Understanding the Results: Breakdown of the Stroop Effect

1199 WordsJan 8, 20185 Pages
Understanding the Results: The Breakdown of the Stroop Effect The beauty of science is the fact that it is not ever a complete certainty. There are times when an experiment might yield results that conflict with prior results in past experiments, which then forces the researcher to try to account for the possibility of new findings that lay outside the range of prior discourse. This is the case here, where a variation of the Stroop test was conducted, with atypical results. After coming to these different conclusions, it was the work of the researcher to dive into the research and try to understand what could have happened to provide such different conclusions. In this case, there might have been embedded cues that would have lead to a greater interference of the Stroop effect. Understanding our own cognitive powers has proved a difficult task for scientists since the birth of science itself. Our minds work in very complex ways, and we are still trying to understand the relationships that drive our cognition and memory. One such theory is known as the Stroop effect. This came about in the 1030s when an experiment revealed that "naming the print color of color words is impaired by the meaning of the words, although reading the words is not similarly hindered by irrelevant print color" (Dishon-Berkovits & Algom, 2000, p 1437). Essentially, the concept here is that our attention derives from different visual and cognitive clues, and that some are more dominant over

More about Understanding the Results: Breakdown of the Stroop Effect

Open Document