interpreted from the photos, the results were intriguing. Pierce (2016) describes how

The overall results collected by 257 students for each of the expression is roughly 2.8 for frown, 3.2 for neutral, and 3.9 for smile, each data at a statistically significant p-value of 0.001. This result disproves the norm of reciprocity theory in the hypothesis since a frown received a response closer to neutral.

The article shows how women’s emotions can and cannot be related to when they smile. The author gives detailed examples on how woman are perceived as always smiling and in no way in a terrible mood. Cunningham shows how in the past women is not always having happy facial expressions because of the need to seem harmless. Despite the evidence given to us by the author, Cunningham still explains that she wants women to smile in the future whether or not it’s a smirk or a

Porter and Brinke (2008) found that inconsistent facial expression during police interrogations, occurred more frequently as a form of masked expression than a true genuine expression. They stated that masking an emotion is more difficult to appear than unemotional expression in situations of deception. The reasoning is that the leakage of in emotion in the lower face was more frequent than those that were in the genuine expressions (2008). Masked expression had a higher blink rate than those who had a neutral expression. For the neutral expressions, they found that the blink rates were lower. The blink rates are suggested that they can describe what type of lie it is (emotional) and being aware of the context are important when looking at

The human face is dynamically expressive. With the forty-two muscles of the face constantly moving, minute variations in expression can convey an expansive breadth of emotion. Despite this, some individuals seem to be able to utilize these muscles far better than others. Some individuals naturally seem to emit more emotional exuberance through their face, than others. Thus, an inquiry into the perceived degrees of emotions conjured on an individual’s face could have vast implications. Ebner, He & Johnson (2011) conducted an experiment, which sought to test our cognitive system’s sensitivity to the differences in the levels of emotion that younger faces conveyed, when compared to older faces. They

Facial Action Coding System is a facial activity investigation framework that is generally acknowledged amongst researches. The framework or the system was initially created for mental purposes instead of computerized FER. It was proposed by Paul Ekman and Wallace V. Friesen in 1978. The essential key of the framework is to separation facial muscle ranges into 11 sections, and muscle development in those parts without hesitation units. The beginning framework had 44 AUs running from 1 to 26.

Two studies from 2002 and 2011 at Uppsala University in Sweden confirmed that other people’s smiles actually suppress the control we usually have over our facial muscles, compelling us to smile. They also showed that it’s very difficult to frown when looking at someone who smiles. These findings would not have surprised Charles Darwin, who in addition to theorizing on evolution in The Origin of the Species, also developed the Facial Feedback Response Theory, which suggests that the act of smiling actually makes us feel better (rather than smiling being merely a result of feeling

Time flies when you are having fun, as the old adage says, may have some real psychological value behind it. Do angry faces seems to resonate for longer periods of time as compared to happy faces? How does this distortion occur with the time passage of time identical in both scenarios? We frequently encounter emotional facial expressions in our daily lives. These facial expressions help us to judge an individual’s attitudes and feelings. But is there really a time distortion between angry and happy faces, and how does this time distortion occur?

recognition is a heightened attention bias towards negative emotion which contribute to emotion disorders and promote substance abuse.

Facial expressions in my life are the best describer of how I feel and think about a situation. Most of my friends would say that I am a positive person that smiles when I am around other people; however, my resting face looks like I am mad at the world. I did realize this until someone took a picture and I was in the background looking utterly disgusted with life. Also, my facial expressions are extremely exaggerated; for instance, when I am surprised it is full on, mouth open and eyes wide. My friends tell me that when someone is speaking that I do not agree with or dislike, that it will make expressions of confusion or disgust. I am working on changing that, because it is important to have a neutral face in the professional world. Another

That suggestion is good advice because smiling gives off positive vibes towards other people. It is not good to bring down others because your life is gloomy. In addition, several claims state that our emotional expressions are universal. One factor to further its claim is that all cultures around the world show six basic forms of expressions called happiness, surprise, sadness, anger, disgust and fear. Paul Eckman stated that basic emotions are innate and hardwired to the brain. According to the facial-affect program, facial expressions display when a set of nerve impulses activate. Specific muscles react to a different emotion, such as someone smiling activates the muscles called the zygomaticus. Most importantly, facial-feedback hypothesis

They determined that: “The husband’s Fear, Sadness, and the total number of his facial action units were associated with his higher HR, whereas for the wife’s HR, her husband’s Felt Happiness expressions (and marginally hers) were associated with her lowered HR” (Gottman, 2001). I find it very interesting that the man’s heart rate was affected by his own facial expressions, but the women’s heart rate was affected more by her own facial expressions. This shows how important expression recognition is in social

I am very careful with facial expressions because I want to create a friendly and harmonious environment around me. When I've been around other people, I've never tried to show faces expressing inattention, anxiety, anger, mockery, and laziness. Since I want people to take my ideas seriously, I always try to use facial expressions that show positivity, motivation, happiness, and energy. When I participate in online teamwork, people may not see my facial expressions, but they can perceive my desire to make things right, and the respectful attitude that I

The aim of the present study was to investigate which hemisphere is specialised for the perception of emotion. It was hypothesised that participants will judge chimeric faces with smile presented in the left visual field as happier more often than chimeric faces with the smile presented in the right visual field. Twenty-six psychology students were asked to judge chimeric faces with one half being a smiling expression and the other half with a neutral expression. The images were presented in their left and right visual field. Over 28 experimental trials the participants were asked to judge which face they thought looked happier. The percentage of chimeric faces judged as happier for both left and right visual field was recorded. The hypothesis was supported: chimeric faces with smile presented in the left visual field as happier more often than chimeric faces with the smile presented in the right visual field.

Facial expressions are a means for communication for people. You can interpret and understand what a person is feeling by looking at his or her face. If its laughter, fear, disgust, happiness, anger, tiredness or even cheerfulness you can understand what a person is feeling. What is interesting about facial expressions is that they are universal and not limited to one culture or one region. Being able to recognize different facial expressions is an important element for survival and for communication. However, one might consider the difficulty that Parkinson’s patients face in recognizing different facial expressions. Scientifically speaking, Parkinson’s disease is a degenerative disorder in the central nervous system. Parkinson’s primary effect relates to the efficiency of neurons in the brain, which gradually diminishes with time, causing the chemical that is produced from these neurons to stop. These chemicals are involved with the movement and motor skills of the patient. As a result, the movement of the patient is then compromised, causing the patient to experience symptoms like shaking, shivering, and postural instability (Parkinson’s Disease Foundation, 2015). Studies have been trying to support the notion of an evident relationship between Parkinson’s disease and the recognition of particular facial expressions, followed by a wide variety of results that were concluded. For instance, some studies have concluded that Parkinson’s affects only the recognition of anger