United States V. Texas Case Analysis

What started the argument of this case was ‘what standard should be used to evaluate the sufficient amount of probable cause and if the word of an informant be reliable. Thanks to this case we now have a two prong rule that needs to be met before a magistrate can sign a search warrant.

Amending the Texas Constituion rules are set by Article 17 of the Texas Constitution. You begin with the proposal for amendment of the Texas Constitution. It takes a two thirds vote of the full committee of both houses of the legislature. To constitute a two-thirds majority vote, one hundred members of the house and twenty-one senators must vote for the proposal to amend the constitution. Individual legislators’ votes must be publicly recorded. The legislature gets to choose the date for the ratification election. The Secretary of State will then draft a brief statement of each proposed amendment. Which then has to be approved by the Attorney General. A statement of these changes must be widely published before

The highest court in all of America is the Supreme Court. They decide and uphold

The Police of Harris County was informed of a weapons disturbance in a private residency. The officers found two individuals of the same sex engaging in sexual, (sodomy), behavior. However, the way the police officers enter the premises, was not at all questioned.

Rationale: The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas rejected Hill’s dispute that the ordinance was unconstitutionally vague or overbroad. The court stated that it was not vague because, “the working of the ordinance is sufficiently definite to put a person of reasonable intelligence on fair notice of what actions are forbidden.” This court felt that the words used in defining the ordinance, such as, ‘interrupt,’ is adequately clear, understandable, and a very common, routine word.

Sarah Dessen used to say that “Accepting all the good and bad about someone is a great thing to aspire to. The hard part is actually doing it.” Barbara Jordan, who was the leader of Civil Right Movement, said “We, as human beings, must be willing to accept people who are different from ourselves.” Both quotations mean that when people faced conflicts or had differences with the other people, they should be willing to understand the others’ point of view rather than just ignore or refute those. It is true that a lot of people agree to those quotations; however, not all the people agree with these ideas. For instance, although ‘Texas vs. Johnson Majority Opinion’ and ‘Jim Wright’s letter’ embrace the central idea of the quotations, ‘Tomi Lahren

On Monday April 18, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the Texas v United States case. “Conservative justices questioned Obama’s authority to use executive actions to shield some 4 million undocumented immigrants from deportation.” (de Vogue). It was noted that there are currently 11.3 million immigrants that are undocumented, and Congress had only provided the funds to remove about 4 million. During the hearing Justice Anthony Kennedy said, “It’s as if -- that the President is setting the policy and Congress is executing it. That’s just upside down.” (de Vogue). The case resulted in a tie 4-4 with all Democrats voting in favor of the programs, and all the Republicans voting against them. As a result of a tie, the Supreme Court looks to the previous hearing results, which was that the programs will remain blocked.

The Supreme Court decides which cases which cases to hear and which cases not to hear in numerous amounts of ways. First and Foremost, the Supreme Court has to go through around 10,000 petitions, however only 80 are actually heard. One thing the Supreme Court is willing to hear is a case regarding a conflict of law. This means the Supreme Court will step in when a number of other courts do not agree on the conclusion so that the law can begin.

The Essential Question surrounding this case is, “May school administrators search a student or their belongings absent of probable cause?”

The Court of Appeals was established by Congress to relieve some of the caseload of the Supreme Court. There are 12 regional circuit courts, and one for the “Federal Circuit,”. The Supreme Court of the United States in Washington, D.C. is the highest court in the nation. The United States political system dictates that both the federal government and each of the 50 states

The immigration case talks about the illegal immigrants entering the country. Texas disagreeing with the government the decision about immigration. Sixty-five other states agree with Texas and are defying the U.S. The US government has power over relations with other countries and who comes into or leaves the borders. Although the borders are not tightly guarded, so the government doesn't know exactly who is coming and leaving the US. That how immigrants come into the country and stay in the shadows, eleven million immigrants hiding in the US. They are struggling to make a decision on what to do about them. Senate has passed a rough bill but it was turned down by the house of representatives multiple times. The executive branch new programs

The Supreme Court rules on many major issues of our society today. It is the highest federal court in the U.S. It has 9 justices, the chief justice and the associate judges. They choose which cases they would like to hear by a rule of 4. Some cases may begin in lower courts, while cases where they have original jurisdiction will begin in Supreme Court. The cases they hear usually involve federal questions or questions about the Constitution. There are many major issues today. Many people wonder how the Supreme Court will consider these issues in the next ten years.

How do the justices decide to hear a case or not? Not just any case can be heard by the supreme court so what makes the cases the supreme court does hear special? The cases that the supreme court hears are ones that deal with issues with the federal law. or if they fall within the limits of the federal government the supreme court might decide to hear them. If a case only has to do with county or state laws than this case will most likely stay within the states jurisdiction, or the states court system. The supreme court is the very last step to most cases.

The Supreme Court of the United States is what has been referred to as the "highest" court in the land. it alone has the authority to hear appeals on almost every case set to be decided in the system of the federal court. It also retains the ability to hear "appeals" from the high appellate courts sent from state that involve " questions of federal implications,". For example, a dispute concerning a statute of federal standing or something that arises out of the United States Constitution. That said, fewer than 100 cases are really received and figured out by the Supreme Court in a single year.

In the federal court system, there is only one of the three tiers that is actually mandated by United States Constitution. This is the Supreme Court of the United States. It was formed in 1869 and has always had one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices. As the name suggests, the Supreme Court is the final and "supreme" word on any case that it hears. The Supreme court rules on appeals and also has jurisdiction over certain proprietary cases like those involving high ranking diplomats of both the United States and other foreign nations (Supreme Court of The United States, 2011).