Utilitarianism: What Makes A Good Job?

Utilitarianism is the ethical belief that the happiness of the greatest number of people is the greatest good. Jeremy Betham and John Stuart Mill are two philosophers that were leading advocates for the utilitarianism that we study today. In order to understand the basis of utilitarianism, one must know what happiness is. John Stuart Mill defines happiness as the intended pleasure and absence of pain while unhappiness is pain and the privation of pleasure. Utilitarians feel the moral obligation to maximize pleasure for not only themselves, but for as many people as possible. All actions can be determined as right or wrong based on if they produce the maximum amount of happiness. The utilitarian belief that all actions can be determined as right or wrong based only on their repercussions connects utilitarianism to consequentialism. Consequentialism is the belief that an action can be determined morally right or wrong based on its consequences. Just like any other belief system, utilitarianism faces immense amount of praise and criticism.

Workers may need validation or appreciation, a sense of belonging, feelings of accomplishment or achievement, or respect or power. Jobs that provide these determinants or values in the quantities that the individual needs are good jobs in that the worker is going to be happy. Jobs that provide most of these determinants may still be unhappy jobs because the job may be missing that one value that a specific individual needs most. The same job is seen differently by two different people because the values of the individual are the most important determinants of whether or not the job is a happy one.

(6)You should not kill an innocent (friendless but healthy) person EVEN IF by doing so (and giving his organs to several others) you could increase net happiness.

For utilitarian philosophers, happiness is the supreme value of life. John Stuart Mill defines Utilitarianism as a theory based on the principle that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain and privation of pleasure” (Mill, Utilitarianism). This meaning that utilitarianism is determined by the calculation of happiness, in which actions are deemed to be good if they tend to produce pleasure, a form of happiness. On the contrary, they are evil if they tend to promote pain. Not only does Mill regard to the end product of happiness in actions, but also considers the motives of such actions. In his argument, Mill defends the idea that happiness as the underlying basis of morality, and that people desire nothing but happiness.

Utilitarian views are based on the production of happiness, pleasure, and utility. Our actions as human beings are judged as right or wrong. Moral actions in society produce pleasure and immoral actions produce pain. Utilitarianism focuses on actions that should be taken for a society not for just one person. The whole idea is to maximize happiness, do what will produce more pleasure for all and not what will bring pain for all. The Katian perspective focuses on universal rights, not just on a community as a whole but also on an individual. Honesty is very important because it is morally right. Doing something just because it produces a lot of pleasure to many people does not mean that it is right. Katian views goes against Utilitarian views because Kant does not believe that pleasure and happiness of all should go over an individual. Just because there is a majority in favor of a rule does not make it fair for all. According to utilitarianism it is unjust for the government to lie about matters of foreign and military policy because you are supposed to maximize the benefits for the community as a whole to produce happiness. In the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution we see that there is a maximizing of benefits but for the government officials and president not the people. The government is only focused on themselves and not on the people who should be their main focus and priority. Before taking any action the government should evaluate all of the possible actions and the

Mylan should provide 50 percent off coupons to customers. By applying Utilitarianism approach to the second, our solution is ethical, because it helps thousands of patients and only hurts shareholders because of a lower return for their investments.

Utilitarianism is a moral theory that has long been the subject of philosophical debate. This theory, when practiced, appears to set a very basic guideline to follow when one is faced with a moral dilemma. Fundamental Utilitarianism states that when a moral dilemma arises, one should take action that causes favorable results or reduces less favorable results. If these less favorable results, or pain, occur from this action, it can be justified if it is produced to prevent more pain or produce happiness. Stating the Utilitarian view can summarize these basic principles: "the greatest good for the greatest number". Utilitarians are to believe that if they follow this philosophy, that no matter what action they take, it

Utilitarianism: “The idea that an action is right, as long as it promotes happiness, and that the greatest happiness of the greatest number should be the guiding principle of conduct (Oxford Dictionaries).” This theory was thought up as far back as the 17th century, but didn’t become well known until late into the 18th century when Jeremy Bentham a legal and social reformer gave a powerful presentation of the idea. “Create all the happiness you are able to create; remove all the misery you are able to remove. Every day will allow you, will invite you to add something to the pleasure of others, or to diminish something of their pains (Jeremey Bentham).” Deontology: “An ethical theory that the morality of an action should be based on whether

Utilitarianism is the ethical ideology of the most recent of these philosophers, John Stuart Mill (1806-1873). The primary goal is to obtaining what is best for the overall good; it looks to the end the point, the consequences “for the general and overall good” (DesJardins, 2014, p.31), rather than how one reaches that point. Mill believes that being able to determine and maximize the preferable consequences for the greatest number of people is based on “empirical observation” and the subsequent reasoning based on this observation; therefore inductive reasoning. Modern day politics tends to reflect this type of ethical principle.

What is the perfect job? For everyone, the perfect job is different. Some people like animals,some like science, and don’t get me started on cars. For me, the perfect job would be a veterinarian.

Being stuck on the mountain surrounded by more than 80 taliban that want to kill you. Then having three goat herders come out of nowhere. So now I stuck in a country where i am seen as the white devil and more than half of the people of this country are trying to kill me. While I am on the ground seeing that my group is out number, and in the corner of my eye i see the goat herder getting closer and closer. Then with noticing they were right in front of us, as soon i was about to talk they started screaming and running back. Running down the hill taking the them down, we noticed one of them dropped a radio. A freaking radio that might be used to contact the people who are trying to kill us. Now I have the deciding vote to let them go or kill them cold blooded to save our own lives.

What would I do if I in Ms. Marsh’s shoes to help out with an 17-year-old Ben’s grade from C to B. Before I make decide and I will explain about profession positions.

Utilitarianism is a limiting ethical theory that fails to grasp ethically reality. “The greatest good for the greatest number” is not ethically right in every situation. Although the majority would benefit, the minority will heavily suffer. Considering the overall consequences of our actions, the good may not always outweigh the bad, but this does mean that the good will be the ethically right thing to do. One may think they are “maximizing the overall good,” but in reality, harming many.

Utilitarianism has surrounded the view of happiness and ways to endorse it. The thought here is that all individuals look for joy, which is the objective of all individuals. At the point when an individual act is decent, he or she should attempt to achieve the best conceivable measure of happiness which is known as "the greatest happiness principle." An individual must continuously deliver happiness, to decrease unhappiness. The theory is entirely centered around the result of an individual's actions; it is classed as a theory that worries about outcomes rather than activities.

In his book, J.S. Mill attempts to build on Jeremy Bentham's original idea of Utilitarianism. His definition of the moral theory is one that is grounded in Bentham's original work but also extends to include remarks to criticisms of Utilitarianism.