Understanding Inequalities Of London 's Life Expectancy And Healthy Lives Expectancy

In the movie Unnatural Causes: In Sickness and in Wealth, it compared the lives of four individuals, Taylor, Young, Anderson, and Turner, in different locations, race, and socioeconomic background. The scale of difference between this group of people is that it goes from financially stable and healthy individuals to individuals with lower income and poorer health. This wealth-health gradient reflects that those who have easier access to healthier lifestyles (i.e. running outside without the concern of safety) are more likely to have a higher life expectancy than those who are in living environments that are not as developed and lack healthier options of nutrition. The difference of the average life expectancy scaled down from Jim Taylor whose neighborhood had an average life expectancy of 80 years, Young’s 75.3 years,

Socio-economic class or socio-economic status (SES) may refer to mixture of various factors such as poverty, occupation and environment. It is a way of measuring the standard and quality of life of individuals and families in society using social and economic factors that affect health and wellbeing ( Giddens and Sutton, 2013). Cockerham (2007 p75) argues: ‘Social class or socioeconomic status (SES) is the strongest predictor of health, disease causation and longevity in medical sociology.’ Research in the 1990s, (Drever and Whitehead, 1997) found out that people in higher SES are generally healthier, and live longer than those in lower SES.

“Health is a state of complete physical, mental, spiritual and social wellbeing, and not just the absence of disease” (WHO, 1974). Health inequalities are the differences in health or healthcare opportunities in different societies this may be due to income,

In the “Marmot Review: Fair Society Healthy Lives” written by “Professor Michael Marmot” himself, he proposes the most effective evidence-based strategies for reducing health inequalities in England. Inequality is unjust and unfair and therefore it is a matter of social justice in cases where everyone has an equal,social, political and economical rights and opportunities.He simply stated that to reduce the steepness of the gradient sufficiently “actions must be universal, but with a scale and intensity that is proportionate to the level of disadvantage” Even though resources may be scarce and it is tempting to focus these limited resources on the most needy, we are eliminating some parts of the society and therefore only tackling a small part of the overall problem. Part of his solution was to “implement an evidence-based programme of ill health preventive interventions that are effective across the social gradient such as Increasing and improving the scale and quality of treatment programmes and focusing on public health interventions such as smoking cessation programmes on reducing the social gradient” Michael Marmot also raises the benefits to which reducing health inequalities will help the economy as well as socially. “It is estimated that inequality in illness accounts for productivity losses of £31-33 billion per year, lost taxes and higher welfare payments in the range of £20-32 billion per

People were less likely to face poor retirement if they worked in managerial or professional jobs than someone who worked in unskilled or manual occupations. This is because the people who worked in manual would have earned lower wages and would not be as likely to get a private pension. Men that are in the professional classes have a life expectancy of 80 years from birth. However men from unskilled or manual classes have a life expectancy of 78.1 years. This also effects woman’s life expectancy as woman from professional classes have a life expectancy of 85.1 compared to those who are in the unskilled or manual classes and their life expectancy if 78.1 years. Causes of death also vary from different social classes. In the higher social classes it is less likely to suffer from, lung cancer, coronary heart disease, stokes and respiratory diseases. All of these increase within social disadvantages.

There has always been a link between social class and health, even with the welfare state and the improvements made to health in all sections of societies over the years, a difference still remains in this area. This difference is applied to all aspects of health, which include life expectancy, general levels of health and infant mortality. Many people argue that as long as the quality of life is

The North and South divide may be influenced by the population. According to wikipedia, there are 14.5 million citizens currently living in the North of England, with a staggering 8 million people living in London alone. As there are evidently much more residents in the South of England this may be why there’s a lot more money there, it also may be down to the fact London is the capital and a worldwide attraction. According to ‘The Mirror’ there report released that the average annual wage for someone in the North East of england is £24,084 and for a London citizen is £35,238. The UK overall have a typical annual salary of £27,017, the difference in income would definitely affects someone's lifestyle and there opportunities.

