Undocumented Immigrants Of The United States Essay

After a research study was conducted that claimed immigration growth impacted the U.S economy in a positive way many states took matter into their own hands. They started passing laws that attracted immigrants to their states since they saw lack of progression for immigration reform in congress. In 2013 some states started allowing undocumented immigrants to obtain drivers license, while other states, like Oregon, allowed in state college tuition for undocumented students. A research study conducted by Bipartisan Policy Center in October 2013 revealed that if

Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival (DACA) was a program that was started by President Obama and his administration on June 12, 2012 however; it did not go into effect until August 15, 2012. The purpose of the program is to provide a two year temporary relief of deportation and opportunities for unlawful immigrant youth to work legally in the United States. Some requirements of this program is that the youth be under the age of 31, was in the U.S. before age 16, must be obtaining an education or have a High School Diploma/GED and be present during the time this program is being initiated (Batolova, J, Capps, Bachmeler, Cox, E., 2013, p.1-2). Youth under DACA are allowed to obtain a driver’s license. One of the main concerns of this program is that it does not lead towards citizenship.

Heinrich & Arkin’s article on the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA Program addresses the current and possible future changes following the announcement of the “wind down” of the current program. The article instructs that we look ahead to examine the possible future immigration policy affecting the legal status of unauthorized immigrants. Understanding the implementation, execution, changing and outcomes of the DACA program is important for anticipating and understanding how the DAPA program and any future policy changes will unfold differently across metropolitan areas

Prior to the creation of SB1070, Arizona has had many incidents of undocumented immigrants crossing its borders. Until the early 20th century, the U.S government took over the responsibilities of immigration control (Carroll, 2011). According to Chin and Miller (2011), harboring aliens or undocumented immigrants into the United States is considered a felony crime. Originally within the federal jurisdiction to handle such immigration offenses, the shift of responsibilities has now been shared with the state of Arizona (Chin and Miller, 2011). To prevent undocumented immigrants from crossing the borders and combat many smuggling cases of undocumented immigrants, vigilantism was motivated within the state of Arizona through the criminalization of undocumented immigrants (Frassinelli, Frenkell, & Watson, [Immigration and “Operations”: The Militarization (and Medicalization) of the US-Mexico Border] 2011).

illegally with tremendous benefits. Edmund Kozak, political reporter for lifezette.com in an article on April 8, 2016 ' 'States to Illegal Aliens Welcome ' ' argued that unfortunately, many States have decided to go into the business of encouraging illegal immigration. Some 605,000 of the roughly 1.4 million driver 's license issue in California last year went to illegal aliens. Kozak said that the cost of the processing of the new applicants is estimated at $ 141 million over three years. This cost will be supported by the legal citizens of California because the State did not require those undocumented to pay taxes. Undoubtedly, these allegations might be dictated by the stereotypes which are used against undocumented immigrants, and unfortunately, many people are blinded by the ' 'single story ' ' about these hardworking people. If legal citizens paid for the fees related to driving licenses, why would it be different for undocumented drivers? If undocumented people accepted to work and pay federal taxes without the same benefits as other legal workers, why would they not pay for their driving license? In States that issue permits to undocumented aliens, the policy has largely self-funded; i.e., fees collected from applicants pay for the costs of issuing the permit explained in the Boston Editorial Immigration has Nothing to do with Driving Skills. Based on that, it is clear that the license would not be funded by the State but by the applicants themselves.

DACA has already had many positive impacts; young adult immigrants have become more integrated into the nation’s economic and social institutions (Two Years, 2014). Almost 60% of DACA beneficiaries have obtained a new job, 45% have increased their earnings, 49% have opened their first bank account, 57% have obtained a driver’s license, and 21% have obtained Health Care (Two Years, 2014). In a recent CAP report, “Assessing the Economic Impacts of Granting Deferred Action through DACA and DAPA,” estimates have shown that the U.S. economy will cumulatively grow by $230 billion over 10 years and will have the following economic impact on Idaho: a cumulative increase in state GDP of $781 million, a cumulative increase in earnings of all state residents of $481 million, and a cumulative increase in earnings of DAPA and DACA eligible workers of $401 million, and an average of 100 jobs created annually (Mathema, 2015). Despite the potential positive impacts, the U.S Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will not be accepting expansion of the DACA programs at this time, due to an injunction with the courts putting a hold on the policy (USCIS, 2016). Therefore, undocumented immigrants continue to face bleak social and economic opportunities.

