Racial profiling occurs every day. It is a longstanding and deeply troubling national problem despite the claims that the United States has entered a “post-racial era.” “Racial profiling is patently illegal, violating the U.S. Constitution’s core promises of equal protection under the law to all and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. Racial profiling affects a wide array of communities of color. More than 240 years of slavery and 90 years of legalized racial segregation have led to systemic profiling of blacks in traffic and pedestrian stops. Since September 11, 2001, members of Muslim, Arab, and South Asian communities have been profiled by airline personnel, federal law enforcement, and local police.” (Racial Profiling, n.d.)
There are tons of cases of Racial Profiling. Now a days many people are being targeted or attacked by racial profiling. Laws are being passed but not every police officer is following up with it. And because of this more and more people are becoming irritated with the government system. Just because a particular person from a particular race does something wrong, everyone from that race is being discriminated by so-called other races. Racial profiling is getting worst by the years go by, it is becoming a hot topic. Ever since the major attack of September 11, 2001 many people have seen Muslims as terrorists. Racial profiling doesn’t just affect Muslims; it affects African Americans and Hispanics. Due to the action of just one individual, and from that individual affects the whole race behind it. It just doesn’t make that person look bad it makes they’re race look as bad as they do. That is why African American, Hispanics, and Muslims are being targeted. Racial profiling negatively impacts society.
Even the United States struggles with issues of racial discrimination despite being a society highly based on immigrants and multicultural diversity. On one hand, people frown on treatment based on race, whether that is on an individual or group level. On the other, people are tired and annoyed by the seemingly constant call of discrimination. All of these feelings culminate into the debate pertaining to the use of racial profiling. Likewise, there are some individuals that hold a certain level of acceptance in regard to racial profiling. However, what is lost in the process because of that acceptance? There are many components that need to be thought about in reference to the use of racial profiling. In addition, it can be viewed
Islam is a very unique religion. Its most closely related to Muslim people mostly living in the Middle East such as Qatar, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Lebanon. And some people live in central Asia such as Pakistan and Afghanistan. However for a lot of people, especially in the United States, these days they identify Muslims as terrorism ever since the 9/11 attacks. Even though things are more under control, there was and still is with Americans having trouble identifying whether Muslims are danger in society or are there the same people just like Americans are. When 9/11 happened, people think that a lot of Muslims seems to embrace the radical perspective from the tourist organization Al-Queda. In stories from Asra Q.Nomani and Sahar Aziz, they explained discussing the same issue but different and interesting perspectives on racial profiling affecting on the Muslim people. In “Airport Security: Let’s Profile Muslims” by Asra Q.Nomani from The Daily Beast, she explains that a lot of the U.S. targeting international and domestic criminals have come from the Muslim faith. Furthermore, Nomani further stated that profiling must be discussed as experts beginning to catch up with radical Islamic ideology which forces people committing heinous crimes for themselves or terrorist organization such as blowing up an airplane. Moreover, Nomani states how profiling can help to identify with people associating with a terrorist organization which keeps airplanes safe in the skies. “Racial
Racial profiling is targeting individuals based upon their particular characteristics (“What is Racial,” 2015). “Before September 11th, polls showed that Americans of all races and ethnicities believed racial profiling to be both widespread and unacceptable” (“Reports and Curricula,” 2015). However, after the September 11th terrorists’ attacks on the World Trade Centers and the Pentagon, this was no longer the case. Individuals as well as the federal government started to racially profile Arab Americans, Arabs, and Muslims (“Reports and Curricula,” 2015).
