Us Department Of Commerce Case Study

1.1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………. 1.2 The Company………………………………………………………………………………….. 1.3 Goals and Objectives………………………………………………………………………. Philanthropic Goals……………………………………………………………………. Business Goals……………………………………………………………………………. Strategic Goals……………………………………………………………………………. 1.4 Our Product……………………………………………………………………………………. 1.5 Mission Statement………………………………………………………………………….. 1.6 The Market……………………………………………………………………………………..

With the threat of Congress cutting NASA 's budget, the United State 's sixty year preeminence in space exploration is in serious peril..

Our loss of standing as the number one space faring nation will also greatly impact the nation on a psychological level. Americans have always been pioneers, innovators, and technological leaders; if we lose that standing it could cause a national identity crisis. Now we will break down the costs and benefits of the United States space program to help us better understand whether or not we should continue to fund it with taxpayer money.

5- Formulating Goals and Strategies: where the Broad Community reviews the seven strategic issues and suggests activities that could be implemented to address each of these issues.

Through innovation in technology, the space exploration programs of the United States have achieved several benefits for today’s society. Many studies have shown that space programs have encouraged innovation of various

Technology had been an important element of success in World War II. The advancement of nuclear weapons, and development of atomic bombs gave the US and its allies a major advantage. By the 1950s, the Soviet Union had caught up and developed nuclear weapons. But space technology still had a fair way to go. The Soviet Union lacked fast-paced space technology, the Americans had some fast-paced, but not very advanced technology (. ) Although the Soviet Union had a head start, which didn’t help them in the end, nevertheless they impacted how the United States conducted their space exploration because they proved to be a challenging opposition, and pushed the American scientists to work to their ends.

The Office of Management and Budget, which outlines the White House’s plans for economic success, maintains that it “look[s] to scientific innovation to promote sustainable economic growth” (Zients and Holdren 1). NASA contributes to this notion by spending its budget on investments in and collaboration with other scientific institutions. It plays a part in each of the nine areas of science and technology (e.g. clean energy and advanced manufacturing) outlined in the Office of Management and Budget’s plan for economic prosperity (“NASA Socio-Economic Impacts” 9). Moreover, NASA participates in the development of 14 different technology types, from launch propulsion systems to nanotechnology (4). These involvements by NASA stimulate the economy in several ways. The administration encourages prosperity and innovativeness in other companies by contributing funds to their efforts. This, in turn, spurs competition in the technology marketplace, as more companies want to participate in NASA’s endeavors. Also, NASA’s participation in energy research guides the United States towards energy independence, which promotes a stable economy. This shows that the federal government’s funding of NASA is justified because the administration’s contributions to society and the economy are more valuable than the 0.5% of the federal budget that it

For many years, the United States has accomplished many great scientific and technological progress in air and space. NASA has been shown to be one of the leading representatives of these accomplishments and remains a leading force in the research and public interest of space exploration, as well as science and technology in general. More importantly, this exploration has given us a greater perspective of Earth, ourselves, and the universe. In order to thrive in these creations, steps must be taken in order to reach the point of discovery that launches us ahead of other countries. In all, funding on NASA space program by the United States should be raised to revolutionize technology, create major discoveries, prevent hazards in space, and

Exploration and innovation are an innate part of America today, yet some of the public during the early 1960s was opposed to joining the space race which lead America into a great technological era. After proposing a plan to Congress to increase the budget for space exploration, Harvard graduate and President John F. Kennedy addressed the American people from Rice University in Houston, Texas in 1962 to arouse support for the continuation of space exploration and increasing funding for NASA (Freidel and Sidey). In his revered speech, “We choose to go to the moon,” he ambitiously proclaimed the need for American exploration and the maintenance of leadership in all aspects of innovation. Kennedy reminds his audience space must be “used

Throughout America’s history, pioneers have ventured into the unknown. After the United States expanded to the Pacific Ocean, people invented machinery to travel into unknown areas. The inventions of Robert H. Goddard and others led to man’s discovery of space, (Launius 18-9). Roger D. Launius, NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) Chief Historian, recounts, “The combination of technological and scientific advance, the thrill of exploration, political competition with the Soviet Union, and changes in popular opinion about space flight came together in a very specific way in the 1950s to affect public policy in favor of an aggressive space program” (22). The United States had already spent $11.8 billion for space technology, but “the NSC determined that the cost of continuing the programs from 1957 to 1963 would be an additional $36 billion” so that the ICBM [intercontinental ballistic missile] capability would become a reality” (Launius 22). Every year, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration spends billions of dollars for its programs, which is money well spent.

From the beginning of the Space Race in 1957 between the United States and the Soviet Union until the 1980’s, space had been primarily utilized and explored by national governments and experienced very limited private commercial involvement. When the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 created the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), commercialized space was not seen at first as a viable industry. As the commercial space industry grew over the next decade, primarily in the form communications satellites, the regulations at the time fell behind.

Interstate commerce has enabled and developed economic opportunities for businesses for centuries. It wasn’t until the late 1800s where regulations came about that restricted certain activities, and of course, other laws and regulations that discussed taxation that multistate businesses would be affected with. For someone that has worked with these laws and regulations relating to the taxation of interstate commerce, I am excited to assist you in helping your strategy related to income tax filings, in addition to sales and use tax filings.

The world today revolves around technology and is in an ever upward spiraling path of new advancements. This path is now at what some people call the “final frontier”, or the space age. The discoveries being made on this front are overwhelming in comparison to the technology that the world had only twenty years ago. Space exploration was once left up to the governments, as they battled to be the first country in space, but with national debts raising and the cuts made in response, space exploration is beginning to become new grounds for private business owners. Private companies are already beginning to send off rockets at a fraction of the cost that government does, but if more money was put into the government space program, then they

Farrell, Pappalardo and Shelanski (2010) pointed out that the Bureau of Economics “BE” of the Federal Trade Commission “FTC” works to accomplish the missions of the FTC including the competition “antitrust” and consumer protection missions. Therefore, they focus on case-specific policy analysis and litigation support work for the consumer protection. Consequently, for example, the FTC continues to make rules to rescue mortgages and debt industries. Particularly these debts grew significantly during the financial crisis and the recession. Further, the agency works to improve and unify mortgage disclosures to support better consumer choice for these loan products (Farrell, Pappalardo & Shelanski (2010).

The Department of Commerce and Labor was established on February 14, 1903, during the presidential administration of Theodore Roosevelt. Less than ten years later it was divided into two separate entities, the Department of Commerce and the Department of Labor, each headed by a secretary (Shuman, R. B. (2016), U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC), Salem Press Encyclopedia). The secretary’s job was monitoring trades between the United States and other nations. An important mandate of the Department of Commerce is to promote America’s business and trade with other nations. The Department of Commerce went through several mission changes. Where it once was focused on international business and trading, it began to