Understanding Professional Skepticism

The issue of physician professionalism has been the subject of heated debate for many years. This is because the term professionalism often has different meanings to different people. While the dictionary’s definition of professionalism is “engaged in one of the learned professions,” in medicine the term goes beyond just being engaged in the medicine profession. This has led some researchers to claim that professionalism is hard to define but easy to recognize. In medicine, professionalism factors in the relationship between medicine and the community and constitutes the foundation of the trust between the patient and physician. According to Coulehan (2005), professionalism attempts to bring to light certain attitudes, behaviors, and

Professionalism is a (1) Theoretical knowledge on which practical or skill based activity rests, considering this, I applied my theoretical knowledge such as differentiate, individual needs into my practice. (2) Professionalism is formal, accredited qualification, providing grounding in theoretical knowledge; according to these, I am doing my assignments and voluntary teaching practice to obtain a certificate. (3) Licence to practice or some proof of occupational competence; according to this, I showed my Confirmation of Student Enrolment on Initial Teacher Training letter to my manager to get a voluntary teaching practice. (4) Professionalism is a code of professional conduct or practice; I follow my organisation’s rules and regulations such as health and safety rules, equality and diversity, time keeping, etc. (5) Professionalism is a professional body that represents the interests of practitioners and regulates their activity in some way, in my teaching practice their awarding bodies are Tinder Foundation, BBC Learning English and British Council. They regulate my organisation’s lesson plans and activities in some way and I follow them. (handouts, 2014)

If You Need Love, Get A Puppy 1. PCAOB describes professional skepticism as a general duty of care that needs to be applied by the auditor throughout the duration of the audit engagement. Professional skepticism involves the auditor having a clear and questioning mind regarding the assertions that are presented by management or other client personnel. The auditor is instructed to not take the words or data presented by management as sufficient and appropriate audit evidence but rather the auditor needs to thoroughly audit the evidence with a questioning mind to achieve reasonable assurance about the persuasiveness of the evidence. Skepticism is composed of three elements; auditor attributes, mindset and actions. The PCAOB

Firstly, however, the meaning of the term ‘professional standard’ must be established. There are standards that all professions must follow. These are to do with ethics and values. At the very least, standards of professionalism indicate a level of “expertise”, separating those who are considered professional from the amateur. Merely deriving an income from writing a review is not proof that a professional standard has been met. The NSW Professional Standards Council claims that any attempts to define standards of professionalism “typically centralise around some sort of moral or ethical foundation within the practice of a specific and usually established expertise”.

A professional is characterized by or conforming to the technical or ethical standards of a profession (2) : exhibiting a courteous, conscientious, and generally businesslike manner in the workplace. Being professional should be a subconscious effort in the fact that it should always be applied. When employees are professional it helps the system run more efficiently and safely. A person must me a certain criteria when being evaluated on professionalism, a person is judged based on the clients; Attitude, Values, Communication techniques, and approachability. Clients who display a committed, dependable attitude will benefit more from work exerted, and overall be rewarded with incentives. Although professionalism may be in the eye of the

Professionalism What does Professionalism mean to me? Professionalism in my term means it is someone who is very dedicated to their profession. It is an important and great decision to follow by the rules and ethics of professionalism. If we did not have anyone that cared about their profession it would cause a lot of problems in our society today. It could cause a lot of disruption in your workplace. In order to abide by professionalism you must take pride in your job, percieve realistic goals and values, and know what your expectations are.

In addition, evidence covers admissibility, burden of proof, relevance, sufficiency and weight of what could be admitted into the

Definition of Professional Skepticism PCAOB standards explain professional skepticism as an Challenges to Professional Skepticism A commonplace argument as to why professional skepticism isn’t always as accepted because it ought to be that the limitations are too excessive. A number of barriers have been recognized internationally.

