6.
I work for a small health system that unfortunately hasn’t yet been able to consolidate into one universal hospital information system (HIS) solution. Given the disparity that exists, while unfortunate and cumbersome to our patient base, the decision was made to employ different patient portals for each of the two main hospital campuses. The two different patient portal products we implemented were RelayHealth (McKesson) and MobileMD (Siemens).
Both of these tethered patient portal solutions offer sleek user interfaces that enhance the review of available patient health information above and beyond the Meaningful Use 2 required Consolidated-CDA (CCDA) document. By parsing out the data contained in the CCDA, the portals provide an elegant,
…show more content…
Unfortunately, the RelayHealth product does not have any portable apps available at this time, however they are under development. In the interim, they do have a mobile version of the web-based portal.
We found interoperability amongst different source HISs to be a huge benefit for RelayHealth, although we aren’t taking advantage of that functionality...which is something that still doesn’t make sense to me given the amount of resources invested in bringing up two different portals. We were informed that the MobileMD product would only work with the HIS at one of our facilities and not be interoperable with the HIS at the other. Ultimately, it seems like the logical choice would have been to implement the RelayHealth solution at the enterprise level, but alas, I
…show more content…
This process can be a time-consuming process, but is invaluable in the construction of the rest of the business continuity plan. As you can imagine, the time and effort involved in performing this analysis on a large health system that is in the upper levels of EMR maturity can be quite different than that of a lone physician office just getting started with moving away from paper records. At the heart of the analysis is the what resources, at a bare minimum, are required to make sure that the organization can still provide services safely and effectively, while maintaining fiscal responsibilities. In a highly integrated large health system, this can included many information systems along with the information technology that links them together, whereas in the physician office, it could be limited to a paper based business continuity “resource kit” that contains all necessary forms and paperwork to continue to
This case analysis of Stanford’s Hospital and Clinics (SHC) electronic medical record (EMR) system implementation will focus on how the healthcare organization focused on resolving a problem to meet regulatory pressures and responded to an opportunity to create operational efficiency, by capitalizing on the use of information technology to help reduce costs. We will discuss the organization’s IT problems, opportunities, and the alternatives available to address each. We will summarize an analysis of potential alternatives including the organization’s EMR system of choice and conclude with a recommendation to the Board on how to rollout the new system.
Three of the telecommunication giants have stepped into wireless healthcare management arena in efforts to provide advanced medical care through new digital delivery systems. Verizon, AT&T and Sprint have created partnerships with health care monitoring vendors to provide in home services to
Relay Health and American Well Corporation are two companies that provide telemedicine services. Relay Health facilitates web visits for 13 insurers and 25,000 providers. Through Relay Health a patient can schedule doctor appointments, renew prescriptions,
Dr. Eric Cooper is the medical director for Snohomish County Emergency Medical Services (SCEMS). SCEMS is made up of numerous Fire Departments and Private Ambulance providers to serve the citizens of the county (E. Cooper, personal communication, May 23, 2016). All of the Fire Department services are on the same instance of Electronic Health Record (EHR). Implementation of the EHR began in 2010, with Advanced Life Support entities. In 2013 the EHR vendor added a feature called Health Data Exchange (HDE) as an option. This feature allows bi-directional flow of information from the pre-hospital EHR to the hospital EHR. For the first time, pre-hospital providers can get outcomes on the patients they treat, and hospitals can have the
Two organizations migrating to a common health information system would need a system that meets current regulatory requirements, meets the needs of the combined organization and their practice environment. The implementation of a common health information system would require an interdisciplinary group of forward thinking innovators, and an interoperable electronic medical record system that includes standard nursing terminology.
The high cost of healthcare continues to rise and many in the United States are optimistic for health information technology to reduce and improve our current situation. Health IT encompasses a broad array of new technologies designed to manage and share health-related information. When properly implemented, these systems can help coordinate patient care, reduce medical errors, and improve administrative efficiency. Therefore, implementing a Regional Health Information Organization (RHIO) will help the National Health Information Network (NHIN) achieve their goals in improving quality of care for the citizens of the United States. Thus, in order for the health IT to deliver on its promise, several obstacles must be overcome.
