Utilizing and Exploiting Intellectual Property Laws

Layout a emblem all of your very own! Trademarks are not simplest for foremost companies. Common traffic to your website online will start to apprehend your emblem, and accept as true with the symbol. A emblem is tremendous to apply for all sorts of

In this paper, we evaluate the various applications of Australian Intellectual Property (IP) law. Special attention is given in its application in the performance of copyrighted songs in private commercial facilities, registration of new designs as well as patent ownership while in contractual employment.

Roald Dahl’s well-known children’s book, Charlie & the Chocolate Factory, depicted a talented inventor of candy known as Willy Wonka. The talented inventor’s creations were constantly under seize by his competitors, specifically Mr. Slugworth, Mr. Fickelgruber, and Mr. Prodnose. Wonka went to extreme measures to ensure his trade secrets, creations, and technologies were kept safe from his competitors. The amount of effort put into protecting his secrets was incredibly overworked. The challenges Willy Wonka faced in protecting his secrets are literary example of the real world obstacles inventors face with their creations. In today’s technological

One reason is for inventors and corporations to have an advantage over another company. The products and ideas need to be protected from duplication from competing businesses and inventors (GIPC, 2009). Intellectual property motivates economic growth and creates competitiveness in people and business (GIPC, 2009). In this day and age people are always looking for the next best thing and if anyone was able to create the identical item as another company then there would be a rush to market on many items that are the same and there would be less need for protection. In reality this can also create jobs and grow a local community that recently fell on hard times (GIPC, 2009). The protection of intellectual property rights help purchasers in making well-rounded and knowledgeable decisions on the products safety, reliability, and effectiveness of their purchases (GIPC,

Intellectual property is very important as American business continues to expand and develops. Businesses are now attempting to penetrate foreign markets which are unique in their laws, customers and beliefs. As such, it is important for business to protect the intellectual capital that made their operations thrive and flourish. It is the nature of capitalism to copy or mimic successful products. It is when companies outright copy a trademark or patented process that complications arise. Intellectual property is no different in this regard. China specifically, has been notorious for infringing on American companies intellectual capital. WIPO defines refers to counterfeiting as "infringement on trademarks," and piracy as "infringement on copyright or related acts (Jacobson, 2008)." 5 to 7 percent of all world trade is comprised of piracy and counterfeiting. Piracy rates within China were at an alarming 92% ( Cheng, 2011).Nearly 1.3 Billion people now live in China, of which approximately 90% of them pirate software or commit other versions of cybercrime against intellectual property. The likelihood of actually getting caught for this offense is unlikely due in part to the sheer volume of citizens within the country. Would it be practical or even worthwhile to catch every small business counterfeiter within China? If so, what is to prevent another person from committing the same offense? With the ease of access to technology, I believe that literally any one of the 1.3

The value of intellectual property is something that can be debated among the rack and file members of any industry, but the measures created to protect IP of all shapes and sizes has been affected in preventing companies from establishing intellectual property that would benefit the organization. The basis of this response paper is to address the value of intellectual property for the Wendy’s company, throughout the paper the writer will answer vital questions regarding IP and Wendy’s. Intellectual capital is the intellectual property used by an organization to generate revenue for the organization. Companies such as Wendy’s depend on the intellectual property to separate themselves from the pack of competition within their industry. “The success of our business strategy depends, in part, on our continued ability to use our existing trademarks and service marks in order to increase brand awareness and further develop our branded products

Logos belong in their own category of IP, where there is a grey area of what means of protection is necessary, somewhere between copyright and trademark. Businesses are known to use both to protect such logos. Companies that provide services for logos, branding, and merchandising from a third party standard often feel the ramifications of misusing their customer’s logos for their own marketing purposes. Copyright and trademark infringement are among the most common types of marketing misuse. There is often confusion between using protections with copyrights versus trademarks. A copyright protects an original work of authorship fixed in a tangible medium of expression. However, a trademark protects sources, including words, symbols, smells, pictures, and sounds, that are used to identify the source of goods and distinguish them from goods sold by others (Harazin 2012).

Copyright laws were established to provide authors with rights over their creations and to prevent unauthorized use and distribution of these creations by others. Although the law grants ownership to one party, usually the author of the work, there is a doctrine for granting ownership of “work-made-for-hire” to educational institutions (Crews, 2006). This doctrine supports that if the employee developed the work under the parameters of their scope of employment or through the use of resources provided by the employer, then the employer owns the rights to the work (Crews, 2006). In an effort to clarify the mandates of copyright law and improve understanding of intellectual property ownership, educational institutions have developed their own policies addressing intellectual property ownership. The policies vary by institution, but share the same purpose of providing guidelines and conditions for ownership of creations by the educational institution’s faculty.

