Essay on Unit LD 205 Principles Of Positive Risk

Describe how a human rights based approach supports an individual to make decisions and take risks

It is essential to manage risks associated with conflicts or dilemmas between an individual’s rights and duty of care by finding a level of balance. It is important that the care giver put personal feelings aside and look objectively at the situation. The right action should always be taken even if emotionally this is hard to do.

This assignment is intended to provide evidence of a candidate’s knowledge and understanding of the principles for duty of care in health, social care or children and young people’s settings. By completing all tasks within the assignment, the candidate will provide evidence that meets the Learning Outcomes and assessment criteria for Unit 054, Principles for Implementing Duty of Care in Health, Social Care or Children and Young People’s Settings.

A Health and social care organisations have what is called a duty of care towards the pople in there care. That means that they must do everything within there power to keep the pople in their care safe from harm. It is not only the care establishment that needs to prioritise the safety , welfare and interests of the people it cares for, but also the care workers themselves who work at the care organisations. The employer also has a duty of care towards its members of staff, to ensure that working conditions are safe and suitable to deliver the services that they provide

Duty of care affect people you support ,their family, the people you work with and your employer. There is a requirement for all of us in society to take reasonable care to avoid injures to others because of our thoughtless acts. We also have a more specific legal duty of care as a social care employee. Set out in a number of laws such: Health and Safety Act

People with disabilities are specifically vulnerable to physical, sexual and emotional abuse and may require additional protection.

(Slide 1) "Good afternoon to all staff and welcome to this month's Workplace Health and Safety information session. Today's presentation is going to cover off on the concept of 'Duty Of Care' and how it relates to the organisation, and indeed all of us in a Workplace Health and Safety capacity. (Slide 2) For your reference, I will be referring to the Work Health & Safety Act 2011 throughout. I will ensure a copy of this document is placed on the WellCare intranet along with a recording of this presentation. (Slide 3) Duty of Care; as a concept: The Oxford Dictionary defines 'Duty of Care' as 'a moral or legal obligation to ensure the safety or well being of others'1.

The statutory reforms appear to have altered the duty of care to only impose an obligation to use reasonable care and not a duty to prevent harm. Notwithstanding, even when risk is foreseeable and not insignificant there is no breach unless there is a failure to act as a reasonable person. It appears the statutory reforms have endorsed the shift away from the required standard of care of risk being deemed as foreseeable unless far-fetched or fanciful to that of failing to take precautions.

Chapter nine of Reading In Risk examines the risks involved with the amelioration of other risks. Although we are in the safest time period in history as a culture we seem preoccupied with risks and their reduction. Though on the surface this seems like a good thing how do we decide what risks to concentrate on, not all of them will happen. A further consideration to account for is that by using resources we deplete future resources to deal with the shocks that were caused by risks we did not address or novel ones that arose because we displaced the risk instead of reducing the net risk. This is problematic for government agencies because they often disagree on important risk reduction strategies since they are focused on various risks and

Disabled people developed the social model of disability because the traditional medical model did not explain their personal experience of disability or help to develop more inclusive ways of living” (Scope). The social model of disability challenges them to look at disability differently and be treated differently. It is important to say that people must make sure that lifts, ramps and signs are put in place to help people with impairments. “Barriers are not just physical. Attitudes found in society based on prejudice or stereotype, or disablism, also disable people from having equal opportunities to be part of society” (Scope). The social model of disability helps people with impairments to become prouder of who they

Even in the 21st century, she suggests that society negatively views disabilities when disabled people consider their lives to be a complete, joyous experience. Before undergoing testing or screening, the patient has to undergo an informed consent process; Ouellette urges the importance of changing this process. She writes:

It is a legal obligation of healthcare professional to take reasonable care of a patient against the risk of harm that is reasonably foreseeable. In simple terms it is understood that risk in inevitable and a measure of careful behaviour is reasonableness as risk cannot be eliminated completely (Kim Forrester & ‎Debra Griffiths, 2014). This is based on the “neighbour principle” formulated by Lord Atkin. In healthcare, the term “neighbour” is representative of a person who comes under the care of the healthcare professional and whose act directly affects the person (Norman Katter,

According to the 2000 U.S. Census, nearly fifty million individuals, one in every five people ages five and older in the United States are living with potentially disabling conditions (United States Census Bureau website, 2012). Because so many Americans are living with a disability, the Americans with Disability Act, enacted in 1990, was a landmark act that reduced many barriers for people with disabilities (Thompson, 2015). However, more needs of the disabled population are being identified. Consequently, more regulatory policy formulation needs to be done to improve the health of people with disabilities and their families (Mason, Gardner, Outlaw, & O’Grady, 2016).

A duty of care is a legal obligation to provide reasonable care while performing any task or building any omissions that could foreseeably harm others. The existence of a duty of care for personal injury was originally taken from the neighbor test Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562. It is clear from the case that manufacturer owed their duty of care. This test must be carried to determine the existence of duty of care and the foreseeability which relies on the relationship between

Individual rights are often viewed as inherent rights, but as our society makes ameliorations concerning individual rights, these collections of rights become more likely to encounter opposition. Often, it is generally held that our responsibility to others’ rights is simply to ensure we allow our own expected rights to be the same for our fellow citizens. However, this is not sufficient; mainly because what we expect as our own personal rights often contrast with others’ particular beliefs, and subsequently their rights. Often these difference occur because of religious, political, social, and cultural differences. There are continual claims to rights, and often many of these promulgations of rights are seemingly self-serving (Lloyd). However, without these individual rights, not only would freedom be lost, but also would cultural diversity. Furthermore, social responsibilities ensure the conservation of public health, the safeguard of public safety, among many others. For these reasons, individual and social responsibility must be employed. There must exist the ability and flexibility to protect on an individual level, and a societal level.