The Gutenberg printing press transformed ancient scrolls into Begin examination by reviewing the author, as certain types of sources, such as scientific or medical journals, will require an author to hold credentials not necessary to other source types. A thorough vetting ensures an author stands up to scrutiny. Two key factors to evaluating content are date of material and potential biased. Medical, scientific and legal fields require up to date information with no biased whereas literature or historical sources need not always be the most current. Sourcing for literature or historical research must account for potential biased attitudes of the period. The intended audience of a source can also assist or diminish overall credibility. Sources reviewed and accepted by peer groups add authoritative weight to the source. Author, audience and content each represent a vital component to ensuring your source credibility.

Research papers are a part of every student’s life. Some students may like the research papers but the others may not. But in the end a decent research paper would be the sources that make the paper credible. A lot of articles are not credible due to some areas. The areas include: the credibility of the author, the sources that were cited throughout the paper, how reliable the content is and a reliable publisher also how current and how accessible the article is. The author would be credible by being knowledgeable about the topic being spoken about. Furthermore, for the author to be credible, the author would have to be adding some outside sources that will give the article more credibility. Not only would the sources would make the paper credible

In Philosophy, certain words convey specific meanings. Here, I will define these terms.The word skepticism, relates to the idea as we do not have the knowledge to be certain of anything, our beliefs become unjustifiable. A skeptical scenario has to be consistent with evidence, and if it is true then these beliefs would be unjustified. Rene Descartes “Meditations on First Philosophy” is a philsophical treatise, which is a formal written discourse on Descartes skeptical scenario. G.E. Moore’s ‘Proof of an External World’ is an essay Moore wrote. The

I first look at the information in the article to see if it comes off as biased or if it comes as neutral. I make sure there isn't any extreme information that is obviously incorrect and I check to make sure it professionally written such as no grammatical errors or misspellings. After that I look for numbers and graphs that back up the information used in the paper. If I am still skeptical of the information I will look deeper into the authors background and check out his credentials such as his job, where he went school, what his major was and anything else relevant. If this all checks out then I will more and likely use it as a source in my paper. I found one article that I found to be completely biased and not credible at all. I the article was titled “Why Welfare Sucks” on a website called “God Fearing Christian Man.” This article is already biased before I started reading the bulk of the paper. There were several cuss words and other questionable pictures in the article which were clearly red flags. The article continued on with a personal account of his welfare experience which could have been useful if it was presented in a better way. A few other read flags I noticed were the lack of numbers to back his claims and the website looked like something a 5 year old could have

In most cases as a young person, you just believed that what they told you was true. As we matured, we started thinking about situations using our own thoughts in work and in personal life. We still listen and follow instructions when a superior in the workplace explains a situation to you, in most cases you will probably not question the statement. However, some of us (myself included) like to express our personal experience in the situation and look to make changes or possibly even agree with the path that was chosen on the subject. From our assignment, the question asked which one of the following I would rely on the most to support my opinion, people of authority, recorded references, observed evidence, or personal experience. Because I can only chose, one I would select recorded references, only because the information is from experiences. To add on to the subject, a keyword makes the difference in how a person would select the information to use. That word is experience, without experience, no one knows what will be the result of the

It causes wonder if this really closes the gap between people being able to form their own opinions on unfiltered, objective information. That’s not necessarily the case because if anything, it forces us to speculate both sides of an argument completely and totally. Having the capacity to argue both sides of an argument makes a person fully able to decide what their opinion is on a matter. The more information someone has on a topic, the easier it is to decide. This is a new-age thinking tool that many people from past generations do not have the capacity of doing. If we only have information from one side of the argument, then how can someone argue irrefutably? Fully forming an opinion on a topic means knowing both sides of a story.

1. Recognition 2. Questioning min and a critical assessment of the evidence and 3. Commitment to persuasive evidence Professional skepticism practices as neutral but discipline approach to detection and investigation. Per SAS No. 1 it suggests that an auditor neither assumers that management is dishonest or assumes unquestionable honesty. Professional skepticism requires fraud examiners to “pull on thread” in which means Red flags are warning signal or something that demands attention or provokes an irate reaction. Red Flag symptoms of fraud may be divided into at least six categories: unexplained accounting anomalies, exploited internal control weaknesses, identified analytical anomalies where non