Us Government Vs British Government Research Paper

By 1763 the American colonies developed a society different than the Mother Country due to religious, political, and economic differences. Religious toleration was established in the colonies whereas persecution was still occurring in England. In addition, the colonists extended concepts of liberty and self -government to a greater extent than the British did as well as developed an open social structure in which people could rise whereas England had well-defined, hereditary classes.

the United Kingdom country also known as Britain. it is called britain because the full name is. The United Kingdom of Britain and Northern Ireland The capital of the United Kingdom is London which is one of the worlds highest in in leading commercial financial and cultural centres. With the United Kingdom being most similar to sweden in many ways like the ethicists and their nation's fiscal feachers and even their mountain ranges from their valleys however they still have their differences like their wages the United Kingdom gets paid on average six point thirty one pounds an hour which is about nine dollars and forty seven cents And some of the major countries consist of Birmingham Liverpool and Manchester also with England and Belfast

The United States elects a president that is both head of state and head of government. In other democracies, the leader of the government is not both head of state and head of government. In the American form of democracy, there are only two major political parties, in other governments there may be multiple parties represented (IIP Digital, 2008). Our president, and other government officials are elected for a specific period of time, whereas other governments may call an election at any time (IIP Digital, 2008).

There were a myriad of differences between Great Britain and her American colonies in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, but these differences can be divided into three basic categories: economic, social, and political. The original American settlers came to the colonies for varied reasons, but a common trait among these settlers was that they still considered themselves British subjects. However, as time passed, the colonists grew disenfranchised from England. Separated from the king by three thousand miles and living in a primitive environment where obtaining simple necessities was a struggle, pragmatism became the common thread throughout all daily life in the colonies. It was this pragmatism that led the colonists to create

Under the British constitution, parliament is sovereign. This means, amongst other things, that Parliament has a monopoly on making and amending laws. The British constitution, and the three functions of government which operate it often falls short of creating a definitive separation. Separation of powers refers to the idea that the major institutions of government should function independent of each other, in a utopian world there should aim to be a balance between the Crown and Parliament. In practice however, separation between the executive and legislature is near enough non-existent, an example being that government is made up almost entirely of MPs. Contrast this with the USA where no member of Obama’s government is equally a member of congress. However, the USA does have a codified constitution, a constitution written to delegate a clear separation of power. As we are well aware the UK doesn’t have such a constitution, the rules that

I chose these two systems, which interest me for different reasons. The British system is one that has evolved over many centuries, with both small and large adjustments along the way to keep in on course. In contrast to this, the French model has changed dramatically on several occasions, and can rarely have been described as stable. However, in 1958 Charles de Gaulle made some brave changes to the constitution, which after being approved by the French public, set the scene for the classic semi-presidential system that we see today.

Though both are independent nations, the United Kingdom and the United States now share a close bond, and have even been allies during WWI and WWII in the 20th century. But when the colonies of the United States were under British rule, the relations between the Colonies and Britain were not so friendly. The views on government and taxation between the two became radically different and created a large disagreement between the American Patriots and those loyal to Britain. Cracks began to form in the relationship between Britain and the Colonies, and the differences between the two would inevitably result in the American Revolution.

From the start the colonies were never paid much attention by Great Britain. Great Britain had a policy of salutary neglect. This means that Great Britain would stay hands off of most colonial affairs as long as the colonies paid and obeyed trade and tax laws. Great Britain believed as long as they minded their own business the colonies would stay in line. If not for this neglect many of the core principles the U.S. was founded on would not have been created. One of these is the legislative assembly in which every man is in some way represented and that assembly sets and follows its own laws. The other is the religious freedom formed from this neglect causing the colonists and Britains to become very different kinds of people. This policy did

Modern British democracy is similar to Greek democracy since in both instances, the people have a voice in political decisions. However, in Britain, the people vote for officials to make decisions for them, and everyone has a right to vote, but in Greece, free men (20% of the population) directly made decisions. Greek democracy also relied on slavery so people could have enough time to participate.

In colonial America, democracy was a work in progress with both undemocratic and democratic features, for democracy was just beginning to form in this early country. Our past government was based on democracy,but colonist were only just starting to understand the concept of this, resulting in plenty democratic and undemocratic features.

British has influenced the structure of the United States dramatically. Even from the simple preference for coffee over tea to having a President over a Monarch. The United States and Britain share a love-hate relationship that has extended over the years and has been strengthened by the common enemies and alliance. However, when America set out on the journey to becoming a nation of their own they decided that Great Britain was no role model. America refused to follow the monarchy Britain established and their nation must be by the people for the people. America had multiple ideas of how their nation should be, but their fear consumed them. The stumbled but eventually produced the Constitution that demonstrated all the hate from British experience and their attempt to not reproduce it.

Although both countries have not undergone any major revolutions or major changes in government, the Glorious Revolution of 1688 in England did slightly change the way of their government. In this historical event, William of Orange took the throne from James II, giving the Parliament more power to create a balanced monarchy. Before, people felt as though the monarchy had all the power, and Parliament did not have enough. Until today, this way of government has taken effect.

The Monarchies of Russia and England were alike but very different at the same time. They did some things the same and others very different. Their Monarchies were made up of many things. The similarities between Russia and England were their Parliament which they both had and both worked very well.

The monarch is a figure head and does no decision making. The voters of a parliamentary system elect parliament who then elect the prime minister and the cabinet. The prime minister is normally the leader of the most popular party in parliament. The PM even being the head of government is not as powerful as the head of government in a presidential system. The parliament of the system withholds the most power. They make or break any law. Compared to the separation of powers as in a presidential system there is only a separation of functions. Each part of government has its own function to perform, but there is no system of checks and balances. An example of the overlapping of powers is the need of a vote of confidence. A vote of confidence is proposed by a party and needs backing from the other part of government. With no system of sorts there is more likely of upheaval and change of rule. There is not as much stability in a parliamentary system as there is in a presidential. Lastly there is no judicial rule as there is in a presidential system. A parliamentary system has had success in the past but still is seen as not as successful as a presidential system.

Parliamentary democracy is the type of government where the public vote government into power and parliamentarians are representative of the people. While a Presidential Democracy is when there is a system of government that has a president acting as the nation’s head of state and active chief executive authority. The similarities between the Presidential and Parliamentary model are: both are representative democracies, both have a head of state, both have a bicameral form of gover