Unwind Vs The Giver Essay

When it comes to the rights of the inhabitants and the rights of the government in The Giver. The government and the citizens have a lot of similarities but they change depending on the person’s job. For example most people have a curfew but for people that clean the streets at night they are allowed out after the

My first reason on why I think the giver is a dystopia because they don’t get to choose their jobs. They have ceremony every year and when you turn twelve they get assigned a job. People will get assigned a job that they might not like, but there is a chance that they could get a job they like. For example on page 60“ in a firm, commanding voice she announced, ‘Jonas has been selected to be our next Receiver Of Memory”. Jonas was nervous at first about his job because the chief elder has described his job as painful and that the pain was “ indescribable.” Later he then just wants to be a regular child instead of being the Reciever.

While modern day society and The Giver society may have similarities, they also have lots of differences. The present society and the novel’s society have differences involving the rules, family, and leadership. To start, a modern day society has examples of differences and comparisons against the novel. These include the rules, family, and leadership.

Throughout life people make mistakes, either minor or major. If a person either makes one of them, no one can make an assumption that they are horrible. In the novel, Unwind, written by Neal Shusterman, the society believes that a child has thirteen years to prove themselves worthy. If they fail, they are signed up to be unwound which involves taking their body parts and giving them to other people that are in need of them. Most people believe that this is beneficial to the society since the child is still alive but in a divided state.

One comparison connecting our modern-day society to the one in the novel, would be they are both run by a government. In the novel, “The Giver” it states that , “The community was so meticulous ordered, and the choices are carefully made by the government.” Basically the committee takes the place of the government and sets the laws also “The Chief Of Elders”. Therefore, their society is run by something that has full control over their community just like in our modern-day society. In our society, we also have laws that governs our actions and require us to follow in order to be safe. For instance, if a citizen breaks any of our laws there will be a conquense such as fine, community service, or even time in jail.

In the utopian community, everything is governed by rules, birth, climate, jobs, partnership, and family. When sameness was created it meant no one could have the same name and not one person could look the same which brings up the topic of the mentions of euthanasia (Hanson). In the book, a pair of twins were born, not allowing two of the same face exist in the community the newborn child weighing the least was considered as weak and “released”, this is a word mentioned throughout the book that is a sugarcoating for the word kill (Kendall). Since the publication of The Giver, there have been a number of attempts to ban the book in schools, because of the themes that are mentioned in the book has been challenged, criticized, and even succeeding to be banned in some schools.

The setting of The Giver is bleak and lackluster, portraying everyone and everything as the same. There are no differences or any uniqueness. All of the families have the same amount of people in their household. For example, the book describes families as “two children-one male, one female- to each family unit. It was written very clearly in the rules” (11). People dress, speak, and even think similarly. With the strict rules the town makes force everyone to be the same. The citizens have to talk in a certain way or they will get punished. The girls cannot do their hair differently than others. Children are not allowed to ride bicycles until they turn nine years old. The

“They had been brought to the stage by the Nurturers who had cared for them since birth.” (Lowry 11). In The Giver, the Nurturers design and care for the babies, not for the other children. The Nurturers take care of only the little ones, making the older children to be cared for by the parents, not the care specialists. In our world, that is like all parents not caring for their children and the children are left to their aunts and uncles.

In Lois Lowry's The Giver, freedom of choice is limited. In The Giver, their society is made up of rules. It seems like the citizens don't think for themselves. There are certain ages where you get things, like a bike. You don't get to choose your job or what you want to do with your life, you get it assigned.

Even though The Giver employs theoretical perspectives of behaviorism and existentialism, the application of these theories have strengths and weaknesses. Based on my personal reflection, it appears as though the film did a good job overall in demonstrating the theories through the use of the setting, plot, and characters. One strength of this movie in terms of behaviorism is the way it employs concepts of operant conditioning. From the first lines spoken in the film to the end of the film where the humanity of the community is restored, there are clear applications of rewards and punishment. Besides how well the film employs operant conditioning, the emphasis on how social learning can influence

When you compare the dystopian society in the book The Giver and our modern day society you will come to find out that there are many similarities and differences. The society in The Giver differs greatly from our society today. A difference is that their government is much more controlling than ours. We still have laws but they are not nearly as strict as the dystopian society. The dystopian society in The Giver limits almost everything known from the past except with one person : the Receiver.

The rules in The Giver’s community are not similar at all. If three rules are broken in The Givers Society you are released, at first everybody thought that it meant you leave the Community and get sent elsewhere, but later we found out that it is really the doing of being killed. The person being released gets injected with a needle and soon dies. Similarly, if a law is broken in our modern-day society, we can be sent to jail, however if it is a minor law, it is possible you will be fined. In The Giver’s society, feelings are not cared for,

The author uses the idea of childhood innocence to his advantage through the novel. He is able to show the obvious bad parts of unwinding through various main characters feelings. Connor has feeling of betrayal that serve a way the reader can relate to the character, imposed when he explains his feelings of rejection “from the hearts of those who are supposed to love him” after finding out that he would be unwound. Lev also conveys with the readers his “fury at a universe pretending to be fair and just”. Along with clear faults in the process of unwinding, the author uses the viewpoints of his young characters to explore significant issue in our society. When Connor is being taken to the graveyard, he is forced to consider topics such as unwinding and abortion with three other boys in his crate. WHile they discuss issues regarding unwinding, Shusterman puts an emphasis on the topics that are relevant today. Emby represents the present day pro-life argument, while Connor takes the side of pro-choice, saying that a soul “comes when a baby’s born into the world”. Hayden admits to having started “our own little Heartland War”, connecting the boys’ discussion with the current debate of abortion. The author is not trying to push his beliefs

The result is, as praised by Jonas’ family unit, that the decisions the Elders make are never incorrect or unsuitable. They seem omniscient, and this strengthens their claim to power, their right to make decisions for the whole community as they are excellent at it. As has been shown above, the novel contains various forms of oppression. In order for “people” to express their individuality and humanity, freedom of choice is essential. Dehumanization is observed in The Giver’s society, and life within the communities becomes deformed, manipulated, and far from being a utopia. Infact, due to all the dehumanization, fear, surveillance and inequality shown in this society, it now strongly resembles dystopian one.

Rules, Rituals and Customs are what make a community organized and proper. In order for a community to strive, they must first learn how to adapt to changes and to enforce and respect rules that sometimes may seem absurd to others. In the book “The Giver” by Lois Lowry, the people live in a world where almost anything is prohibited. Albeit their rules and regulations mean well, it may seem as if it is too restrictive and also tend to portray the people as having no freedom or choices over their own lives. In the book, the rules that you have to share your dreams with others, to take a pill that prevents you from feeling love and the prohibition of books can all have its advantages and disadvantages.