These disparities are obvious in some key measures of wellbeing including life expectancy, the risk for disease, and access to health care (Disparities in Health, 2015). Historically, the major factors contributing to shorter longevity and high rates of disease are overcrowding, poor sanitation and low availability of treatment facilities. However, the change of theses socioeconomic

First, there is Jim Taylor, Hospital CEO, District 16; second, Tondra Young, Clinical Lab Supervisor, District 24; lastly, Corey Anderson, Floor Technician, District 21. The population of each district decreases in average income, education level and life expectancy than its preceding district, beginning with district 16, Jim Taylor’s district. District 16 has an average combined household income of approximately $120,000/ annually. In this district, 65% of the population has a college degree and the life expectancy in this district is 82 years. Whereas, Tondra Young’s district, district 24, has an average combined household income of $70,000/annually and 15% of the population has a college degree. The life expectancy of district 24 is 75 years, that’s 7 years less than district 16. In district 21, Corey Anderson’s district, the average combined household income is less than $50,000/ annually and only 5% of the districts population have college degrees. Consequently, the life expectancy of district 21 is 70 years, 5 years less than district 24 and 12 years less than district 16 (Adelman 2008). The results of this study are indisputable: there is an obvious correlation between social/economic status and health status. As each districts average income and education level decrease, average life expectancy coincides. This leads to the next question: why does social and economic status so greatly influence health status?

There are many different reasons why health inequalities exist due to many factors one extremely important one is social class. Socio-economic inequalities have been researched in the UK for many years. In the early 20th century the government started an occupational census which gave the researchers the opportunity to examine health outcomes of social class. The five class scheme was introduced in 1911 and a variation has been used since. In 2001 the National Statistics Socio Economic Classification replaced the older version. Social class is a name used to identify people who are similar in their income

Summary: Despite Cardiff and Leicester having very similar populations, there are vast differences in regards to the two cities’ state of health. Cardiff and Leicester display a similar level of both smoking and alcohol consumption, however, the data collected shows that Cardiff has a significantly higher life expectancy in comparison to Leicester. Leicester’s population is largely more physically active than that of Cardiff’s, with 20% more adults engaging in regular exercise. In addition, Leicester has fewer overweight adults as well as a lower rate of adult obesity when compared to Cardiff. Furthermore, Leicester is significantly more deprived than Cardiff, the correlation of this data as a whole may suggest that deprivation could

Health inequalities are preventable and unjust differences in health status experienced by certain population groups. People in lower socio-economic groups are more likely to experience health inequalities than people in higher socio-economic classes. Health inequalities are not only found between people of different

Inequalities in health still exist and are mainly blamed on the stratification system in the UK. The Black Report suggested there were 4 main reasons for this:

The male population of Middlesbrough have an estimated life expectancy of 76 years old compared to the UK average of 79 years old. Correspondingly, the female population of Middlesbrough are estimated to have a life span of 79 years, compared to the UK average of 83 years old (Health and Social Care Information Centre, 2013). Life expectancies in Middlesbrough maybe disadvantaged due to the lifestyle of those living there; low quality housing and inadequate lifestyle choices are all contributive factors. Middlesbrough’s Council Private Sector Survey (2008) discovered; 41.2% houses are in need of repair, 49.4% of dwellings were poorly insulated and 38.7% homes are classified as non- decent. Consequently, insufficient living conditions increase

The figure shows that the life expectancies have improved dramatically from 1925 and 1975 for the younger population, although advancement in healthcare did not make much of an effect on the elderly population during that time. Meanwhile at age 90, the probability of survival increased significantly to about 20% in 2010 and will continue to rise due to improvements in medicine. Although current evidence confirms that the population today are living longer, many are doing so in reduced health. Report shows that the population aged 65 and over struggle to manage their day-to-day activities without assistance. Health life expectancy considers mortality rates as well as the effect of nonfatal conditions.