Unified Land Operations Research Paper

Like any other unified team, how does the United States Army gain leverage against our enemies who look to seize the free world? Well like many teams they have offensive operations, which are to seek opportunities to gain leverage against their foes or even gain a win in the end and then they have defensive operations. Defensive operations are the opposite of offensive operations where instead of trying to take advantage of the enemy the Army’s forces are trying to take a stance and push the enemy back. Thus allowing a chance to defend the territory where the soldiers stand and hopefully allow the soldiers to regain their forces. So like many other military forces we have used these tactics for many of years to defend our great nation, but of course over the years are tactics have had to change in order to adapt to different wars. So in this paper you will learn the most current tactics that our Army

The 1986 revision of the US Army, FM 100-5 “AirLand Battle” doctrine introduced the Clausewitzian concept of culmination point as a “key concept of operational doctrine.” Moreover, the new manual adopted the traditional German notion of Auftragstaktik, a decentralized command system with the commander devising a mission and then leaving the methods and means of achieving it to his subordinate

Landpower is defined as the ability to gain, sustain, and exploit control over land, resources, and people. The United States Army is so successful because they insert troops into the conflicting nations and don’t pull them out until they decide that the nation is stable and able to operate on its own. The roles of the Army are prevent, shape, and win. The Army prevents conflict in a nation by having a force that is trustworthy and made up of combat ready forces that can act swiftly when the time comes. The Army also has to stand ready to help defend other nation’s forces if they were to come in conflict at any time. The Army also has to shape the partnering nations by helping to train them so they can defend themselves. The last role is to win, and do so successfully against any opposing force. This can sometimes be the most difficult because it is face to face with the opponents and uses lethal means. The Army mission comes from the congress and laws governing the Armed Forces. The Army is a part of the Armed Forces as well as a profession. Not only does the Army carry out the missions given to them by the Commander in Chief but everyone has a job they have to do in order for the rest of the mission to flow smoothly. The Army relies on trust between soldiers and also the trust between soldiers and their leaders. The mission cannot be completed if there is not trust between everyone working together as a team. Other forms of trust include that between

As mentioned in the beginning, Irregular warfare is complicated in nature, which means we as leaders

Joint operations and the six joint functions allow commanders to integrate military capabilities for the achievement of desired goals. Operation Husky presents an opportunity to assess the joint functions of command and control and the integration of the other joint functions at the operational level. Specifically, this paper evaluates command and control using the three attributes of mission command, and then, integration of some of the joint functions as defined in Joint Publication 1, Doctrine for the Armed Forces of the United States. Operation Husky provides multiple examples of the challenges associated with joint operations and the struggles leaders must deal with to succeed at the strategic and operational levels of war. Command and control establishes the base upon which the remaining joint functions are integrated to achieve unity of effort and mission success. The remaining joint functions provide the military capabilities for battlefield success. Commanders adept at integrating and synchronizing the joint functions in joint operations will achieve unity of effort and mission accomplishment.

The Navy including the Marines must be able to conduct multiple missions simultaneously to overpower the enemy and thwart their forces through joint, collaborated, and swift operations. The application of amphibious doctrine is a complex unified effort requiring a high level of shared knowledge between the various military forces involved (Spiller, 1992).

“Sustained,” in this sense, requires the endurance to continue operations over a long period of time. In addition to long-term operations, the Army operates in the only domain that humans permanently inhabit. Constant interaction with and control over large human populations are therefore key elements in how the Army understands the use and purpose of landpower. Doctrinally, landpower is the ability “to gain, sustain, and exploit control over land, resources, and people.” The Army understands the application of landpower to mean that “winning battles and engagements is important but alone is usually insufficient to produce lasting change in the conditions that spawned conflict.” Success often depends on the “ability to manage populations and civilian authorities.” Due to the Army’s role of deploying rapidly and sustaining operations abroad, combined with the nature of the land domain as the domain in which humans live, the Army views the exercise of landpower as a long-term commitment that involves significant face-to-face contact with enemies and civilians alike. As a result, Army core capabilities emphasize close combat and

The Army provides combatant commanders with trained and ready units, leaders, and individuals. Army expeditionary forces are prepared to conduct unified land operations in support of unified action. The Army accomplishes this by conducting tough, realistic, standards-based, performance-oriented training, which is based on eleven principles of training and seven principles of leader development.

Will the United States Army continue to train, equip, and employ Conventional Airborne Units to conduct Forcible entry operations within the throughout the next decade? The Airborne has deep roots in the Army's doctrine and history but a review of historical data, examination of a matrix of possible future outcomes, event mapping a “What if” scenario and very recent indicators of change suggest that it's only a matter of time until the full reality of impending changes reflect in both the Airborne ranks and in Doctrine and terminate the Airborne mission from the Conventional Airborne Unit.

One afternoon I was only 12 years old when my father told me if I want a pool dig too it myself. I accepted the challenge and began digging. I dug so deep into earth black water begun seeping from the ground. I had no idea what this substance was and I quickly yell for my parents. As I’m rushed out the hole neither of my parents could speak as if they see dead body. 4 months later my parents get into a car accident with a drunk driver and me and brother were left alone with my aunt. The black substances turned out to be oil and my parents left me the rights to sell the oil. And that’s how I made a billion dollars. 9 years later, with the successes of having a billion dollars and partial owner ship to my oil company I vow to promote change for a better city and the lives of people around me. I began my streak of goodwill by purchasing the city of Hollywood in Florida and creating 3 successful hospitals that treats all people not caring for immigration or insurance status. I continued to help most of my family and friends with schools and financial struggles. I also made a piece of The Great Land into a tourist attraction.

Force management plays a key role in the Army's fighting ability and Army Operating Concept as referenced in the article by General Perkins on the Multi-Domain Battle. Force management supports the function of the Army Operating concept by requiring long-range planning of forces and personnel to adapt and keep our advantage of highly trained personnel. As we have seen through the past several years after the sequestration, this portion of the Army Operating Concept is vital and has far-reaching effects. The Army Operating Concept focuses on the next 6-18 years of how the Army will focus and implement full spectrum operations on land (Army War Coll Carlisle Barracks PA, 2011, p. 49). Knowing and refining the required capabilities

The Army’s mission is to build forces capable of Unified Land Operations, able to operate effectively with Joint, interagency, intergovernmental, and multinational partners across the range of military operations to provide capable and ready forces to combatant commanders (CCDRs) in support of the National Security and National Defense Strategies, while sustaining and maintaining the quality of the All-Volunteer Force. (United States, 2014)

At the core of strategy is the process of linking the objectives and outcomes that the Nation hopes to achieve in using military power. The linking is a vital step as to what type of approach to use given its understanding of the conflict. Within the context of OAF and OIF, the United States used two different types of military power, more specifically, brute force was used in OIF and coercive force used in OAF.

One of distinction of airpower mission in which it shows high effectiveness is to prepare the battlefield for future operations that could consist in further action of ground and navy forces in order to obtain the proposed outcome. One of the main requirements for preparing the

Joint doctrine provides an excellent starting point for understanding operational art and its relationship with war and warfare because “Army doctrine exists within a larger set of doctrine publications.” The Army nested its doctrinal concepts with joint doctrine, which “provides the fundamental principles that guide the employment of United States military forces in coordinated action toward a common objective.” In the case of operational art, the US Army uses the joint term, which defines operational art as “the cognitive approach by commanders and staffs…to develop strategies,