Integration will lead to superior diagnoses as doctors will have access to medical records from across the country, enabling them to draw on the diagnoses of other doctors facing similar situations. It will also allow for seamless care as records for the same patients will be instantly accessible and fully up to date wherever they go. The application layer will be standardized, with a consumer-facing mobile and web application and a doctor-facing web portal. While the way care is administered differs from hospital to hospital and clinic to clinic, what a practitioner needs from an IT solution will remain relatively constant.
Healthcare reform has created incentives to increase patient engagement to increase accountability, healthcare outcome and lower healthcare cost. In the early days of this movement, web portals were created with basic functions of requesting appointments, prescription refills, and paying medical bills (Butterfield, 2013). Today, patient portals allow users to access dictated visit reports, labs, approve access controls combined with the function of the web portals. As more health information is pushed to the portals, the users (patients and family) are more involved with healthcare decisions and more knowledgeable on available options that meet individual need.
Anita Ground also stresses on the huge importance of this planning stage by using a concept of system life cycle. It consists of feasibility study, analysis, design, programming, implementation, and lastly maintenance (Ground, 2011, VA TMS training material). The analysis phase in particular would coincide with what the author Yoshihashi is presenting in figuring out office strategy and researching EHR options. Identification of stakeholders and system requirement would play a critical role in EHR adoption (Ground, 2011). Stakeholders would include patients, family, clinicians, billing, registration, and coding as well as the external users such as Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Bottom line is that the new system being purchased would need to provide meaningful use to the clinic based on the current certification standards.
Changes in current health care practices, the aging baby-boomer population, and the higher acuity of patients has created a need for change and adaptability with the health care industry. Kaiser is an organization who has shown the ability to continuously change in order to reduce costs while improving efficient quality patient care. The investment on information technology (IT) advancements such as the implantation of electronic health records (EHRs) and use of a patient portal system is one way the organization has shown readiness to meet the health care needs of patients. KP in collaboration with five other healthcare organizations created a Care Connectivity Consortium, enabling secure electronic retrieval of current
My facility has rolled out the implementation of Epic electronic health system. The implementation process started at the primary acute hospital setting, beginning on a test unit. It was then rolled out to the other hospital locations. All health care providers were mandated to
Brailer (2005) acknowledges that a sizeable number of citizens receive treatment from multiple providers at a time. Interoperability is a gateway for many business ventures in healthcare to accommodate for patients being admitted in multiple provider organizations. All healthcare professionals, especially managers, must communicate effectively. A good example of interoperability is transformation of electronic medical records, or recruiting physician specialists to operate on a specific procedure (Hellberg & Gronlund, 2013).
The process of migrating from paper-based charts to electronic records is a complicated process that requires dealing with all issues. The process has no particular route, but strategic planning and execution are necessary so that all risk issues get dealt before they happen. The article proposes changes made depending on the ambulatory care. The goals must become tactical, reasonable and measurable. The process requires a timeline that’s needed to ensure human resource and financial resources meet all the demands. An assessment of the hospital’s readiness determines the software and hardware gap, employee competencies and training, and human technology interaction.
Health Informatics created two main categories such as clinical and administrative information systems to meet the needs of one or more department within the health care organization. For the clinical information system, it is set to meet the needs in improving patient care. Therefore, the clinical information system (CIS) categories provide nurses information systems (NIS) that support the way nurses documents the care that given to the patients. However, to improve the delivery of nursing care, the healthcare organization must adopt a computer system that can successfully incorporate tools that will benefit nursing. There is two vendors’ software that implies these characteristics for the
The variation in information needs across any healthcare provider organization forces healthcare information technologies (HIT) platforms, systems, processes and procedures to align its design to support the unique information needs of each department and role. The greater this alignment of HIT systems and technologies to specific administrator, doctor, nurse and lab technician roles, the higher the level of overall systems performance and results attained (Agrawal, Grandison, Johnson, Kiernan, 2007). Just as an enterprise has strategic information needs that help to define the future direction of the business, healthcare provider organizations also have a comparable set of strategic information needs. The administrative roles in healthcare providers need to have a consolidated view of the organization from a cost, quality management, service level, patient recovery rate, patient satisfaction and profitability standpoint as well (Middleton, 2005). All of these factors are often gathered together in a dashboard that administrators often rely on to manage the core areas of their healthcare business (Leung, 2012). Administrator's information needs are also longer term in nature and more oriented towards the development of strategic initiatives that will last several years, requiring