Usher Movie Vs Book

I think the movie is better than the book because it’s more visual, has more action, and has props.

The Book King Arthur is better than the movie version. First, there is a lot of missing scene in the movie. Second, it have some unquestionable scene and sexual activity. Last reason is that there is lack of character and information and it like a different version.. So I will talk about why the Book King Arthur is so much better than the movie version.

I didn’t pick the book over the movie because I think books are boring. When you are watching the movie you don’t have to use your brain that much. When I’m watching a movie about any type of genre that has a book that goes with it, I usually ask questions to myself (in my head) about

The book is better because it gives more excitement and emotion. The book just explains each of the events in great detail. I don’t know about other people, but for me the more information there is, the more I understand it. And in the movie of “The Outsiders”, it does not really say much about what’s going on. For instance, when Johnny dies, in the movie, Ponyboy goes home but it does not tell how long he had been out. In the book, Pony is walking home from the hospital and a man asked him if he wanted a ride (Hinton 151). Though others might think that the movie is better because it visualizes the events that are happening. But, even though it envisions what the book tells about does not mean that it is one hundred percent better.

The difference between the developing way of books and movies is magnificently huge because the way of emotion transmitting is different; the movie is based on vision, while the book is based on words.

For instance, the book talks about how the greasers felt and how their feelings were, then in the movie, it didnt talk about it but it showed it. The way that they showed it was not as good as it was written. When reading we don't fall in love with the characters' appearance. We fall in love with their words, their thoughts, and their hearts. We fall in love with their soul. In movies we focus more on appearance and what's going on in the background, which then gets people distracted from what the character is feeling and their thoughts. On the other hand, you can see the actions of the characters in the movie, which might help you process the way they act, however with the book the author can use what he thinks and try to give people a general idea of everything. For an example in the book it talks about how Randy

There are two different versions to “the outsiders” a book by S.E Hinton there are many differences between the book and the movie in my opinion the book is better because it shows more detail and will always go that extra mile to have every little detail,and the book is more realistic but the movie is really good even though it cuts many parts that the book still has

The film is better because rather than a book, which most people would rather to read, they are more likely to watch a film that turns up on T.V. Most people don’t pick up a book after high school but a film is something that people frequently watch. In addition to the massive range of the film, it, unlike the book, is presented with audio cues and visual images that the book lacks. Individuals, who don’t have the time or patience to read a book that is only words, can watch an animated and indulging film that diffuses the same message as the book and perhaps, even more because of all the characters that come to play in the

“Books are better than movies because you design the set the way you want it to look.” This quote comes from Trent Reznor and some may agree and some may disagree. When reading a written version , the reader can visualize characters in their own way with context clues from the book. In movies, the viewer sees the characters the way the director wants to portray them.

What draws people into reading a book or watching a movie? Although they have many differences, there are similarities that cannot be overlooked. The science fiction book titled Ender’s Game by Orson Scott Card was adapted into a movie that received mixed reviews concerning the justification of the book. Ender Wiggins, a genius, and a nobody on Earth, was the project of higher-ups in the world government. He was to be the next Commander of the Fleet that would destroy the Formic species in the Third Invasion. First, the character development in the movie had big differences to the book although the big picture was hardly altered. Next, the plot of the movie was altered from the book in a way that would grab an audience's attention in theater,

In addition it got confusing on who was talking. Also, it showed more than the book did. The movie was easier to see who was talking. Therefore the movie showed more than the book by the different points of view that were shown. Those are the reasons why I think the movie is better than the

Books give you the opportunity to let your mind make up the pictures about the story, based on how you want. It allows your mind to think outside the box and use your imagination. In a movie or show, the television shows the picture for you, without having to think or question why it is that way. Books also give the reader more details and information about the story, while movies just show it the way they think it should be. Lots of people claim that when you read a book and watch a movie over the same topic, the movie is always better. In that case, you should open a book and dive into your own

In my sixteen years of living, throughout my life, I’ve mostly been told that that the book is better than the movie. From Harry Potter to the Hunger Games, most readers tend to feel that the book is able to capture more. More description, more development, more dynamic, they would say, just to name a few. Now I’d never really fallen into that presumption, as I prefer to give each book and movie separate chances and never truly compare the two. Until I read It’s Kind of a Funny Story.

To study the slavery by 12 Years a Slave, which is a memoir of Solomon Northup, the book and the film version are great sources, so, which one is better for learning? We cannot deny that watching the movie 12 Years a Slave is way more readily than reading the whole book, because it portray in pictures and sounds, gives a clear image to audiences. Reading a book can have more imaginations, but a memoir does not need that much imagination since it purposes to tell a period of history. Therefore, if students did not read the book carefully, some historical details will missed and student , and it against the purpose of reading the book – study the history with details. Thus, watching the movie is much more readily. Does the movie portray the same

When a person reads a book they are entranced in the plot line. They have to comprehend and understand in order to finish the book and have it make sense. Movies can just be idly watched without gaining attention or intellect. Due to this, movies do not leave an impression.