Unilateral Contract Law: Cenco Inc.

Deep Topics and others file a suit against CCS, alleging infringement of the plaintiffs’ intellectual property rights. Which type of intellectual property is involved in this situation? What is CCS’s likely defense? How is a court most likely to rule? Explain. 7) On May 1, Brand Name Industries, Inc. (BNI), sent Carol a letter, via overnight delivery, offering to employ her to audit BNI’s financial statements for the current year for $10,000. In the letter, BNI stated that Carol had ten days to accept. On May 5, Carol sent BNI a fax that stated, “The price for the audit seems too low. Would you consider paying $12,000?” BNI received the fax. The next day, Dan offered to conduct the audit for $8,000. On learning of Dan’s offer, Carol immediately emailed BNI, agreeing to do the work for $10,000. BNI received this e-mail on May 7. Explain why BNI and Carol do, or do not, have a contract.

On October 29th, 2015, I made the trip to small claims court at the Superior Court North County Division in Vista, California. The case I observed was a contract dispute between Michael Mendell and Ediga Narashima. The plaintiff (Mendell) was sueing the defendant (Narashima) for $4,000 over a breach of contract. Narashima had given Mendell the opportunity to build theatre system and a bookshelf for his home. They both came to an agreement that the total cost of this procedure would be $4,100. Mr. Mendell is a professor at APT College where he teaches telecommunications. Mendell claims that the full $4,100 was never paid to him. During the whole process of the build there was many setbacks and problems that arose. Mendell claimed that while he was working on this home theatre project, he missed out on work and money he could have obtained from his other job as a professor. That is the reason why he is sueing Narashima as well as the fact that Mendell claims Narashima did not pay him his final installment of $300 for the job. Ediga Narashima claims that the final installment was paid through a friend or third party named Mario Diaz. Mario was a friend of both the plaintiff and defendant. He had referred Mendell to Narashima for the job. Mendell counterclaims that he had never received the final installment from Mario. The big question is to whether Mario had payed the final installment to Mendell as they agreed in

-The Issue: were all the elements of a contract present to make the contract enforceable?

10. Dan hires Eve to perform at Dan 's Club, but Eve later breaches the agreement to accept a higher-paying job at First Star Arena. Dan files a suit gainst Eve. The court will most likley: award damages to Dan.

Cir. 504 (Cir. Ct. 2009) the plaintiff filed suit against defendants claiming that the contract for the construction and sale of a home that was at issue was invalid, worthless, and unenforceable. Furthermore, the plaintiff also alleged that he was entitled to withdrawal and termination of the same contract. Defendants filed a counterclaim for specific performance of the contract of the sale.

The validity of an oral contract depends on the jurisdiction, in most cases they are treated like any written one, but some situations (such as when exchanging real property) may require physical evidence such as a written agreement to back up the oral one. For oral contracts to hold water (become enforceable) they must be done correctly, like making sure there is a witness to the deal-making.

Gregory, a comedy writer, entered into a contract with Wessel, a comedian. The contract provided that Gregory would provide Wessel with a 15 minute monologue for his upcoming appearance on the comedy Hour and that Wessel would pay Gregory $250. All Performers on the comedy Hour make $500 per appearance. As Gregory knows, the last time Wessel appeared on the Comedy Hour he was asked to make special guest appearances at three local comedy clubs using the same monologue. Wessel earned a total of $750 for the three performances. Shortly before Wessel was scheduled to appear on the comedy Hour, Gregory informed Wessel that he was unable to provide the monologue. As a result, Wessel was forced to cancel his appearance. Wessel sued for breach of contract and requested damages of $1,250. What will result? Issue, -

The principle of law is that for a valid contract to be formed there must be an agreement reached by both parties.

case brief---Gregory, a comedy writer, entered into a contract with Wessel, a comedian. The contract provided that Gregory would provide Wessel with a 15 minute monologue for his upcoming appearance on the comedy hour and Wessel will pay $250 to Gregory. All performers could make $500 per appearance on the comedy hour. and when Wessel was scheduled to aper on the comedy hour, Gregory informed him that he was unable to provide the monologue, because last time Wessel was asked to make special guest appearances at three local comedy clubs performance during the comedy hour. and Wessel bought lawsuit to Gregory for beach of contract and request damages of $1250.

For the reasons set forth below, I submit that we could plausibly argue that a condition precedent to Proterra’s duty to pay has not been satisfied, the interest provision of the contract is an improper liquidated damages clause, and the interest provision of the contract is unconscionable.

The plaintiff in the case is Vassilkovska and the defendant is Woodfield. Nadejda Vassilkovska bought a used car from Woodfield Nissan. In a separate agreement other than the contract, Nadejda Vassilkovska promised to arbitrate claims against Woodfield instead of suing in court. Woodfield promised to arbitrate claims against Vassilkovska as well. However, Woodfields agreement contained complete exemption for issues that could arise from the sales of the automobile. Vassilkovska sued Woodfield for misrepresenting the price of the car in a financing agreement.

The prior medical practice agreed the noncompete clause could be waived and bought-out in exchange for a payment of $195,000.00. In December 2010, Dr. Stout desired to become an employee of the Practice. Dr. Stout believed the noncompete clause would “curtail[]” his “employability” with the Practice. Therefore, Dr. Stout obtained a loan from the Practice to buy-out the noncompete clause. Dr. Stout signed both a written agreement and a promissory note in which he agreed to repay the loan to the Practice. Thereafter the Practice caused $195,000.00 to be paid to Dr. Stout’s prior medical practice on

In the second case, Pete can sue Coco if he refuses to pay extra 拢800 he promised. Pete can sue Coco for promissory estoppel. Pete can tell the court that he relied on coco’s promise and hired a new employee and now he had to pay him the money from his own salary. Pete can also give the reason that the new employee that he hired was for the benefit of Coco as Pete wanted to finish his task before deadline. Pete’s not completion of task could land coco into trouble as he had to delay the opening of his

4. Voidable Contract. According to Section 2 (i), "An Agreement which is enforceable by law at the option of one or more parties but not at the option of the other or others is a voidable contracts." Note that the word used here is 'contract' and not just 'agreement'. Thus is the result of absence of free consent in the contract. This is so because the rights and duties are created and the was not free but was obtained by coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation. The other party who include the consent take advantage of his own fraud because "He who comes into Equity (i.e. before law) must come with clean hands. “Thus a voidable contract valid and enforceable until the party repudiates it entitled to avoid

Contracts can be defined through promises between parties that are enforceable through law. We know that both parties agreed verbally, an oral agreement was made to hold the car for one day with a hundred-dollar deposit and Stan agreed to the terms that the deposit was refundable. Contracts can be in in two form which are written or oral. Based on the elements of contracts, many fundamentals factors are considered mandatory to form a contract that is binding on parties and are primarily outlined through the following: