Vagueness, Ambiguity In Critical Thinking

Critical thinking occurs when a person thinks about a subject or problem to where the development of the quality of ones very own psychological process of actively and skillfully applying, analyzing, and gauging information to come up with an answer or decision. A few important skills that is learned through critical thinking is learning how to discipline oneself in thinking, understanding the world as well as learning themselves. While using Critical thinking in your academic career path while other benefiting from your answer or idea.

Critical thinking is the general cognitive skill of determining the best answer when there is not one correct answer. Critical thinking is a trainable skill that can create innovative

According to Brown and Keeley ambiguity refers to the existence of multiple possible meaning for a word or phrase (Browne & Keeley, 2011, p.53). In the memo Ms. Castle mentioned some resources that justified her claim but also left a lot of ambiguity. Ms. Castle relied on the current success

Critical thinking is the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief and action. In its exemplary form, it is based on universal intellectual values that transcend subject matter divisions: clarity, accuracy, precision, consistency, relevance, sound evidence, good reasons, depth, breadth, and fairness. (Critical thinking community, n.d.)

Vagueness is the rule that a criminal law may be unconstitutional if it does not clearly say what is required or prohibited, what punishment may be imposed, or what persons may be affected. (Hall, 2016.)

Vague laws are considered violations of due process because they do not define a crime and its punishment clearly enough. As determined in Lanzetta v. New Jersey, the fair notice requirement necessitates the objective test of whether or not a reasonable person would acknowledge the act as criminal. However, the void for vagueness doctrine also includes the presumption of constitutionality; if there is doubt whether or not a statute is vague, it is assumed that it is not. This requires the criminal defendant to prove that the law’s

Being vague has always been one of my pet peeves. Not things that are purposely vague, but things that are thoughtlessly vague. Thoughtlessly vague statements are statement that are vague, but not for the purpose of being vague. These statement could and should be tightened, yet they are left with gaping

Critical thinking was defined as a reasonable reflective thinking focused on deciding what actions to make by Ruth R. Robert. Evaluation standards to determine the true worth or value of a statement is very important in critical thinking. If a statement is not valued, it can easily be

What did you already know about Critical Thinking: Making Inferences and Analyzing the Author’s Message? Respond to each concept. What did you already know about making inferences? What did you already know about analyzing the author’s message?

Chapter one is based on critical thinking when it comes to learning psychology. Critical thinking is the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons. It is the ability to look for flaws in arguments and resist claims that have no supporting evidence. First this is asking questions because if their is something that u dont understand its always good to ask quetions so you wont be left puzzled. Defining the problem , examine the evidence ask yourself what evidence supports you argments. Accuracy is unquestionably essential to critical thinking. Relevance means that the information and ideas discussed must be logically relevant to the issue being discussed. Consistency is a key

I think critical thinking is important because it means reasoning, evaluating, analyzing, decision-making, and problem-solving. We need critical thinking in our everyday life, for us to make any little decision we need to think about it wisely, and how it will affect us. Someone with critical thinking skills can understand the logical links between ideas. For example, during my night shift at the ER, we use triage, which is to decide who is the most urgently in need, and whose injuries are less severe and can

Critical thinking is imperative for the benefit of our current and future generations. We have to think through problems with a critical thinking lens to move past them with well through out, constructive solutions. Over the last few weeks moving through this course while reviewing the required text we have discovered new ways to think critically. There are a few lessons that I have taken away from this experience about how I can improve my critical thinking skills.

Critical thinking is the questioning of ideas. It is the process in which you take an argument and analyze it in order to conclude whether that argument is valid. Thinking critically is a good skill that can help others make intelligent decisions and helps them understand what to believe or not believe. Critical thinking is involved in our daily life. For example, every day we make decisions and before every decision we think critically if that is the right decision. We take into consideration the possible consequences of such decision and from that we reach a conclusion. Critical thinking involves disciplined thinking and it teaches you to think for yourself. It is personal growth and confidence that results from learning to exercise your mind to its fullest potential.

Critical thinking means accurate thinking in the search of appropriate and dependable knowledge about the world. Another way to describe it is sensible, insightful, responsible, and skillful thinking that is focused on deciding what to believe or do. Critical thinking is not being able to process information well enough to know to stop for red lights or whether you established the right change at the supermarket.

Kamp ([qtd. in Sauerland]) argue that it is absurd that p ∧ p has the same truth value as p ∧ ¬p if p is 0.5, and the latter statement cannot have a truth value of 0.5, becauses "how could a logical contradiction be true to any degree?" (qtd. in Sauerland 187). Sauerland ([year]) however thinks that this is not the case: if p contains a vague variable, the statement does not need to be a contradiction to be intuitive, e.g. What I did was smart and not smart, or Bea is both tall and not tall are statements which are contradictions, and they still make sense although they are vague (186). I agree that What I did was smart and not smart makes sense in vagueness and fuzzy logic: this statement might be false, or true,