In the documentary, Up from Slavery: 18th century Colonial America Under the Rule of the British Empire, the story of slavery begins on the coast of West Africa where thousands of African people are unceasingly enslaved and placed upon overcrowded ships on which they must endure the cruelest of conditions. Many did not live through the journey due to disease, malnutrition, or in some cases murder, such as the Zong Massacre where 132 slaves were thrown overboard in a monstrous act committed by the captain all for the sake of an insurance claim. Out of the 12 million slaves who endured the grueling Middle Passage, only about 5,000 were transported to the United States. However, by the time of the Civil War, that number increased to 4 million …show more content…
Oftentimes, due to the strenuous labor required to work the plantations, southern plantation owners used mostly male slaves. The lack of female slaves caused a lower reproduction rate and required more importation of slaves. Lastly, the North constituted a third type of system. With an unsuitable climate for the large cultivation of a single crop, the North put slaves on small farms or to work in the household. Despite the idea that the North resisted slavery, places such as Massachusetts, New York, and Rhode Island served as centers for the North American slave trade.
Not only was slavery divided up into different systems, but the roles of the slaves varied greatly. Field slaves were subjected to strenuous labor and strict overseers. They usually worked from dusk until dawn without receiving a day off. On the other hand, household slaves took care of the children, chores, and food and were sometimes seen as part of the family. There is a misconception that household slaves had an easier life than those working in the fields. However, regardless of whether or not someone was a household slave or a field slave, they were slaves nonetheless. The documentary fuels these misconceptions by making things seem right that Washington only worked his slaves six days a week, giving them Sunday off, and was known to have treated them well.
Whether or not slave masters treated their slaves well, slaves all faced the possibility of excessive
The origins and development of slavery in Britain’s North American colonies during the colonial period can be traced down to the fact that North American colonies were created for the economic profit of Great Britain. Reasons for the development of slavery in the North American colonies can be the switch to slavery from indentured servitude due to the desire of free labor and the results of Bacon’s rebellion, the introduction of cash crops such as sugar and tobacco and the introduction of the plantation system, and the easy access of slaves due to the triangular trade and the middle passage.
The origins and development of slavery within Britain’s North American colonies in the period 1607 to 1776 was majorly in part by the English need for economic power. England had just arose as the strongest naval of the North Atlantic had they had to keep their high standing in the world. Bacon’s Rebellion, the profit received by cash crops, and the ability to easily purchase slaves through trade highly boosted Britain’s economy. The colonists within the British colony kept through economic standing and power by making themselves higher than any other through slavery.
He notes that, the slavery institution made them forget about their origin, and anything else that entails their past, and even when they were born. The slaves forgot everything about their families, and none knew about their family because, they were torn from them without any warning. Douglass explains how they went without food, clothing and even sleep because their masters were cruel to them. American slavery took advantage of black laborers as they were beaten mercilessly without committing any offense. They were not treated as human beings, but as property that could be manipulated in any way. The slavery institution was harsh for the Africans especially women who were regularly raped, and forced to bear their masters children and if they declined, they were maimed or killed.
One of the key arguments in “The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass” as well as in other narratives about slaves is inequality. Douglass attempts to show us how African American slaves were still human beings like their white counterparts, there have been numerous instances where it is shown that many whites did not want to accept slaves as true humans. Frederick
Legal treatment of the slaves changed marginally from colony to colony, as indicated by the territory’s economic structure. For instance, the northern colonies had less slaves an inevitably banned slavery. In spite of the fact that slavery was abolished in 1804, they were stilled financially reliant on the institution. A considerable lot of the northerners vested in guaranteeing that slavery in the south kept on developing because they relied on the export of fish, liquor and dairy products
(3) When first reading these narratives one would often assume, by what history tells us, that slave owners were cruel, hated men who often beat slaves severely if they committed even the slightest infraction. While this depiction does stand true for some slave owners, I was surprised to find that most of the former slaves interviewed in the “Slave Narratives” often held their masters in high regards, referring to them as kind and good. Former slave Harriett Gresham even goes as far to say that her master, Mr. Bellinger was “exceptionally kind”. Many slaves in the narratives described their masters as good to his slaves and never whipping them unless it was absolutely necessary. However, when the former slaves spoke of the “paterollers”, white men who roamed the roads in search of runaway slaves often beating them and returning them to their owners, they were described as being very cruel to slaves showing no sympathy to any slave found running away from a
In the north owners usually owned only one or two slaves. Historians have figured that these owners could have done without them if necessary. Owning slaves was less a commitment than a response to labor needs. That is why we see blacks working in their owners’ shops. Historians like Shane white argue that slaves now had an advantage over slaves in any other area, because these slaves were picking up trades that could help in their future journey. Rosivach on page 552 talks about how slaves helped the economy. White talked about the trades they picked up and now Rosivach expands on that. Since most slave owners only owned a few slaves the owner’s main priority was to make ends meet for his family. Rosivach talks about how slaves could run the owner’s shops if the owners had to leave for a short period of time. Slaves also helped speed up production. With two people working it helped the owner make more money. They were not running large scaled operations but simple community ran business. Rosivach also states that even if someone did not own a slave in the north they could produce the same amount of production as a slave and his owner. Rosivach is making the claim that slaves are expendable and not a dire need as they were in the south.
