Vaccines: Article Analysis

Nonetheless, due to the new social media sites spreading and intensifying the already established decades of perceived negative health effects and widespread misinformation, the overall conversation regarding the issue has only continued to grow, and vaccines are still scrutinized greatly within public contention. With these new social media sites, a new kind of panic has grown, as Mark Largent, a professor at Michigan State University, addresses these issues in his novel, “Keep Out of Reach of Children.” He recognizes in his work that a part of the main arguments against vaccines are due to religious or philosophical reasons, or that they are unsafe. Parents argue that vaccines could potentially cause autism, other health defects, and could lead to the harm for their children (Navin). However, he quickly rejects the idea and

The issue of vaccines was addressed in an opinion article by Claire Harvey titled Anti-vaxers, you are baby killers published on the 22nd of March 2015. Appealing to parents who are outraged by the anti-vaccine parents, the writer contends, in an angry tone, that parents who don't vaccinate their children are irresponsible and should be labelled as 'baby killers'. Keeping her target audience in mind, Harvey manages to persuade readers about the importance of vaccinating babies and making sure that others do as well by using inclusive language and evidence. Her vocab choice and use of loaded language also helps support her argument.

Controversy over mandatory vaccination has become a highly debated topic in our society. Andrew Wakefield is known for starting the “anti-vaccination group”. In 1998, he published a study stating that vaccines had an association with increasing rates of autism. It was eventually proven that he falsely recorded data to support his theory and he lost his medical license as a result (Andrew, 2016). Even with his data being proven false, many parents are still worried and scared of vaccinating their children. Several studies since then have not been able to find any association with vaccines and increasing rates of autism, further proving his study was falsified. With factual studies and their results, I believe better educating parents about the facts of vaccination and eliminating vaccination exemptions based on personal beliefs woud be the most beneficial resolution to his debate.

In the 1990s, an article was released in The Lancet by Andrew Wakefield. He composed a study of the effects of the Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccines on children. The study suggested that the MMR vaccine can be linked to causing autism or personality disorders. The published study sparked controversy, and stopped families from taking their children to get vaccinated out of fear. Scientists and doctors quickly disproved Wakefield’s findings, claiming his work was inaccurate and fraudulent (Mnookin, 2011). However, parents continue to distrust vaccines and spread the inaccurate information about autism around to other parents who are unsure what to think about vaccines.

This topic is extremely significant to my audience because a growing number of parents do not vaccinate their children due to fear of side effects. Parents today have lost confidence in in the vaccination industry as a consequence of sensationalism brought about by false evidence published and the celebrities that latched onto that claim. Sadly, some people have taken to considering the strong opinions and may not research vaccinations before making decisions

Vaccines have in recent years become quite a controversial subject. Parents who are trying to decide whether to vaccinate their children find themselves bombarded with information some of it valid, and reliable, but a lot of it false or heavily biased. They find horror stories of infants and children who have seizures and/or permanent brain damage as a result of a vaccine. Sources that support immunization refuse to acknowledge the dangers of the vaccines & those that don’t often fail to reveal the rarity of extreme negative reactions, or acknowledge the true dangers of the diseases the vaccines protect against. It is nearly impossible to find a reliable source that accurately

“We want to believe we are invincible and that nothing can touch our children. We have access to the best medical care. Many of the deadly diseases that swept through communities have now been eradicated due to vaccination.” This quotation was written by a woman named Linda Anderson. When her son was only a few months old, he did of a vaccine-preventable disease. If you were to ask her, she would implore you to vaccinate her children. She suffered a loss that no parent should ever have to endure. Parents should be required by law to vaccinate their children because the argument against it (regarding autism) is invalid, they keep children from getting and spreading preventable, and sometimes dangerous diseases, and they prevent loss of life.

Vaccines are a very large controversy in the United States today. From California requiring all children to be vaccinated before entering schools and the Disneyland Measles outbreak, to the claim that vaccines may cause autism, there is huge talk throughout families and the media today about vaccinations. There are many people with differing opinions about vaccines. Whether it is about what the vaccine consists of, whether it is a right that we, as American’s, are allowed to make regarding our freedoms, or the risks when children are vaccinated or the risks when they are not vaccinated, there is a very large variety of thoughts that are involved in this topic.

