Universal Healthcare System Research Paper

A national health care system in the United States has been a contentious topic of debate for over a century. Social reformists have been fighting for universal health care for all Americans, while the opposition claims that a “social” heath care system has no place in the ‘Land of the Free’.

It has provided more Americans with health coverage, no denials for pre-existing conditions, insurance is more affordable for some but higher for others, no time limits on care, more screenings are covered, and lower perspiration drug costs (Larrat, Marcoux, & Vogenberg, 2012). The negative effects, many have to pay higher premiums and out-of-pocket expenses than before, taxes are rising to help offset the cost, longer wait times when seeing a physician, and employers are choosing to pay the penalty or cutting hours to

Insurance companies will have a guaranteed customer base which would allow them to inflate costs because citizens would not have cheaper alternatives. Also since insurance companies will have to cover individuals who are very sick and need constant hospital care, these individuals' hospital costs will be paid through higher premiums from the rest of the population's insurance. This would again reduce the amount of money going to citizens' pockets. In addition, insurance companies will have access to add coverage for diseases and treatments that may affect only a minute population but that the whole population will have to buy as it is the basic and cheapest plan. The best example to see what the effects of a health care mandate would be is to look at the state of Massachusetts. A mandate, similar to the one being discussed nationally, was passed in Massachusetts in 2006. The outcome was that "younger and healthier individuals [were forced] to pay higher premiums in order to subsidize premiums for the old and sick" (Tanner). The plan has "cost taxpayers a great deal of money, ... [resulted] in a projected budget deficit... and "between half and two-thirds of those uninsured before the plan was implemented remain so" (Tanner). The plan did not result in 100% coverage, which was its main goal, and also

Many people only see the cost aspect of healthcare coverage and not the overall effect it has on the lives of everyone around us. By requiring everyone to have

There are over 45 million people in the United States who are uninsured when it comes to healthcare. Many are uninsured due to the expensive health care costs. To combat this, the Obama Care administration created the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to provide nationalized healthcare. The Affordable Care Act is meant to expand health coverage, lower health care costs and hold insurance companies accountable. The Affordable Care Act will allow more people to be insured but the issue lies in the question, do the costs outweigh the benefits? The Affordable Care Act will be used in an attempt to lower health care coverage costs for citizens. An example can be seen from a report in the Kaiser Family Foundation. The premium is required

We can perhaps study the ways other countries have effectively implemented this system. For example, "Europe has a system in which all residents pay into a common fund that creates a pool of money and provides benefits to all". In order to go through with a universal system the United States needs to figure out a way to adopt this system that provides care to all citizens. 2 million people become uninsured every month because they cant afford

With every system there are always pro and cons that come with how the system works and who is affected or helps the most. According to the article by Athar, some of the pros that were discussed about the US healthcare system were repeals individual mandate, reduces the federal deficit in the long run, no discrimination against people with pre-existing conditions (Athar, 2017). I agree that repeals individual mandate is a pro since it requires “all individuals to purchase health insurance” (2017). Even is someone is the healthiest person nobody can detect when they are going to be sick or when something tragic can happen. It allows a valuable idea to be insured. Another pro that I agree with is no discrimination against people with pre-existing conditions. This means that nobody can be overlooked or denied with pre-existing conditions.

In the United States many issues seem to arise during times of struggle and what some consider unfairness. One of these being the topic of health care. As this problem popped up so did some solutions did as well. One of these being a universal health care. That to some would seem to get rid of all this "unfair health care" problem all together. However, others say that with a universal health care, the costs would rise and the quality could rapidly degrade. Both of these sides show very true factual evidence for their supporting claims.

Throughout history, it has been debated that a universal health care system should be offered to the United State’s people by their government. Universal Health Care means that every legal citizen in the designated region will receive coverage regardless or health, income, race, gender, wealth, etc. The purpose of this is to provide everyone the quality care they need without the highly expensive costs. Ideally, the government would provide this coverage, eliminating the big insurance agencies’ high costs, because unlike these private companies, the government isn’t in the business of making money but rather providing the best possible resources to their citizens. Many other successful countries

Health care costs in the United States has become an extremely controversial issue. The major issue is that most people can't afford health insurance, but if the country would adopt a universal health care system it could fix that issue. Some people disagree, and think that a universal system would be too expensive, but if everyone paid their fair share it would be less of a hassle for the nation itself.

The country of Canada has a dynamic health care system which functions as a publicly-funded, single-payer system. Health care in the country is commonly referred to as Medicare, with spending decisions regarding it being made at the provincial level. In the system, the Canadian government pays for over 70% of total health care which allows for universal health care to be provided to Canadian citizens (“Exploring the 70/30 Split…,” 2005). As a result, citizens do not have to pay out of pocket for health care. Due to factors such as the aforementioned, it is plausible to reason why a plurality of Canadians are satisfied with their health care system. Nevertheless, there are issues present in the system, such as patient wait times, that need

National healthcare has been a hot button issue around dinner tables in America for years. Everyone seems to have an option on what will or will not work, how our county will afford it and what a plan would entail. Although we are unsure of how a plan would affect the country or the average American. Whether one is for or against the current healthcare plans that have been put in place by our government, We can all agree that the need for a national healthcare system is due to rising healthcare cost,

The cost of healthcare has always been a sore spot for people. Bringing the cost down and increasing the access to care by creating a universal healthcare system (a system that provides health care and financial protection to all citizens) may be beneficial. However, some people believe the care wouldn't be as good and it would cost too much. There’s many pros and cons of a universal healthcare system.

For some time now, Americans have been wanting to switch to a universal healthcare system. A healthcare system where all Americans will have access to the proper healthcare that is affordable and fits their needs. Some solutions that can be implemented are replacing for-profit insurance companies, reforming the healthcare system, and hiring insurance companies that have slow cost growths. These are good solutions because there are a large number of Americans who do not have health insurance and desperately need it. However, we should not put a national health care system into effect because our current healthcare system is in a corrupt state and has to be addressed before we can move forward.

Some points against HeathCare is that it costs $125 Billion total (total) to ensure every person with poor health is treated, and people who are uninsured are less likely to get medical attention. However the only thing worth more than money is a person's life. Everyone has a right to the care and attention they need