Mainly demographics. In Latin America, namely Brazil, the slaves’ male to female ratio was quite large, in the South this ratio was about equal. Although Latin American slaves had a larger population of slaves being imported from Africa, the Southern United States had a higher number of birth, thus raising their numbers immensely. This led to the declining slave population in Latin America because the mortality rate was extremely high and the birth rate extremely low. “The average number of children born to an early nineteenth-century southern slave woman was 9.2—twice as many as in the West Indies.” The differences in the population held by slaves were quite different as well. In Latin America the norm seemed to be that wealthy landowners had working plantations but did not necessarily live on the plantations. This led to the appointment of paid managers, or overseers, being the one in charge of making sure the slaves performed the work needed to produce a profit, unlike their counterparts in the United States where majority of the landowners resided on the
During the 18th century, society was made up of slaves owners who were in debt, and a large slave population. From there, they traded the slaves for money to pay off those debts, while, also, increasing the slave population by expanding their influence.
African slaves were brought to North America which it began in Virginia and British colonies are the one who brought slaves on ships. Most of the slaves start in the south and not the reason to have slaved for economic trade. During the colonial period of the 19th century, there was a slave code law that said about the rights and responsibilities of slave owners have power control, African slaves. Also, there was abolition movement in Civil War 1865 for slaveries to fight for their freedom. The main point of state nature can pertain to slavery in America which colonies used nature laws.
The Transatlantic slave trade was a horrific event where between 1526 to 1867 over twelve million slaves were captured and were sent from their native homes in Africa to the Americas. The African slaves that were captured over those centuries were shipped in bulk (between 30,000 a year in the late seventeenth century and 85,000 one hundred years later). Approximately, six percent of the African slaves were taken to North America in the eighteenth century and the majority of enslaved Africans were sent South America and parts of what is now Central America. In the Southern states of America, a single slave owner owned and housed about a thousand slaves. The slave population in the United States grew and this mainly due to the high fertility rate. However, due to the living environment many of the enslaved infants had a high mortality rate did not make it past their first year of life. This was the result of the children being fed food that lacked the nutrients they needed and they were breastfed too early. Due to the unhealthy environment, slaves contracted many terrible illnesses and diseases (i.e. blindness, skin lesions, Vitamin D deficiency, Diarrhea, whooping cough, etc.) that they usually succumbed to without a way to get proper treatment for them. In the mid-nineteenth century, the population of enslaved Blacks tripled from the beginning of the nineteenth century. Over a million people were displaced because of the slave trade. Overall, the main purpose of the slave
Slavery was a ruthless and dreadful way of life for all slaves. Yet there were differences in rank between slaves. Minor class slaves were “field slaves”. Superior class slaves were “house slaves”. The daily routines of these slaves differed to a great extent. Field slaves only function was production. Their duties were to plant and cultivate the crops, clear the land, flame the undergrowth, roll the wood, split rails, transport water, restore fences, spread fertilizer, and break the soil. Working since sunrise to sunset was purely and analogy for slave labor, they regularly worked before sunrise and considerably past dusk. A house slave every day routine incorporated
One negative factor of colonial life was the treatment of slaves. Being a slave was very hard and brutal. Since farming cash crop was hard colonist bought slaves to do the work. According to U.S history.com, the starts worked from sunup to sundown six days a week and had food “not suitable for an animal to eat.” Many masters treated their slaves horribly making them work hard with little clothing or food. Also many treated and hurt them leaving them with life time of injuries. In the text, “tied his hands and gave him one hundred lashes on his bare back, because he lacked three pounds of his task, which was valued at six cents." ().This shows how brutal the masters were just for a little thing. The masters berated their slaves just for
Slaves who landed in North America apparently had a better life than those in South American and the Caribbean Islands. The lives of slaves within North America also varied greatly. The film states that there were three different systems of slavery in the colonies. In Virginia and Maryland, slaves mostly worked on tobacco plantations and farms. In South Carolina and Georgia, slaves worked on rice plantations which required more vigorous work than tobacco. Also, because laborer was harder in these states, they had less female slaves and would have to continue to import Africans in order to sustain the population. This resulted in a stronger African identity for blacks in South Carolina and Georgia. The northern colonies differed from the south with the simple fact that they had far fewer slaves. Most slaves in the north were only farm workers and household servants. African slaves still faced many difficulties in the North which included the unfamiliar cold climate and being left to fend for one’s self in old age. The film continues with telling the account of former slaves and their experiences which either differentiated from the
This represents numerous things to the history community over the 18th and 19th centuries. Personal details and text about the narratives focuses on former slaves mainly during the first civil war. Many ex-slaves were interviewed over their past life and experience as slaves, they had a different narration and some similarities on what they encountered. In fact Civil War (Luis, 1989).Historians noted that former slaves’ left little-written evidence about their experience, narratives left best feeling and attitude of American slaves. Writing themselves into history, Africans Americans wrote about themselves in an attempt to the discussion of the voice of the slaves. This was a clear indication that actually the slavery started before the Civil War.