Copyright was incorporated to promote advancement of knowledge and to protect the right of the inventor, yet the law’s interpretation to the present society is doing the exact opposite. Intellectual Property consists of two systems in protecting your ideas and inventions, copyrights and patents. Patents are usually used for creators or inventions while copyright is more of expression or ideas like music, movies, etc. The intellectual property, copyright and patents placed in nowadays are causing a big issue and are not doing the original laws justice. The first amendment prohibits abridging the freedom of speech (1st Amendment Bill of Rights). Based on what the first amendment allows us to do, individual should not be prevented from exercising that right. Intellectual property, copyright and patents are causing the very problems they were created to prevent. Companies are misusing these rights for their own economic advancement. Kembrew Mcleod made similar arguments in his piece, Freedom of Expression: Overzealous Copyright Bozos and Other Enemies of Creativity. There has to be middle ground within these laws so that issues do not arise.

Patent violations among high-tech companies have increasingly become popular in this industry, as fact that is not common in other industries. This happens mainly because there is something inherent within the industry that is certainly common among many high-tech firms. As such, these companies keep suing one another alluding this to patent violations. The key drive of the industry is technological innovations and every firm in the industry is battling to remain feasible in the industry and outdo its competitors by staying ahead in terms of coming up with new ideas and materializing theme into adorable features that are incorporated in many electronic gadgets. According to Comino and Manenti (2014), ideas among high-tech companies are

Traditional heraldry and contemporary corporate visual identity (CVI) are the two systems that communicate the idea of identification. Identification is not only for modern world, as far back as during medieval ages, identification already started in the form of heraldry. Traditional heraldry uses different design approach but mainly is to communicate identity. Even though both identity systems exist in two different eras, they share the similar purpose, which is mainly to identify. Moreover, designs and symbolism also play an important role on identification. For example, the McDonald’s Golden Arches logo (Figure 1), which resembles an “M” for “McDonald’s”, is a famous logo that can be easily recognized.

Regarding regulatory concerns for instance, the fundamental self-reproducing nature of transgenic substances, particularly seeds, makes it rather difficult for traditional intellectual property rights to efficiently protect the proprietary interests of inventors and investors within the agricultural biotechnology space. Thus, the need for suitable protection and appropriation systems for new technologies, remains a principal challenge to sustaining rapid advances in biotechnology (Oguamanam, 2005).

Description of cultural attitudes towards and presumption about whether a person can own words and knowledge. Indicate if modern trends such as globalization and easy access to information affected these and give consideration as to whether are also applicable in an organization. Also indicate if the presumptions hold true in ones career as an employee of the organization and how may this essay be relevant to ones work.

In order for the Bell’s to maintain that they have the right to exploit the taken photo by submitting it into a competition, it must be proven that they hold ownership of the copyright and the work is protected as such. In order to discuss authorship and ownership, the subject matter of protection must be established. In the United Kingdom, there is a closed list of 8 copyright protectable forms of media found in the Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988 (CDPA) , of which Section 4 is the most applicable. Specifically, a photograph is protected under s 4(1)(a), but is dependent on the s 1(1)(a) requirement that the photograph be original.

There has been debates on the meaning of corporate identity, to name a few, seven schools of thought on corporate identity (Balmer, 1995), three perspectives on the meaning of corporate identity (van Riel & Balmer, 1997) and so on. Although there is difference, those meanings on corporate identity share some similarities, namely visual elements, behaviors and communications. In van Riel and Balmer’s (1997) graphic design paradigm, visuals are used to convey messages about the corporate mission, vision, philosophy and so on to various stakeholders. Visuals can be the corporate logo, its font types, its slogans, etc. which will be diffused in print ads, video ads, brochures, presentations, annual reports… As mentioned earlier, symbolism has a semantic interpretation—symbols/signifiers and their signified. Here, symbols are used interchangeably with logo or the brand name. The symbols serve as a representation of the brand and the design of symbols is infused with brand identity and symbolic meanings of the brand. Given that customers make their purchase decision without actually receiving any tangible service in service brands, symbols are often used as surrogate “evaluation variables” (Hansen, 1972).