Utilitarian Vs Singer

Decent Essays
Both essays have moral argument that Animals has the same rights and equal to humans. As human we should give equal privileges to animals and fight for their rights. Peter Singer’s argument is ” that the pain and pleasure of animals as well as that of humans must be included in utilitarian calculations” (pg. 504) the author used utilitarian to show humans to pay attention rights of other living such animals. No doubt that Animals go through the same pain and suffer like humans, at the same time do not get the same treatment. I think killing and murdering animals is morally wrong. Therefore, we should assess the animal feelings before hunting them for food. For instance, hunting a deer that delivered a newborn, and leaving the young alone
Get Access