preview

VALUE AND RISK MANAGEMENT PROTOCOL FOR DYNAMIC BRIEF DEVELOPMENT IN CONSTRUCTION

Better Essays

Emirates Journal for Engineering Research, 10 (2), 23-36 (2005)
(Regular Paper)

VALUE AND RISK MANAGEMENT PROTOCOL FOR DYNAMIC
BRIEF DEVELOPMENT IN CONSTRUCTION
A.A.E. OTHMAN
Department of Social Services and Commercial Buildings, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates aothman@emirates.net.ae (Received August 2005 and accepted November 2005)

‫اﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺎت اﻟﺤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ اﺳﺘﺨﻼص ﻣﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎت اﻟﻤﺸﺮوع ﺗﺤﺪد ﺗﻄﻮﻳﺮ هﺬﻩ اﻟﻤﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎت اﻟﻲ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ. هﺬا اﻟﻤﻨﻈﻮر‬
.‫ﻳﻌﻮق اﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﺑﻴﻦ اﻟﻤﺎﻟﻚ و اﻟﻤﺼﻤﻢ، آﻤﺎ ﻳﻤﻨﻊ اﻻﺳﺘﻔﺎدة ﻣﻦ ﻓﺮص اﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ اﻟﺘﻲ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺆدي اﻟﻲ ﺗﺤﺴﻴﻦ أداء اﻟﻤﺸﺮوع‬
‫ﻣﺒﺪأ اﻟﺘﻄﻮﻳﺮ اﻟﺪﻳﻨﺎﻣﻴﻜﻲ ﻟﻤﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎت اﻟﻤﺸﺮوع ﺗﻢ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﻤﻪ آﻤﺪﺧﻞ ﻟﻠﺘﻐﻠﺐ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻗﺼﻮر اﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺎت اﻟﺤﺎﻟﻴﺔ. هﺬا اﻟﻤﺒﺪأ ﻳﺪﻋﻢ‬
‫و ﻳﺸﺠﻊ ﺗﻄﻮﻳﺮهﺬﻩ اﻟﻤﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎت ﻃﻮال دورة ﺣﻴﺎة اﻟﻤﺸﺮوع ﻣﻦ أﺟﻞ اﻟﻮﺻﻮل اﻟﻲ رﺿﺎء اﻟﻤﺎﻟﻚ …show more content…

This is attributed to the limitations of the current briefing approaches, which confine the development of the

23

A.A.E. Othman

project brief to a certain stage. This perspective hinders the interaction between the client and the designer and impedes exploiting value opportunities and managing risk threats caused by brief development drivers. In order to overcome the limitations of the current briefing approaches, the
Dynamic Brief Development (DBD) concept was developed. This concept supports and encourages brief development throughout the project life cycle as an approach to achieve client satisfaction and respond in an innovative manner to the brief development drivers, improve the briefing process, and to manage change orders effectively [6].
Permitting brief development to take place without establishing the procedures that control its development leaves the project brief uncontrolled and jeopardise achieving client’s satisfaction. Because brief development can add value or risk to the project or could add both, the well-established methodologies of Value Management (VM) and Risk Management
(RM) are the most appropriate tools to manage dynamic brief development. Since better value could not be achieved unless associated risks have been managed, both methodologies

Get Access