Uniform Crime Report

It is unfortunate that crime exists in our daily lives. There really is no way to stopping crime completely, no matter how many laws or punishment are present, people will continue to keep breaking rules. There are many theories of why that may be the case, for example, Caesar Lombroso and his “atavistic” theory with the Positivist School theory and how people were “born criminals”, or the Rational Choice Theory, devised by Cornish and Clarke, described that people could think rationally and how people will naturally avoid pain and seek pleasure referred to as “hedonism” (Cartwright, 2017, lecture 4). Since it is apparent that crime will continue to exist, it is not only important to understand the study of crime and the feedbacks to it,

Uniform Crime Report is a route for police of distinctive locales to look at wrongdoing inside of their group. It began in 1931 by the FBI. The way that it has been around for so long despite everything it being utilized as top efficient date authority in law implementation demonstrates its significance. Not all casualties report the criminal acts so it may not be as precise but rather it is solid. The National Opinion Research Center was the first national casualty overview. Questioners contemplated family units in a twelve-month period to see what occurrences they have experienced. It was made in 1967 by Ennis. The UCR delineated like fifty percent of what the family units were included in. exploitation overviews are exceptionally useful to the law implementation organization. I don't comprehend what other approach to track wrongdoing in the point of view of a casualty. The issue is that a great many people who are casualties won't report the wrongdoing in which they were exploited.

“Surprise, AZ (November 1, 2012) The City of Surprise had the second-lowest rate of property crime and violent crime in 2011 among the largest cities in Maricopa County, based on the city’s analysis of the latest FBI statistics” (Arthur, n.d.). Could social economic play a role in Surprise, Arizona’s low violent and property crime rate? Or could it be sufficient guardians set in place formal (police, security guards, etc.) and/or informal (neighbor, friends and others, etc.)? “According to the FBI’s Uniform Crime Report for 2011 as analyzed the Surprise Police Department, Surprise recorded 1.09 violent crimes and 21.79 property crimes per 1,000 residents last year” (Arthur, n.d.).

While violent crime is declining overall, hate crimes are on the rise. Which resource is better to use- the Federal Bureau of Investigation or the Bureau of Justice statistics?

Crime is not an easy concept to define and is very problematic. The two proposed definitions offered by Dr. Hutchinson of crime is behavior that violates laws and behavior that violates morality. These two definitions often do not correspond with each other. In the case of behaviors that violate morality, there is not a plaintiff. Examples of behavior that violates morality are white collar crime and prostitution. These crimes usually do not involve victims of any kind but are just simply illegal due to norms and morals of society. Society is also morally opposed to them or does not like the kinds of people who are committing these acts. Law violating crimes usually involve a victim. Usually, this victim brings charges against the accused and

Many citizens believe that there is more and more crime occurring in the United States each year. However, evidence suggests that, for the most part, the United States’ crime rate is decreasing while the rest of the world’s crime rates are increasing. The rate of both violent crimes and property crimes have significantly decreased in the past two decades. In 2014, there were 9.4 million crimes reported, which is a drastic improvement from the 13.8 million crimes that were reported in 1995. Even though these are only statistics for the number of crimes that were reported to the authorities, the trends of victimization also support the idea the crime rates are declining.

There are two programs that measure the magnitude, nature, and impact of crime in the nation. One of them is the Uniform Crime Reporting Program (UCR). The UCR was originally started with only reporting seven major offenses. Which were: murder, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny (theft) and motor vehicle theft. Later on it mandated for an arson to be added therefore making it the eight we have now. The UCR program uses data collected from law enforcement received every month to come up with its report. Along with the numbers for trends and counts for crime. The report has much more information as well. Such as who was arrested, their age, gender, and race.

