Unit 513 Manage health and social care practice to ensure positive outcomes for individuals

The evaluation designs for generalist practice are broken down into five parts that is discussed in this chapter. These techniques are helpful when working with client systems. The first one is the single-subject design. This design determines whether or not an intervention is successful. (Kirst-Ashman & Hull, 2015) It focuses on families, a group or a large system. Next is the goal-attainment scaling, it is a method used when achievement of the goal is sufficiently important to be used as the primary outcome criterion. (Kirst-Ashman & Hull, 2015) Next is the task-achievement scaling, it is a method of evaluating the degree to which an identified set of tasks has been accomplished. (Kirst-Ashman & Hull, 2015) Next is the client satisfaction

As we all know people may loose the ability to brush their teeth due to various causes. A simple task has been taken grounded by most people everyday, but is a mission impossible for someone. Besides to be able to live normally for someone, they have to feel safe to be where they are. No one can carry on living in fear. By adapting outcome based practice will need care providers to using special means to support individual to achieve these tasks rather than do the task for them for the reason of individual wishing to carry on those tasks

The government instigated the change, technology designed an application to manage and control the data, now it’s left to the healthcare industry to configure a business strategy for using data analytics to improve the outcomes related to the patient, secure population data and the improve the business of healthcare performance. What do all three have in common – survival?

In outcomes tracking and goal setting the program evaluates client progress and program effectiveness, why tracking the progress toward goals using historical data recorded at different times points (Client Track , 2013).

Outcome based practice, is defined by the Scottish Government as “an outcomes-based approach encourages us all to focus on the differences that we make and not just the input or processes over which we have control” (Scottish Government 2011). In 2011, the English Government launched is first framework of outcomes for adult health and social care. Within this framework, they stated “set of outcomes measures which have been agreed to be of value, both nationally and locally for demonstrating the achievements of adult social care”.

There are a number of practice theories that can be applied at my practicum at Berkshire Care Centre but the top four I found to be the most significant is strength based, solution focused, cultural and spiritual perspectives. For strength based perspective, there is a strong emphasis put on finding and focusing on resident’s personal strengths and their self-determination. The reason for focusing on strengths is to help facilitate with developing and accomplishing their goals and tasks. Another practice theory that was applied throughout my placement is solution focused perspective. I find this theory to be helpful for residents especially those who fixate on problems since it encourages them to move away from focusing on the problem. This

The following briefing outlines key concepts, assets and milestones in building a comprehensive approach to increasing quality of implementation through decreasing unnecessary variability and complexity. The goals of the initial discovery phase include:

Outcomes identification provides direction for continuous care and modified on the basis of changes in patient characteristics or evaluation, and documented as measurable goals (Bell, et.al, 2008).

• To put patients at the heart of care I implemented, with service users engagement a specifically designed innovative CPA questionnaire. Patients’ feedback reflects better satisfaction and empowerment to take a lead in their meetings, a cultural change as highlighted by one of 13 patients surveyed, “Makes me feel that I've input into decision-making in the meeting… It is logical, practical and informative… ". Clinicians felt enabled to offer a more bespoke management and get a clearer picture of patients health and social needs. This project, already taken up by other community teams was highly commended at the Trust Board meeting and Health Education NW Leadership conference in April '17.

I used the MOHO approach and Rehabilitative frame of reference to guide my patient’s evaluation. MOHO approach was used because we were looking at her holistically. Treatment goals were client-centered. We considered her habits, roles, and values when we were discussing goals for her evaluation. The rehabilitative frame of reference was used because her goals and treatment plan were focused on ADLs and IADLs. The patient has plans to return home and needs to be independent in ADLs and be able to do her household chores.

new outcomes. This also would condition a client to manage and learn new skills to cope with their

Program developers are able to assess or program outcome against objectives and aims. (SAMHSA, 2006). Objectives provide the direction for measuring different aspects of health care improvement. Thus, evaluators determine accuracy when they satisfy objectives and goals previously set. The application of a process of intervention can provide evidentiary material to determine the success of a program in improving a specific health outcome. The developers of the intervention have the responsibility of ensuring standardization and the strategies management of information. It is these factors that serve as determiners

When it comes to performance management, at the present time the company does an exceptional job of monitoring and measuring what is expected of an employee. However, providing the necessary consequences for performance expectations is lacking. I say this because, each fiscal year I receive a year end review, year after year my manager and I sit down and discuss the past year. He goes over all the strengths and weaknesses of my performance, line by line. Once he finishes he

To assess whether the cardiac ready communities are efficient as systems, it is essential to identify whether the program outcomes are aligned to overall project goals.

Process indicators measure program implementation and are useful in decision making on whether to make modification on the design and delivery of the interventions. They form a basis for verification on whether the program is being implemented as planned or not(30). It will be expected to ensure that LLINs have been procured and are available for distribution, health workers have been selected and ready for the trainings, and stakeholders are available and are ready for the planned meetings.