Unethical Business Research Conduct Essay

The firm took the case and went to work. The first hearing ruled that Beatrice Foods wasn’t to be held accountable, just W.R. Grace Company,

Ethics refers to behaviors, practices, and decisions that address three basic and fundamental questions: What is the right thing to do? What is worth doing? What does it mean to be a good behavior analyst (Cooper, 2007)?

The court of appeal noted that while Cook denied the charges against her, she failed to present any evidence that the criminal charges had been terminated in her favour. The court of appeal also noted that the bank merely reported the monetary loss to the police department, which then conducted an independent investigation. The court found that Cook was unable to prove that her employer maliciously reported the alleged theft and therefore upheld the trial court's decision granting the employer's motion for summary judgment.”(Anonymous, 2010).

This case was brought upon by an older lady by the name Stella Liebeck, who purchased a 49 cent cup of coffee at the New Mexico franchise. She purchased it through the drive-thru and while her grand son drove, she opened the lid while the cup was between legs to add sugar and cream. The opening of the lid was that action that caused as serious problem for McDonald's, by doing so she spilled coffee on her lap. Even though coffee is know to be hot this one was a little more than hot, Mrs. Liebeck endured third degree burns form it. Since the coffee was directly on her lap the burns where in highly sensitive areas of her body. Her burns were so sever that the covered six percent of her body, and hospitalized her for eight days. She contacted

This report examines the nature and evaluation of Burger Ranch’s further demands of monetary compensation for their lost profits of six months.. The purpose of this report is to provide you with the necessary legal and statistical information in deciding the most effective course of action with regards to the recovery of lost profits owed to Burger Ranch.

Moreover, Beasley Allen’s representative maintained that the dismissal was a result of Taco Bell’s agreement to make changes in marketing and product disclosure (Dawson, 2011). Rebuttal arguments continuously prevailed through media sources, claiming that the firm should have done its homework prior to pursuing the lawsuit (Dawson, 2011). Overall, in Taco Bell was able to set the record straight about its product.

In the case of Mattel, Inc. vs MGA Entertainment, Inc, the dispute started in 2005 when MGA filled action against Mattel for (1) False Designation of Origin of Affiliation, (2) Unfair Competition, (3) Dilution, and (4) Unjust Enrichment. This case was tried in California’s Central District Court. Ultimately, the judge ruled in-part for and denied in-part against Mattel. The court granted Mattel’s request for the allegations of the Brewer litigation to be dropped and the request for the motion to dismiss MGA’s complaints were denied. The Brewer

Taco Bell's reaction to the "meat filling" charges was speedy and direct. While trying to relieve their employees and consumers, Taco Bell dispatched a promoting campaign clarifying the components in its ground beef. Taco Bell had a pre-appointed crisis management team, and on January 25, 2011, the day the news of the lawsuit broke, they met to discuss the company’s response (Levy, 2011). In conclusion, it is unlikely the allegations made against Taco Bell will cause any harm to their business or harm their brand in any way. The food chain just could not turn a blind eye and ignore the situation after the allegations were exposed to the public and also on social

25 years in previous the actions of McDonald’s coincidently changed the world in relation to how businesses serve hot products. Many questions come to mind in regards to what caused the coffee to spill on Stella Liebeck. In fact, did her grandson driving the motor vehicle speed off or hit bumps, were deep potholes the causing factor of this pivotal moment in this women’s life? Yes, Stella Liebeck did incur severe injuries that were caused by the extremely hot coffee, However, many other issues may have created this to occur. Ethically, McDonald’s knew that their corporate standards of serving coffee between 180-190 degrees when any temperature in excess of 130 degrees were harmful ("Public Citizen Access to Justice, Financial Reform and Government Accountability", n.d.) Additionally, McDonalds received a reported 700 cases of burns occurring from 1982-1992 from their ill practices of serving coffee ("Public Citizen Access to Justice, Financial Reform and Government Accountability", n.d.). Previous to this case I believed that this woman should have been more careful. After reading a great amount of information about the case,

“The State of Texas later fined the company $850,000 "because it allowed adulterated product to enter the market place and cause illness" — however, only $175,000 needed to be paid within the first 30 days, and then Blue Bell would be off the hook for the balance if the it could follow the terms outlined in the agreement for 18 months”

Ultimately, the dilemma was resolved after a Delaware court dismissed the Louisiana Municipal Police Employees’ Retirement System legal claim that the Hershey Co. had engaged in unlawful activity by relying on West African farms that used illegal child labor to harvest cocoa beans (Murdock,

Your honor, I would like to defend my company, TGI Friday’s, in case. The fact that Bernard ate the quesadilla to be a better waiter only establishes the injury occurred during the course of employment. TGI Friday waiters were encouraged to try new items on the menu to help give recommendations to patrons; this was not required. TGI Friday’s sets a high standard on the effectiveness on their recommendations to guests. If an employee has lacking on this, after being evaluated, “counseling” by management is the next step taken to help employees be able to assist and help patrons during their experience at the restaurant. “Secret shoppers” were also guests that assess the waiters’ performance. This is one reason that sampling all new products

The lawsuit is meant to discern liability regarding the "quality issues" Starbucks referenced. MFB claimed some of their products may have been contaminated by a gas leak at one of Starbucks facilitates, while Starbucks faults MFB for unsatisfactory

The survey result shows that most of the people are eating peanut butter. There is only 40% percent of the surveyed people are not eating peanut butter. This proves a greater market to serve for the company.

The decision in the case focuses on a request by a large and powerful franchisee to eliminate the salad bar in a downtown Roy Rogers location. This decision seems