The Uniform Crime Reporting Program (UCR) is a nationwide, involving systems with thousands of statistical information by city, county, and state law enforcement agencies voluntarily reporting data on crimes brought to their attention. Not only is this program supported by local law enforcement agencies, but also by Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation. Its primary objective is to generate a reliable set of criminal statistics for use in law enforcement administration, operation, and management. It gathers and draws its information from a category of crime index and rate of crime. These include the violent crimes of "murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault, and the property crimes

From a business perspective, and when dealing with the more violent crimes, the Uniform Crime Report would be more accurate. Crimes such as murder or a kidnapped child are crimes that can usually be counted on to be reported. The only down fall is that the UCR only reports crimes that are reported to the police. Crimes that are frequently not reported to the police can include, but are not limited to sexual assualt and household theft. In the business stand point, we can only assume how many rapes actually occur in the United States. Even with this downfall, I feel that the UCR is more accurate than using surveys due to the fact that we are not relying souly on whether or not a victim is being honest or that the survey will be filled out at

Chapter 2 allows readers to visualize and understand the concept of the most severe crimes to the least serious crimes. The chapter introduces the Uniform Crime Reports and the issues within the reports. Part one crimes include two subcategories: crimes against the person and crimes against property. Part two crimes are considered everything else that part one and two did not include. Historical trends made a difference and shift the crime rate of the Uniform Crime Reports. Furthermore, part one crimes discussed the different degrees and differences. Crimes are classified by the severity between a state’s guidelines and the Uniform Crime Reports ‘guidelines. For instance, the Uniform Crime Reports’ guidelines can consider an aggravated battery

Error can occur daily with the public safety or criminal justice organization, especially the ones that have to be manually input into a system like the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR). The errors are not done purposely, but humans are in charge of inputting the data it is possible to make errors which tend to show up as gaps within the reporting systems. An error can happen when officers record the actualities of an incident correctly, but misclassify the type of crime (Nolan et al. 2006). Hypothetically, categorization of errors can happen for various reasons. For example, simple mistakes made by law enforcement officers (LEOs), bad writing habits that were passed down from police officer to police officer,

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) defines murder, or homicide, as “the willful act of one individual human killing another” (FBI). These acts exclude particular acts of causing death including accidents, death from negligence, and justifiable homicide as they fall under other classifications. Justifiable homicide includes death resulting from a citizen acting upon another during the course of committing a felony, or a peace officer acting while in the line of duty. As an organization, the FBI produces these reports utilizing a program titled uniform crime reporting (UCR) to collect data on the details of each individual case. Information gathered through UCR specifies the demographics of the suspect(s) and victim(s) involved in the altercation, how the act was performed, relationships of the parties involved, and other outstanding circumstances. When reporting information, law agencies are preferred to include these aspects of homicide data but not strictly required to do so.

The Uniform Crime Reporting Program (UCR) defines motor vehicle theft as “the theft or attempted theft of a motor vehicle.” Motor vehicles are defined as a self-propelled vehicle that travels on the ground, but not on a rail and excludes aircraft, boats, and farm/heavy equipment. All law enforcement agencies in Texas must submit UCR data to DPS for a multitude of crimes, including auto theft and burglary. In turn, UCR data is used by ABTPA during the grant evaluation and grant award process.

There has always been a fascination with trying to determine what causes an individual to become a criminal? Of course a large part of that fascination has to do with the want to reduce crime, and to determine if there is a way to detect and prevent individuals from committing crime. Determining what causes criminality is still not perfectly clear and likewise, there is still debate as to whether crime is caused biologically, environmentally, or socially. Furthermore, the debate is directly correlated to the notion of 'nurture vs nature'. Over time many researchers have presented various theories pertaining to what causes criminal behavior. There are many theories that either support or oppose the concept of crime being biological rather

Physical assault and aggression is the second leading cause of death among 14 to 17 year olds, next to vehicular accidents (Loeber). But why are humans so aggressive in the first place? There are two sides of the debate: Nature, and Nurture. Some say that it’s human nature, genetics that cause most behaviors, while others say that we act as we learned during childhood. This argument applies to aggression as well. Aggression is mainly caused by things during childhood and adolescence where people learn from various sources about aggression, although, human psychology plays a slight factor.