Unethical Conduct : Unprofessional Conduct

Jerry Mason, senior vice president and general manager at Morton-Thiokol, and Morton-Thiokol were on the brink of negotiating the booster’ rocket contract renewal with NASA. Although, it is not an acceptable reason, we could see how engineers and others below the authority of Jerry could be afraid to state something contrary to what he stood by. When someone’s self-interest and pride gets in the way of engineering, it can neglect the welfare of the public, and cause them harm. This case study highlights many irresponsible, and ethical failures in a professional work environment. Jerry Mason failed to abide by the following impediments for responsible action; self-interest, ignorance, and group thinking.

We push to have safe, friendly, and clean working spaces in order for internal duties to be fulfilled and communications to be delivered effectively. It is prohibited to abuse or take advantage of a working space, company computer, or other appliances and facilities for personal gain or recreation. Interactions with fellow team members and management staff are to be professional in nature and not threatening in any way or that prevents Company work from being completed. A positive working environment enables productivity and innovation. Each employee must adhere to the Employee Handbook for added clarity on language and conduct. While in the workplace, negative and threatening language and behavior is not tolerable and is to be reported to the appropriate supervisor(s) and to Human Resources.

For the daily work, our company want to make a relaxed work atmosphere which means employees will not feel too much pressure. For example, we will not make a compartment which is a small space for each employee work. We will try to built a

There are ways Rite Aid could ensure that patients understand the rights and where they could dispute anything, if they feel their information has been used incorrectly. Patients have the right to restrict how their personal information is shared. They could also request how they receive information from Rite Aid concerning their relationship with the company. If the patient wants to avoid any type of mailing from Rite Aid they could do so, and if Rite Aid decides to disobey that right, than they have violated a HIPPA rule. A patient also has the right to access their files, to make sure they are being protected at all times.

The arguments and facts that are used in the article support the proposed solution by stating the problems that arise without having laws in place to protect the privacy rights of patients.

Another very importance aspect is the working environment at the office…it should be a relaxed and informal place where employee, team member should have the time to think and explore new ideas. Mutual trust and respect where disagreement is based on issue rather than personalities in this case conflict become productive to generate new ideas instead of causing problems.

Nevertheless, the decision by the education board’s decision to fire Mrs. Pettit from her teaching career is in my opinion wrong for the following reasons. To begin with, just like anybody else, Mrs. Elizabeth has the freedom to do with her life what she wishes without discrimination, provided she does not endanger the lives of others. Therefore, using her sexual freedom as the grounds to demote her is selective discrimination, which in my opinion is unfair. Secondly, despite her sexual life, Mrs. Elizabeth has an excellent teaching record in her school. According to the school principal, her teaching is satisfactory, and the progress with her classes is good. The primary reason a

Visit at least two different companies’ website and read about how each company explicates the working environment and its expectations of employees. In your discussion post, reference the websites you analyzed. Examples of companies include, Kraft Foods, Apple, CVS Caremark, Johnson & Johnson, and Target. Identify what your selected companies do to establish a positive working environment and committed employees. Be specific in identifying behaviors, programs, or initiatives. (Note: If a company website does not provide enough information, select another company.)

Protecting the public trust is of paramount consideration and a standard of care in the field of dentistry, and of particular interest to policymakers, practitioners, and patients (Jacquot). When some caregivers violate this trust, a proactive holistic approach must be sourced in order to restore patient confidence by authorities and members of the field. As most ethics violations go undetected or unreported (attribution), employing protocols to promote oversight and transparency serve as a deterrent and enable patients to better understand expert recommendations, risks, costs, and options available for treatment. This reassurance of the public trust can help overcome distrust and insecurity deriving from ethics violations by dental practitioners.

Nevertheless, the decision by the education board’s decision to fire Mrs. Pettit from her teaching career is in my opinion wrong for the following reasons. To begin with, just like anybody else, Mrs. Elizabeth has the freedom to do with her life what she wishes without discrimination, provided she does not endanger the lives of others. Therefore, using her sexual freedom as the grounds to demote her is selective discrimination, which in my opinion is unfair. Secondly, despite her sexual life,

Why is it important for leaders to demonstrate ethical conduct? And how did this person do so?

As there is a lot of cases, prosecutor has to conduct, there ought to be some misconduct in some progress. “A Tacoma man convicted of child rape and molestation two years ago did not receive a fair trial because a Pierce County deputy prosecutor committed misconduct during closing arguments, the Washington Court of Appeals has ruled.” Freeing a guilty man because of misconducting is pretty guilty itself, on top of that, the person who misconduct during closing arguments was deputy prosecutor. “The latest reversal came Tuesday, when a three-judge panel from Division II decided Alfred James Thierry Jr. was denied a fair trial because of deputy prosecutor Kara Sanchez improperly inflamed the jury during her closing argument.” “Thierry is entitled to a new trial, the panel said.” Child rape cases is one of the most popular in U.S., or even around the world.

At the BSSL we would like to make work a legal, profitable, and comfortable environment to be at during your careers here with us. We are going to start implementing an open door policy. We want all employees to feel they can speak with any member of management, without risk or fear of loosing their jobs, if they feel uncomfortable about something they are asked to do here. Also, all employees need to keep their eyes and hears opened for illegal and unethical behaviors. If an unethical or illegal behavior is reported and proven we would like to offer the employee that comes forth with the information a reward to show our

Personally, I do not have a feeling that Mrs. Pettits behavior was not immoral although I strongly feel that the behavior was unprofessional. As a teacher, Mrs. Pettits has a right to have a private life but when she goes on and displays that privacy in public eye places her in a risky position that will lead to serious consequences that will accompany her behaviors (Shaw, 2011). In this, it is important to note that in the eyes of the public, sex has been, and will still remain to be considered as a private act that is always shared in the presence of a persons own home. As such, it is very clear that the teacher went ahead and let her sex life to affect her reputation that generally lead to her being punished by the school.

Positive work environment: a culture where junior employees are given fair amount of responsibility and are allowed to challenge themselves is one where employees are more enthused to work and enjoy what they do.