This article addresses various popular concerns about vaccines that parents often wonder about for their child. It addresses major reasons why parents’ refuses or hesitant to vaccinate them. Vaccine refusal has been associated with numerous outbreaks includes, varicella, measles, Haemophilus influenza type A and B as well as pertussis, causing unnecessary suffering of young children and also a waste of limited public health resources. This source is acceptable and reliable as information found in this article has been replicated in other sources and studies. This article has also been published within the last year and therefore, this source is current. In addition to, source had a good reputation for publications of quality articles which

Medical professionals argue vaccines are beneficial to society because they are 99% safe and effective, and they save over two million lives per year. However, despite the fact that vaccines promote a healthier community by preventing fatal diseases, there is still an increasing opposition to them, do to a distrust in science and medicine. Yet, if science proves vaccines are more beneficial than not, why do so many people have a distrust in vaccination? In this essay I will discuss the vaccine debate and explain how it reflects a bad relationship between science and society.

I do not believe that the writers of the article against vaccines had a motive to eliminate vaccines from standard health care practice, but I believe that it appealed to parents because of the nature of Autism. There is no one cause of the disease, and because it is often not detected until the child is two or older, many parents become confused and angry. Being able to point a finger at something that made this change in their baby, and no longer having to wonder if it was something that they did, parents buy into this fallicy.

The international crisis behind the questioning of vaccines began when Lancet came out with an article in 1988 by Andrew Wakefield, MD. Within this publication, Dr. Wakefield scared the public when he suggested that there is a link between vaccinations and autism in children (Dyer, 2015). After this article was released, the population showed an increasing distrust in the healthcare system. However, since this time, many other medical doctors have come out and reported that Dr. Wakefield’s allegations are false, considering he did not provide evidence behind his statements. Still, in todays’ era, the world continues to see an increasing suspicion of the vaccine engineers and the idea that vaccines are beneficial- this

However, they are not the only group involved in sharing this knowledge, as the ‘Media’ as a contending group of knowers who concern themselves with collating and sharing knowledge, have caused a widespread distrust and fear of vaccines, due to claims of toxic components within vaccines and suggested correlation to rising autism diagnosis. Celebrities, naturopaths and sites hiding behind pseudoscientific ‘evidence’ have come forward over the years in pro-tests of vaccines,

Companies and people are withholding information about vaccines that parents don’t know about. Many lies have been written about the actual rates of deaths or side effects. According to Evidence does not show that benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks, “Vaccine manufacturers, health officials, medical doctors, lead authors of important studies, editors of major medical journals, hospital personnel, and even coroners, cooperate to minimize vaccine failings, exaggerate benefits, and avert any negative publicity that might frighten concerned parents, threaten the vaccine program and lower vaccination rates.” If people that are trusted have to exaggerate the benefits or avert negativity than vaccines shouldn’t be given to all children because people don’t believe that they are safe. Also, most articles on vaccine don’t state the things that are in vaccines, because if people read articles about them, they would no longer want their child to have that vaccine. Here are some ingredients that are in the oral polio vaccines, “In addition, oral polio vaccines are incubated in monkey kidneys, the chickenpox vaccine is brewed in "human embryonic lung cell cultures," and the new HPV vaccine includes particles of sexually transmitted viruses which are now being injected into an entire generation of chaste, young girls.”, this was in the Evidence does not show that benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks article. Vaccines are man made and any scientist could put a chemical in the vaccine and it could change the future generations of

If populations were to adopt a high enough vaccination rate, they would create a herd immunity. Herd immunity, or community immunity is the concept that describes how a population can be protected against diseases even if everyone does not receive the vaccine. As explained by the U.S. Department of Health and Human services in their article titled “Vaccines Protect Your Community”, when a population experiences an outbreak of a fast spreading disease, it is important to have an immunity established so that germs do not easily spread from person to person; however, this can only be accomplished through a herd immunity (1). This is important because communities will be less likely to get sick and it protects those who are not physically able