preview

Valerie Strauss Rhetorical Analysis

Satisfactory Essays

Valerie Strauss appears to her readers as an inductive/deductive personality. Throughout this article, she shows the readers her inductive side because she has logical information that leads up to her conclusion about teachers being underpaid. Valerie thinks her information that she presents is reliable and powerful to support her point. She shows the deductive side because she gives her generalization idea of teachers being underpaid, but then moves forward to the facts and statistics to support her idea. Valerie Strauss thought this would convince her audience, in which it did not. The author started closing her article by talking about benefits, one of the last sections of hers was titled “adding benefits to the picture”. Her closing paragraphs were talking about the difference between nature of wages and benefits. The conclusion may have been her strongest paragraph out of the whole article. The three-sentenced conclusion was the only paragraph without one single fact in it. It was the strongest paragraph because it had more than just the logic appeal. Some readers would argue that Valerie Strauss may have showed pathos appeal in the conclusion. It was what she thought about teacher pay, she wanted the teacher wages raised. Valerie Strauss’s conclusion did not seem to re-state her thesis, which then made this another weak paragraph. …show more content…

Overall, as the reader, I feel she did inform her readers about how underpaid teachers are. The way she informed her readers is what I had a problem with. Valerie Strauss had well thought out research and she had a lot of it. I read this article going in thinking of my career and I came out still having the same thoughts. This did not affect my career path at all. I already knew teachers are underpaid, but as in her title she says “it’s worse than you think”- which I did not think it was any worse than I

Get Access