Unjust Laws Is Morally Wrong

In Martin Luther King’s, “Letter from Birmingham Jail” he explains what he thinks is a just law and what makes an unjust law.So what makes a just and an unjust law? A just law, according to King, is a man made code that squares with the moral code. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. In the world we live in today most laws are just, but many issues are caused by prejudice people. Many are afraid to suffer the consequences that come with standing up for what is right. For me, suffering the consequences would be worth it if not everyone is given equal rights, one race is being attacked about a certain law, and if a law forces me to do something I refuse to do.

The issue of morality is a touchy one. Morality is defined as the values of a person or society of what is right and what is wrong. Each person’s sense of morality guides them in their actions and making decisions. Morals are very important because the actions of each individual can lead to consequences that can affect other people. Only by living by our morals can we maintain our sense of humanity and compassion for others, and be happy in ourselves.

Morality in its basic definition, is the knowledge between what is right and what is wrong. In Joan Didion’s essay, “On Morality,” she uses examples to show how morality is used to justify actions and decisions by people. She explains that morality can have a profound effect on the decisions that people chose to make. I think that morality is an idea that is different for every individual based on morals and background.

Morality is a particular system of values and principles of conduct. My interpretation of this is the distinction of right and wrong. Everyone has a personal morals, whether it’s through a group, organization, or just the way their parents brought them up. Morals help create an organized society, they are like unwritten laws. There are so many morals out there the government could not make them all laws, so although morals help govern the world they are not actual laws. Without morals the world would be nothing but chaos. Being honest, fair and just, making the world a better place, respecting others, and being open minded are just a few examples.

"One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws." Martin Luther King's words, which just correspond with the above assertion, perfectly tell us what to do in face of laws, either just or unjust.

Morals guide a person's standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them to do. A morals can be for all of society or an individual`s beliefs. Morals play a role in our innocence. Innocence

Palmer describes moral norms as those which govern human behavior and character development. Moral norms serves as standards by which a worldview requires, prohibits, or allows behaviors and the development of character traits of one’s personality and thinking (pg.49). Aesthetic norms are ones which allow human beings to make judgments about what is considered beautiful, pleasing, or sublime (pg.50).

A child refuses to eat his vegetables. An office worker consistently comes in late. A man refuses to pay taxes on the basis that taxes infringe upon his property rights. Citizens are arrested in the park for handing out food to the homeless. Many different types of disobedience exist in a free society, ranging from the insular to the national and from unjust to just. That a free society inevitably spawns disobedience is well settled, since having the choice to disobey is part of being free, but the effect and the role that disobedience plays in a free society have been extensively debated. Some argue that disobedience is anathema to a free society because it leads to only more disobedience and suffering, while others argue that disobedience

In philosophy, it is often difficult to formulate an accurate definition of whether an action is morally just or unjust. In order to comprehensively explain the morality of a specific action, the definition must meet the standards of both necessary and sufficient conditions. Necessary conditions are the components of the definition that must be true of the action in order to classify the action as either morally just or unjust. Although the necessary condition must be a component of the definition, it alone does not solidify the morality of an action, which is why the sufficient condition must also be addressed. The conditions that, if accurately met, guarantees that the definition achieves its purpose is the sufficient condition. When applying these stipulations to the relativist view presented in class: If a person S utters a statement of the form “action A is morally wrong,” this statement is true if and only if S believes it is true, it is not difficult to argue that this particular view does not meet the standards of necessary or sufficient conditions.

“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” –Martin Luther King, Jr. Youth crime throughout Canada is a contentious issue in our society, and we as citizens, must correctly deal with such young offenders. The Youth Criminal Justice Act, a Canadian enactment that came into effect on April 1st, 2003, was created principally to battle youth crime using lenient methodology. Essentially, its aim/goal is to comprehend the delinquent’s wrongdoings, and suggest a punishment to treat the offender. However, the Youth Criminal Justice Act takes a much too passive approach towards discipline and ultimately lets offenders go free with minor sanctions. In fact, often young criminals re commit an offense soon

moral principles that govern a person's or group's behavior. This is how the dictionary defines ethics. Different people have different sets of ethics and sometimes they do not coincide with

Morality is defined as a recognition or belief that explains why some behaviors are bad or good. In simple words, morality refers to values relating to the distinction between wrong and right or good and bad. Few morals are easily accepted and are only questioned by some fringes of society who might disagree with such morals. These individuals on the fringes can be bad or good. The ones who reject socially accepted moral does not necessarily mean that they are good persons. Thus, one can say that each individual has morals that are different from each other (Joseph).

The morals of one is directly connected to his/her group. The person is seeking approval of the group and does specific things that are approved of the group. What is right is what the group or social community says is right.

In today’s continuous changing world, the one thing that remains constant for most of us is our personal value system of beliefs, known as ethics. Ethics can also be referred to as morals. Therefore, ethics are those morals that reflect and indicate issues that concern behaviors that are right or wrong and the good and bad habits of individual character. This important standard of beliefs can in most cases create the difference in attitudes from others both

The definition of morality or what constitutes proper morals is a difficult task and may be explained differently 100 times if one were to ask 100 people. Generally speaking, being moral is conforming to the standards of good or right. This vague definition is open for many interpretations. As mentioned, morality is not recognized internationally or is scrutinized as a weakness by the realist community, at least not openly so. Morality has played a role in international affairs and war for centuries.