Universal Health Care For A Single Provider

Medical professionals can concentrate on healing the patient rather than insurance procedures and malpractice liability. Doctors have to take classes now simply to understand all the insurance plans out there; they are often restricted by insurance practices, such as what tests can be ordered. Doctors must practice defensive medicine to avoid getting sued. Some physicians are even leaving the profession rather than deal with all these non-medical headaches. A simplified universal health system would allow doctors, nurses, and other medical professions to simply focus on doing what's best for the patient. Medicine is a complex enough subject as it is. Our current system just adds to an already mentally-draining profession.

Therefore, many of these people who are uninsured “delay” treatment until it is absolutely necessary for them to see a doctor (Universal Health Care). By this time most of these patients have reached a point in their sickness where there is far more treatment needed, and therefore, costs more money. Consequently, this has an effect of places who are established to help the uninsured since they take in so many losses many of these establishments are forced to cut back on services or even be forced to shut down (Universal Health Care). To look at it in simple terms, Universal Health care would give everyone a right to carry some form of health coverage. As people who pay taxes, they would be getting coverage for things important in their life. This includes health care. These people would be able to be covered for “preventive care, pregnancy and childbirth, acute, chronic and catastrophic conditions, rehabilitation and end-of-life care” with no bearing on their economic condition (Howard, 2007, p. B.7).

There are two models of healthcare that fall into the realm of universal healthcare, the Beveridge Model and the Bismarck Model. In the Beveridge model the government, which is the sole payer of the system, owns most of the hospitals and clinics (PNHP, 2010). I maintain that the United States is very unlikely to adopt this model, and

In today’s first world countries, they have adopted towards choices that would ultimately benefit their progression in humanity and one way they did was by adopting a universal healthcare; however, the United States is the only country to have not. It is the only country that has one of the highest healthcare expenditures which should result with high-quality healthcare however it seems to be the opposite; the United States spends the most in total health care spending per capita yet has one of the worst healthcare when compared to other first world countries statistics. If a universal healthcare was adopted and properly implemented within the U.S. healthcare system then despite the initial displeasing ramifications I firmly believe that the new structure will bring an improvement in the lives of Americans.

Millions of Americans suffer from not having health insurance each day. Many Americans cannot afford health coverage or they have been denied by insurance companies for outrageous reasons. Because of the current health care system, many families cannot manage to pay for health insurance. Many people with pre-existing illnesses are denied coverage, and many medications that people, such as seniors, need are too costly to pay for. Every day, someone is suffering from a life threatening illness that could easily be cured with proper treatment if they had health coverage. I believe that free universal health care should be available for all Americans because everyone is worthy of medical care even if they cannot afford it.

Universally, health care is known as the maintenance and restoration of health by the treatment and prevention of disease through trained and licensed physicians. As a twenty-year-old, full-time college student, I have not had an actual health care plan since I was in high school. I also make less than $7,000 a year as a part-time substitute teacher. When I get sick, I cannot go to the doctor because I simply cannot afford the cost to be seen by a physician. I do not know what I will do if I ever become seriously ill or injured. I have no savings because all of my money goes to what I need for school, rent, food, and other similar needs for living. Unfortunately, many other Americans are in the same predicament as I am. Although it is known universally what health care is, it is not known how it should be distributed universally. The United States of America should enact a free universal health care plan so that others like me can be provided a bit of not only financial security but also general welfare.

The readings in this module discuss universal healthcare. Universal healthcare was created in order to ensure that every individual could obtain the health services they need without suffering financial hardship when paying for them. In fact, universal healthcare is the type of health care plan where every member of the society can receive health coverage no matter what his or her social status, income, age, gender, race, etc. is. In fact, more than half the countries throughout the world have some degree of a guaranteed right to healthcare for their citizens, which are written in their constitutions. Unfortunately, on the other hand, “The United States is one of 86 countries whose constitutions do not guarantee their citizens any kind of

Health care in the United States is unique in comparison to any other developed country. Most countries that have a health care system in place have a universal health care system where the government plays the major role of being responsible for who is insured and for what. The United States has a system that is managed mostly by employers, private insurance companies and a few government managed programs. Universal health care is not a common practice or even a rare one in the U.S. Based on the demographics of the population the government has some interference with health care delivery. If a group of people meet certain financial and economical factors they will qualify for one of two programs, Medicaid or Medicare, depending on age

The demand would be much higher than the supply. Issues like this are already seen in Canada. According to Americanthinker.com, “In a Commonwealth Fund/Harvard/Harris 2000 survey of physicians in the United States, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, and the United Kingdom, physicians in all countries except the United States reported major shortages of resources important in providing quality care. “(Gibberman) The only difference between those countries and the United States was the fact that we do not have free universal health-care. There are only so many doctors and medication readily availble, that scarcity would limit our population and in turn, decrease our life expectancy and increase the infant mortality rate. However, the scarcity of health-care would also be a pro, because it would offer more jobs. This would in turn boost our economy and several more people would be able to get entry-level jobs in the medical field. Alejandro Chafuen, of Forbes.com, wrote that our economy is coming to a time of great opportunity and challenge and I believe that implementing a universal health-care would provide it with more room to grow.

Health care is a method used for every one of all ages used to help. There are different kinds to help the children and infants and some to help the older people healthcare. People for all ages can benefit from healthcare. Healthcare offers finical protection against crazy service costs. For many people finical covering is a very hard and stressful situation to deal with. In addition, that is where universal healthcare steps in. If the country has a efficient system in place that uses a financing system then the burden of paying thousands of dollars for health issue will not be a problem. Universal healthcare has many different names such as universal coverage, universal health courage or universal care. Some people refer to it as the affordable dream. Universal Healthcare has contributed in the expecting rate of people. In the past was the countries dealing with divesting poverty. This universal coverage was provided at a great rate helping millions with issues’ that would have been impossibly by themselves. The healthcare ensures that everyone everywhere can access quality healthcare. Universal healthcare does not cover

We are known as the wealthiest country in the world but we still have failed to give people

Universal healthcare can be defined as a universal insurance of medical services are normally sponsored from a single payer system, and the organization behind the universal healthcare was mainly supported by the government. Universal healthcare is

The aim of this paper was to gather and find information over universal health care. Research will demonstrate the varying ideas on universal health care. The goal of the paper for the reader is to inform them well enough on the topic to be able to pick a side and make a solid argument. The reader will be informed on different ideas that surround universal health care. The combined sources should be enough information for both sides of the argument.

These passages present a discussion concerning universal health care. This is an important debate to all health care recipients in the U.S. because of the potential troubles that could be associated with universal health care. The two positions argue whether or not there should be universal health care in America. Both viewpoints have valid claims warranting consideration. For example, evidence indicates universal health care would be more affordable. In contrast, opposing evidence suggest that it would not. While both sides of the issue have valid points, the claim that universal health care should not be provided by the government is the stronger position, the position supported by a preponderance of the evidence cited in the passages. The most convincing and forceful reasons in support of this position are that the government could ration healthcare and decide if a person receives treatment or not, patients may have to wait long periods of time to be treated, and no part of the government runs efficiently. Accordingly, these reasons and opposing viewpoints will be discussed next.

Universal health care models are currently adopted by many countries worldwide. Although a superficial look at these systems may show many similarities, a detailed analysis shows differences in their philosophies, standards of care, delivery models, and recipients’ expectations. This paper takes a closer look at the universal health care models in Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, and Japan in comparison to the American system.