By allowing illegal immigrants to get driver's licences it is allowing them to take up the roads which can sometimes lead to car accidents. Recent statistics say that there are currently more than 62,000 illegal

When Massachusetts' citizen will understand that a driver's license is not a green card? The undocumented immigrants topic become a public one across the United States. Further, the idea of granted driver's license to these undocumented immigrants is an even more highly controversial matter in many States including Massachusetts. A driver's license is an authorization given to state' residents after they have been tested and proven that they can operate a vehicle safely. Nevertheless, this privilege comes with requirements. In other that, having a driving license is a legal barrier for undocumented immigrants because they do not meet the requirements. Massachusetts remains one of the State in the U.S. with a high population driving without

In April 2010, the state of Arizona passed what is now known as the most controversial immigration enforcement law. The “Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act”, later referenced as SB 1070, required immigrants to carry they registration document on their person at all times. This would seem like reasonable expectation, that one must always carry identification documents on them. However, the controversy surrounds the part of the bill that “requires police to question people if there’s reason to suspect they are in the U.S. illegally” (Bash, 2010). This created a statewide discrimination against Latinos as well as other who looked to be of foreign descent.

In 2010, the Arizona Senate introduced a bill that would become one of the strictest and anti-illegal immigration bills ever to be debated, and eventually implemented in the United States. The bill, usually referred to as Arizona Bill 1070, requires all aliens to carry their registration documents at all times. 1070 makes it a state misdemeanor for an alien to be in Arizona without carrying the required documents and bars state or local officials or agencies from restricting enforcement of federal immigration laws. It also cracks down on those sheltering, hiring and transporting illegal aliens. The United States government should implement this bill at the federal level.

In 1994 the the ability to apply for licenses in California was revoked. Immigrants were relegated to continuing their daily lives which meant operating a motor vehicle without a license. Regrettably, this has resulted in deportations, arrests, vehicle impoundments and even some tickets.

The author talks of an encounter that is all too familiar for the readers in the desert when talking about a corrupt DMV. Anyone who wishes to schedule a driving test appointment at the Palm Desert DMV must schedule their appointment three months in advance because of the overflow of illegal aliens receiving documents at

Illegal immigration is the hot button this election year in Arizona. As the fight to pass new law rages on, other states are watching and eager to follow suit. The focus is on federal laws already in effect and how state and local officials should have the ability to enforce these laws. Arizona strives to make illegal immigration a crime vs. a violation. Parts blocked by Judge Bolton include making it a crime to be without proof of citizenship, and it would also be a crime for an illegal immigrant to apply for or accept work. Passed into law are tougher sanctions on employers who hire illegal immigrants. Many Arizonians are in favor of reducing the illegal population but the question remains what is in the best interest of American society. Tougher sanctions on employers are necessary to stop the overflow of illegal immigrants crossing the borders. In passing this new legislation it makes it unnecessary for Arizona to make it a crime for illegal immigrants to apply for and accept work. It is reasonable to enforce federal law requiring legal aliens to carry documentation; however it does not need to be elevated to a criminal offense.

In recent years there had been more and more immigration related laws imposed by state governments. In 2012 there were nearly 1,000 immigration bills presented, 156 laws were instituted and 111 resolutions were approved (National Conference of State Legislatures, 2015). In 2013 this increased with 184 laws being enacted and 253 resolutions being approved. Immigration issues encompassing employment, identification/drivers’ licenses, and law implementation were top property in states (National Conference of State Legislatures, 2015).

10) There is a group called the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund that supports Cedillo 's idea of allowing illegal aliens to posses driver 's licenses, but feel that there should not be any background checks or other restrictions(Kline par. 13). The MALDEF feel that every citizen of Mexico coming into California should receive a license, whether they are criminals or not. The old bill, AB 1463, was vetoed in the year 2000 by former Governor Gray Davis. Davis stated that AB 1463 was an "invitation for fraud (House par. 9)." But once Davis 's job was starting to crumble, he decided to pass the new bill ,AB 60, to try and gain more support from legal and illegal Hispanics in the state of California before he was recalled. After what had happened on September 11, 2001, Gil Cedillo withdrew the bill from Gray Davis 's files. However, recently the new governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger, has been trying to bring a new a bill with more qualifications ,such as a special mark on the licenses to indicate that the holder is illegal, to help bring driver 's licenses to illegal immigrants (Kline par. 12). With this bill in effect, illegal immigrants would have the opportunity to vote for an official of the state and country they are living in illegally.