Ever since the terrorist attacks of September 11 there have been an increase in the willingness to condone law enforcement and security actions based primarily on the color of ones’ skin. Since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, it has been the official policy of the United States government to stop, interrogate, and detain individuals without criminal charges on the basis of their national origin, ethnicity and religion. Thus, the term racial profiling was coined. Society, however, has been ignorant to the true meaning of racial profiling and has sometimes misinterpreted the government’s continuous
One of the activities of counterterrorism that the United States have done is the NYPD made an informant called “secret spying program” to infiltrate and monitor Muslim life in and around New York City (Gonzalez 2017). Here is where the social factor “stereotypes” contributes to racial profiling, because since the attack of 9/11 was operated by Arabs and Muslims, innocent individuals who are also Arabs or Muslims will be given the ascribed status as danger. The fact that Arabs and Muslims are being followed around constantly is violating their personal life. It is read here “June 2012, a group of Muslims and organizations who had been targeted for NYPD surveillance filed suit against the city in federal court, alleging violations of their rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution” (2017). It is shown here, that Arabs and Muslims are being stalked by the New York Police Department and are not given privacy to these citizens. The meaning of this is because the United States does not trust the Arabs and Muslims roaming New York City. It is because of the event of 9/11 Arabs and Muslims are given the stereotype that they are terrorists and given they status they are nothing but a threat and danger to the United States. Also the fact that the United States are violating their individual rights is unacceptable.
Over the centuries in which the nation has existed, the “melting pot”, as one could call it, has faced its share of economic and political scandals. Racial profiling is one of its more serious forms of scandal due to the implications of its existence. The act of criminally categorizing human subgroups is both barbaric and illogical. Racial profiling is defined as the practice of targeting individuals for police or security interaction, detention ,or other disparate treatment based on race in belief that certain minority groups are more likely to engage in unlawful behavior. It has become a sort of base for current society’s law enforcement system, but it is a futile practice that should not be in use. The act of racial profiling should not
September 11, 2001, was a very tragic day for many people living in the United States. Millions of people were affected by the terrorist attacks. Since then airport security has changed as well as police techniques. When police are at work they use many techniques to decrease their suspect pools. Racial profiling is the most common technique used. The dictionary definition for racial profiling is “the use of race or ethnicity as grounds for suspecting someone of having committed an offense.” This is the most controversial technique that our government uses today. Minorities are the most affected, being mistaken for a criminal because a person “fits the profile”, a common scenario in the United States. The issue with racial profiling is
As we try to answer the proposed question we will look at racial profiling from both sides. A country must take certain measures to ensure the safety of its people. Some argue that in order to protect citizens from acts of terrorism, various individual freedoms must be sacrificed. Others feel that if we as a nation volunteer to relinquish our freedoms, the federal government will proceed to shred additional individual rights.
Security measures drastically increased after 9/11. 9/11 was an act of terrorism that would change the way the country handled privacy. Americans needed to voice their opinions after this happened and have their own rights protected. The need to protect individual rights is the utmost important aspect in a thriving U.S. society.
Since the attacks of 9/11, Muslim communities have been “targeted” by methods such as racial profiling, according to the Toronto Star (1). In America, the FBI have detained over 400 Muslim-Americans to bring them in for questioning. Although the claims of Attorney General John Ashcroft and FBI Director Robert Mueller say that these detainments have nothing to do with religion and ethnic background, many say this is, in fact, racial profiling. Some believe that it is appropriate, some believe it is not appropriate. How is it not appropriate? It is not appropriate because, one, it is a form of discrimination, if directed at one culture; two, not all people of Arabic descent agree with the beliefs of the common Islamic terrorist; and three, by
Of course, racial profiling is a heavily disputed concept for a number of reasons, largely because the persons of that specified race are immediately put at a disadvantage. For example, “Membership in a particular ethnic or religious group is a valid marker for assuming and judging unobserved behavioral traits in another person, especially when we have no other information to go on at that moment in time” (Horowitz 2). Some people believe that it is a necessary precaution to racially profile citizens. According to Carl Horowitz, racial profiling is simply a way to ensure that threats such as terrorism are prevented. Actions such as inspecting Muslim citizens through their daily lives and
The immediacy and the primacy of any truly potent force is the ability to perpetuate itself. Sharp and energetic outbursts have their place, and can be known to have great effect-cataclysmic forces, despite their maximum destructive potential, are temporary in their total effects in relation to some absolute goal. In other words, they are generally limited in scope, and well defined in purpose; there is a tactical objective, which is usually consummated quickly. The more dreaded force creeps along, escalating incrementally, and while it may abide a strategic goal, or even a policy, it is generally open-ended. This sort of ambiguity I am referring to differs from the flexible tactical necessity in that strategic outcomes are very much