Utilitarian Vs. Deontological Viewpoint

In the common health and social care system, the workers have ethical guidelines that they have to follow. The common ethical considerations include the equality tenet. According to this tenet, all the patients in the healthcare facility have to be accorded treatment and care regardless of their faith. The patient is a patient regardless of the race and social affiliation. The other ethical consideration is the right that the patients have to emergency treatment regardless of the reservations that they have concerning the cause of the emergency or the

Utilitarianism and Deontology are two very different ethical theories that have very little in common. They are similar in the sense that they share the same focus which is to determine which human actions are right and acceptable versus the actions that are wrong hence unacceptable. Beyond the primary focus of which actions are right or wrong, there seem to be no similarities. This is because both theories have different approaches to determine what is good and what is bad. Despite the fact that both theories have pros and cons, Utilitarianism seems to be the better moral theory.

Utilitarianism is normative ethical theory from a school of thought that believes we must guide our actions always by the consequences that can from follow them. Utilitarian’s believe we ought to implement the actions that bring the most overall happiness. Deontologists believe in an ethical theory that is guided by maxims, which means the action you choose must be applied to all scenarios, for example even if lying is the best option in one particular situation, in most regular situations lying will cause more damage so we must follow that as a principle all the time. I’m going to go in depth on how both a Utilitarian and Deontologist would rationalize their duties to be charitable to the less fortunate and argue that

The ethical theories of deontology and the branches of utilitarianism; act and rule, display similarities and differences within the meanings of both. Act utilitarianism theory is the focus on the outcome of an act. Rule utilitarianism is the method of an individual’s actions. The theories of deontology and utilitarianism both present moral rules and values. Deontology focuses on the motives of an action, whereas utilitarianism centers more on the end result. The Act utilitarianism theory is more effective by judging the morality of an action based on the consequences of its outcome.

The utilitarian philosophy is an ethical philosophy in which the overall societal health/ well-being is considered of great importance. According to this philosophy, an action is morally justifiable if its consequences are overall beneficial. For example, flu shots protect the general population from a widespread infection from the influenza virus. At Northwell Health it is suggested that flu shots be obtained by all employees to prevent spreading the virus, especially in the provider to patient settings such as hospitals. Flu shots are conveniently offered at each Northwell Health location at no cost to the employee; those that opt out of getting a flu shot must wear a protective mask when interacting with patients. Another example of the

Utilitarianism and Deontology are challenged in Watchmen, Adrian and Rorschach are both opposites of each other, as you can see during the film. Killing millions of innocents to save billions and maintain peace, while Rorschach believes in punishing the bad NOT the innocent. The Watchmen contains lots of violence regarding the usage of Utilitarianism and Deontology. Rorschach uses his strict rule of being moral. He will not and never change the way he views the city he lives in. He will always do the right thing. Which in this case is eliminating all evil from this corrupt city. Adrian uses Utilitarianism to act. He chooses the act that will bring more happenins and reduce the violence in the world

Utilitarianism and deontological theories have been known to be critical the organizational transformation of law enforcement. These theories or ethical perspectives help law enforcement officers to; identify and define problems, forces them to think systematically, encourages them to view issues through many different points or positions, and provides them white decision-making guidelines. Therefore, utilitarian and deontological ideological theories help guide law enforcement’s behavior and practices by making morally and ethical decisions, particularly when officers are being faced with ethical dilemmas.

Deontology is a famous meta-ethical theory practiced among famous philosophers such as Immanuel Kant, W.D. Ross, Sissela Bok, and many other philosophers and influential we know. Deontology is focused on “duty” based actions. The entire theory is focused on the duty of people and how they submit to the duty that they have. It is simply defined as, duty is the basis of morality. It is also focuses around looking at the consequential effects of a particular action that is done. Because of the belief system of deontologists, I strongly believe that deontology attains the strongest and most easily defendable argument of all the meta-ethical theories. Opposing, utilitarianism is the belief system that morality is doing what will bring happiness to the most people. Amongst all the meta-ethical theories, utilitarianism has to have the weakest argument, because by having mindset is not exactly how society can reasonably function.

Concerning the medicinal field, ethics gives the chance for caregivers to make proper and legal choices for their patients. For example, how clinicians ought to treat patients in troublesome circumstances? What thought process do caregivers consider in order to give better treatment to their patients? There are four essential standards to consider while evaluating the morals of a study: beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy and paternalism. Based on these moral guidelines, the point of these moral standards is to help control the caregivers give out the best decisions and keep away from mischief while tending to their patients. In addition, each moral rule contains particular elucidation and can be drawn nearer to diverse circumstances. Thusly, the motivation behind this paper is to depict and clarify significant components of moral hypotheses, its fundamental focuses, how it is utilized as a part of the decision making, and how it crosses with the therapeutic field values.

This case study is regarding the evaluation of ethical and legal rights, responsibilities, duties of those engaged in the medical profession. The case study deals with highlighting the relationship between the patient and doctor, and as a doctor his ethical responsibilities towards the patient which shall be discussed in detail.

The health care or medical ethics can be defined as a set of ethical principles, opinions and standards that guide us in making choices about therapeutic care. Whenever an ethical issue or problem arises in patient care, it needs to be handled in an ethical way because it deals with the sensitive issues related to the suffering patients and their caretakers. This kind of qualitative research offers solutions to understand the problems faced by the providers and their executives. The objective of this survey is to acquire facts on the ethical difficulties and contentment acknowledged by the health care workers in patient care.

Gaining a better understanding of ethics may assist in generating a better understanding of various viewpoints on ethics, values and inter professionalism in the health care setup. My understanding of these issues affects my own personal values, ethics and sense of inter professionalism which shapes how I interpret analyze and communicate legal and ethical issues. A clear understanding of these issues is, therefore, important to ensure that my interpretation analysis and communication of ethical and legal issues is accurate. Understanding these issues will ensure that I respect the patient’s rights. The rights of the patient includes the right to receive the organizations patients bill rights, the right to know about their rights, the right to know the hospital adverse effects and the right to access their medical records (Pozgar, 2012).

‘What is moral is what you feel good after, and what is immoral is what you feel bad after’ . Morality, so easily described by Hemingway, has been the focus of many philosophical theories. Generally speaking, theories of morality try to determine what is right and what is wrong or what is good and what is bad. In this essay, it will be argued that a universal theory of morality could not exist by comparing the two theories of utilitarianism and deontology.

Ethical decision making concerning in nursing practice environment. Many a time nurse practitioners find themselves in ethical dilemmas about what to do in certain situations and tend to follow their instincts as the best course of action to pursue, and this could help to either solve the problematic issue or land them into problems. I tend to think this is the main reason why the nurses’ code of ethics was developed to act as a guide during such difficult situations. There are four ethical principles that must be put into consideration by nurse practitioners while offering care for patients. They include the following: respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice (Beauchamp & Childress, 2013). The principle of autonomy sometimes is described as respect for autonomy (Beauchamp & Childress, 2013). Respect for autonomy is one of the guiding principles of ethics where the nurse practitioner expected to explain the care plan that he or she intends to offer to the patient and give the patient a chance to decide for himself/herself on what he/she thinks will work best. This is also known as a right to self-determination, and the patient is given this chance after all critical information is availed to him or her (Aitamaa & Kilpi, 2015).

My future profession is specialist of health care and these topics are important when arranging health care productively, economically and according ethical principals. Task of ethics is to help to make right decisions when guiding and evaluating activities. Ethics don´t give right answers to questions but it can help in decision and policy-making by giving fundamentals to consider with values, ideals and principals. (Etene – julkaisuja 1, 2001.)